Mystus pelusius, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong ( talk) 07:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Ghatiana aurantica, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren ( talk) 07:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Pangasius larnaudii, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 19:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Gubernatoriana triangulus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 21:56, 30 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Ghatiana pulchra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer ( talk) 11:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Demopan444! Your additions to Draft:Barytelphusa cunicularis have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae  /tlk 12:20, 29 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Demopan444. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ghatiana aurantica, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Demopan444. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ghatiana aurantica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Siler niser has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Possible copyvio https://zse.pensoft.net/article/99285/ Leoneix _{( talk)} 16:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Okay, I will rewrite the page tommorw. Demopan444 ( talk) 16:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

It would be nice if it could be moved to my userpage or userdraft in the meantime Demopan444 ( talk) 16:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Leoneix, the source is CC-licensed, please see the about page of the journal article.

Otherwise, Demopan, thank you for your edits.
You have copied content from a Creative Commons-licensed source into the article, which is allowed.
However, please note that you must always add a relevant notice that the content is copied beyond simply citing it, using a template like {{ cc-notice}}; I have fixed it for you in the meantime.
Please see this page for further information. Thank you! – Isochrone ( talk) 19:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Apologies for the mistake. Leoneix _{( talk)} 00:52, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

no problem =) Demopan444 ( talk) 01:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you have added Creative Commons licensed text to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Minervarya gomantaki. You are welcome to import appropriate Creative Commons licensed content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Compatibly licensed sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any Creative Commons content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Diannaa i will use an attribution tempate, thank you. how do I know what license a research paper is however? Demopan444 ( talk) 12:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Look carefully at the paper and find the license. If you can't find a license or you see a copyright symbol then you have to assume it's copyright. That said, I have now downloaded the paper and I see the message "Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press" so it looks like I made a mistake; we can't copy from that paper. — Diannaa ( talk) 12:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

So i would have to rewrite everything in my words? Demopan444 ( talk) 14:14, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes. — Diannaa ( talk) 14:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Craspedocephalus peltopelor has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Fine, I will rewrite them all without any problem. I wanted to rework that page anyway. In the meanwhile you can see my sandbox here:

/info/en/?search=User:Demopan444/sandbox

I use this to freely make pages before putting them into mainspace wikipedia, you will see no copyrighted material. Demopan444 ( talk) 14:11, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Copyright content is not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia, not even in sandboxes or drafts. Don't add copyright material anywhere on this website, not even temporarily for editing. Thanks — Diannaa ( talk) 22:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Diannaa I did not. i litteraly told that I didn't add copyrighted material to that page as a showcase Demopan444 ( talk) 00:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I just wanted to make sure you were clear on the rules. A lot of people don't know — Diannaa ( talk) 01:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Diannaa alright no problem buddy. I'll try not to do this. I'll write everything in my own words Demopan444 ( talk) 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Look at this new page of mine /info/en/?search=Flueggea_leucopyrus

This time it dosent have any copyright violations :) I promise not to do this again! Thank you. Demopan444 ( talk) 06:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oligodon tillacki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gujrat. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karnataka Milk Federation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hassan.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 18:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC) reply