|
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jeremy Griffith may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- with the Bushman <ref> Van der Post, Laurens (2010) ''Heart of the Hunter''Vintage: p. 157 </ref> ) - being less than a week. What he wrote about the Bushmen was constructed from this brief
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
|
Divinecomedy666, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt... YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! – Paine |
15:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio at Jeremy Griffith
Your addition to
Jeremy Griffith has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
A Train
talk 07:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jeremy Griffith, you may be
blocked from editing. From your edit history it is apparent that you are promoting materials written by Gary Clark. Please refrain from doing so. Wikipedia is not a soapbox.
Mar11 (
talk) 09:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello - I am interested in anthropology and have been posting in regards to certain theories that I have an interest in. I understand that some of my posts may have appeared as soapboxing - that was not my intention. My posts are intended to explain some of the leading research in evolution and psychology - the details of which are not readily available to the general public as the articles are behind paywalls. I intend to add some more additions on this topic. If I cross the line from providing the public with access to emerging research in the field to soap-boxing please let me know. I am an infrequent contributor of Wikipedia not entirely conversant with the appropriate protocols. It is obvious that our posts may often reflect personal interests and proclivities - but which may come across as soap boxing. So I would appreciate critical feedback - but I would also like to assure you that I am acting in good faith and the desire to give the public access to some of the cutting edge theories and debates on the convergence of evolution, anthropology and psychology. Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 14:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Ardipithecus into
Origin of language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This is regarding an edit you did back in March 2017. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 16:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
~Swarm~ {sting} 06:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Jungian neuroscience refs
Hi, please put <ref> </ref> tags around each individual source. I started to do it myself but I can't tell in your formatting where one source ends and another begins. Schazjmd (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok - my thinking was that there are about six or seven different references which are making the point I was making. In academic writing they often put numerous refrences under one footnote or ednnote if they are making similar points. A new footnore is only needed if it is a seperate point being made. Might that be possible here - or does wiki have different protocols? If I put ref tags around each reference then each will have its own number - which with multiple refernecs that may clutter the text? I will be leaving it for tonigth but will do some more editing in the next few days...thanks for yuor help... Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 14:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- ...also each reference ends with ; which is follwed by the next...
Divinecomedy666 (
talk) 14:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to check out
Template:Multiref2 for that purpose. The problem with the approach you took is the listings in the reference section are near unreadable for readers with everything just run together.
Schazjmd
(talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok will do - thanks for your help - that will solve the issue. I intend to add more subheadings to the article over the coming weeks - hopefully after about four I would like to add a contents section and maybe some images as well. If you could suggest resources to help with that, that would be great... Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 15:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to check out
Template:Multiref2 for that purpose. The problem with the approach you took is the listings in the reference section are near unreadable for readers with everything just run together.
Schazjmd
(talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jeremy Griffith may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- with the Bushman <ref> Van der Post, Laurens (2010) ''Heart of the Hunter''Vintage: p. 157 </ref> ) - being less than a week. What he wrote about the Bushmen was constructed from this brief
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 02:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Divinecomedy666, you thanked me for one of my recent edits, so here is a heart-felt... YOU'RE WELCOME! It's a pleasure, and I hope you have a lot of fun while you edit this inspiring encyclopedia phenomenon! – Paine |
15:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyvio at Jeremy Griffith
Your addition to
Jeremy Griffith has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
A Train
talk 07:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Jeremy Griffith, you may be
blocked from editing. From your edit history it is apparent that you are promoting materials written by Gary Clark. Please refrain from doing so. Wikipedia is not a soapbox.
Mar11 (
talk) 09:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello - I am interested in anthropology and have been posting in regards to certain theories that I have an interest in. I understand that some of my posts may have appeared as soapboxing - that was not my intention. My posts are intended to explain some of the leading research in evolution and psychology - the details of which are not readily available to the general public as the articles are behind paywalls. I intend to add some more additions on this topic. If I cross the line from providing the public with access to emerging research in the field to soap-boxing please let me know. I am an infrequent contributor of Wikipedia not entirely conversant with the appropriate protocols. It is obvious that our posts may often reflect personal interests and proclivities - but which may come across as soap boxing. So I would appreciate critical feedback - but I would also like to assure you that I am acting in good faith and the desire to give the public access to some of the cutting edge theories and debates on the convergence of evolution, anthropology and psychology. Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 14:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Ardipithecus into
Origin of language. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This is regarding an edit you did back in March 2017. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk) 16:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
~Swarm~ {sting} 06:24, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Jungian neuroscience refs
Hi, please put <ref> </ref> tags around each individual source. I started to do it myself but I can't tell in your formatting where one source ends and another begins. Schazjmd (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok - my thinking was that there are about six or seven different references which are making the point I was making. In academic writing they often put numerous refrences under one footnote or ednnote if they are making similar points. A new footnore is only needed if it is a seperate point being made. Might that be possible here - or does wiki have different protocols? If I put ref tags around each reference then each will have its own number - which with multiple refernecs that may clutter the text? I will be leaving it for tonigth but will do some more editing in the next few days...thanks for yuor help... Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 14:50, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- ...also each reference ends with ; which is follwed by the next...
Divinecomedy666 (
talk) 14:53, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to check out
Template:Multiref2 for that purpose. The problem with the approach you took is the listings in the reference section are near unreadable for readers with everything just run together.
Schazjmd
(talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ok will do - thanks for your help - that will solve the issue. I intend to add more subheadings to the article over the coming weeks - hopefully after about four I would like to add a contents section and maybe some images as well. If you could suggest resources to help with that, that would be great... Divinecomedy666 ( talk) 15:06, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- You might want to check out
Template:Multiref2 for that purpose. The problem with the approach you took is the listings in the reference section are near unreadable for readers with everything just run together.
Schazjmd
(talk) 15:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)