Hi Lise,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Military aviary2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 12, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-12. howcheng { chat} 22:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Excuse me Durova, but I was looking at the triple crown nominations and the nominees list is close to 20. So, what I'm saying is, are you gonna review them sooner or later? I apologize in advance if you're busy right now. GamerPro64 ( talk) 03:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
(outdent) Here's a FAQ: 1. Do I have to write a featured article?
2. Why do you require 10 inline citations for FA and GA?"
3. Do they have to be 10 different sources?
4. Can I count the same article for different parts of the Triple Crown?"
5. I want one of the multi crowns, and I have too many GAs but not enough DYKs. Can I shuffle the credits?
6. I have one type of triple crown and want to get a higher one. Does the work I've already done count toward the next crown?
Makes sense? Durova 412 05:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Would you please take a look at what is going on here. This is a vicious campaign to try and discredit me. I'd be glad to write you off-wiki about the circumstances. Thanks. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 20:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I assume you have no inside information about this:
You're only 77 words over your limit, but could you please redact them? Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
This request has been closed and the final motion is available at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Durova and Shoemaker's Holiday.
The Arbitration Committee notes and deplores the acrimonious nature of the dispute between Shoemaker's Holiday and Durova, and the way it has been needlessly prolonged and intensified on- and off-wiki by both parties, and resolves that:
a) While noting the provisions in paragraph (b):
b) Both parties may, within reason, comment within the same pages (for example, in the Wikipedia:Featured Pictures topic area and similar) providing their comments do not relate directly or indirectly to the other party. They may also, within reason, revert blatant third-party vandalism to each others' or shared works.
c) Should either Shoemaker's Holiday or Durova violate the letter or spirit of these restrictions, they may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator for short periods of up to one week; after the third such violation, the maximum block length shall be one year. All blocks shall be logged below. Appeals of any blocks may be made to the Arbitration Committee.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Hi Lise,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Military aviary2.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 12, 2010. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2010-03-12. howcheng { chat} 22:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Excuse me Durova, but I was looking at the triple crown nominations and the nominees list is close to 20. So, what I'm saying is, are you gonna review them sooner or later? I apologize in advance if you're busy right now. GamerPro64 ( talk) 03:23, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
(outdent) Here's a FAQ: 1. Do I have to write a featured article?
2. Why do you require 10 inline citations for FA and GA?"
3. Do they have to be 10 different sources?
4. Can I count the same article for different parts of the Triple Crown?"
5. I want one of the multi crowns, and I have too many GAs but not enough DYKs. Can I shuffle the credits?
6. I have one type of triple crown and want to get a higher one. Does the work I've already done count toward the next crown?
Makes sense? Durova 412 05:10, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Would you please take a look at what is going on here. This is a vicious campaign to try and discredit me. I'd be glad to write you off-wiki about the circumstances. Thanks. Wildhartlivie ( talk) 20:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
I assume you have no inside information about this:
You're only 77 words over your limit, but could you please redact them? Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
This request has been closed and the final motion is available at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Durova and Shoemaker's Holiday.
The Arbitration Committee notes and deplores the acrimonious nature of the dispute between Shoemaker's Holiday and Durova, and the way it has been needlessly prolonged and intensified on- and off-wiki by both parties, and resolves that:
a) While noting the provisions in paragraph (b):
b) Both parties may, within reason, comment within the same pages (for example, in the Wikipedia:Featured Pictures topic area and similar) providing their comments do not relate directly or indirectly to the other party. They may also, within reason, revert blatant third-party vandalism to each others' or shared works.
c) Should either Shoemaker's Holiday or Durova violate the letter or spirit of these restrictions, they may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator for short periods of up to one week; after the third such violation, the maximum block length shall be one year. All blocks shall be logged below. Appeals of any blocks may be made to the Arbitration Committee.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, ~ Amory (
u •
t •
c) 04:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)