Hello family!
I am requesting your assistance to make this one of the best pages on wikipedia! Svatantrika-Prasaṅgika distinction
@ Kester ratcliff:@ Javierfv1212:@ Foresterr:Perhaps a review of and final position on the Theravada debate in subsection concerning ignorance
@ Caspian blue: Maybe a section on Madhyamika according to Korean Buddhism?
@ Redplaidbuddhism:Just 'cause you sound awesome.
@ Riwo:A review of my section on emptiness as "not being nothingness" and assistance in finding supporting documentation outside Tsongkhapa. Supporting evidence to the contrary could be placed under "Criticisms" as well.
@ Secretlondon:A subsection on Karma Kagyu and the distinction? Or perhaps just Karma Kagyu and Madhyamika in general.
@ Daphne Lantier:A section on Zen and the distinction? Also, please help me get some other Zen folks to chip in on that section!!!
@ Illusory ego:@ 1337 Tibet:@ Cermus 5:@ Chris Fynn:@ Deeptrivia:@ Dzogchenpa:@ FrederickII:@ KGF0:@ Manthatmandala:@ Merigar:@ Sherab1180:@ Tinylittlewoman: Help reviewing general information, but also finding specifically non-Gelugpa sources of information for additional sections of the discussion. Also, non-Gelugpa sources of confirmation of Tsonkhapa's views in the Tsongkhapa section... and non-Gelugpa (and Gelugpa) contentions for the section on "Criticism."
@ Vajrayosidbhagesuvijahara:@ ZeroEgo:A section on Tantra and the distinction.
@ Wingspeed: We need some pics and pic captions!
Follow the link! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- PS: don't forget to log-in, and sleep tight tonight. I'm off to work in an hour-and-a-half. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Dienekles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- replying to this:
- Dienekles, Its good you have removed copyvio content. Now if the draft clears Wikipedia:Notability and has WP:GNG, it will be published to article by the AfC reviewer. As I am not sure about subject's notability, i am passing it over to next reviewer. --Gpkp u • t • c 07:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello family!
I am requesting your assistance to make this one of the best pages on wikipedia! Svatantrika-Prasaṅgika distinction
@ Kester ratcliff:@ Javierfv1212:@ Foresterr:Perhaps a review of and final position on the Theravada debate in subsection concerning ignorance
@ Caspian blue: Maybe a section on Madhyamika according to Korean Buddhism?
@ Redplaidbuddhism:Just 'cause you sound awesome.
@ Riwo:A review of my section on emptiness as "not being nothingness" and assistance in finding supporting documentation outside Tsongkhapa. Supporting evidence to the contrary could be placed under "Criticisms" as well.
@ Secretlondon:A subsection on Karma Kagyu and the distinction? Or perhaps just Karma Kagyu and Madhyamika in general.
@ Daphne Lantier:A section on Zen and the distinction? Also, please help me get some other Zen folks to chip in on that section!!!
@ Illusory ego:@ 1337 Tibet:@ Cermus 5:@ Chris Fynn:@ Deeptrivia:@ Dzogchenpa:@ FrederickII:@ KGF0:@ Manthatmandala:@ Merigar:@ Sherab1180:@ Tinylittlewoman: Help reviewing general information, but also finding specifically non-Gelugpa sources of information for additional sections of the discussion. Also, non-Gelugpa sources of confirmation of Tsonkhapa's views in the Tsongkhapa section... and non-Gelugpa (and Gelugpa) contentions for the section on "Criticism."
@ Vajrayosidbhagesuvijahara:@ ZeroEgo:A section on Tantra and the distinction.
@ Wingspeed: We need some pics and pic captions!
Follow the link! Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:26, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
- PS: don't forget to log-in, and sleep tight tonight. I'm off to work in an hour-and-a-half. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 04:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Dienekles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
- replying to this:
- Dienekles, Its good you have removed copyvio content. Now if the draft clears Wikipedia:Notability and has WP:GNG, it will be published to article by the AfC reviewer. As I am not sure about subject's notability, i am passing it over to next reviewer. --Gpkp u • t • c 07:47, 22 December 2020 (UTC)