This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

There has been alot of recent vandilsm to your user page, I would suggest, if you could, lock it to IP's. All of the vandlism has been reverted out, no worrys but I just do not want anymore on your user page.

Cheers, -- Drestros power 18:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)Drestros power

you think I vandalized your user page. let me tell you some thing I do wikipedia from school so if you think its me I don't give a shit, because its not.I did tell some friends what happend, but I didn't tell them to do it. So You Have a lovely day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DenDeZ ( talk • contribs) 12:31 14 May 2007

Thanks for uploading Image:040906-vindicator.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Betacommand ( talk • contribs) 02:02, 16 May 2007

Hey... saw that you are posting a lot on fire service related articles. I am starting a wiki that is solely based on the fire service. Thought you might be interested. Take a look and let me know....-- Mfinney 00:09, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey I was wondering if you'd consider starting a Hazardous Materials response related topic in the Fire Service project? Jrfireboy2 03:13, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo EastwoodMall.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:20, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello, I'm currently working on an article involving the Houston Fire Department's history, which can be viewed at here and need additional eyes before I start posting it, but I'm also interested in perhaps of starting/contributing to an article dealing with the history of firefighting in America. I would also like to know if there are current plans, or the potential for a list of firefighters that died on duty and their circumstances.-- Hourick 12:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Autoblock lifted, you should be good to go. Sorry for the trouble! – Luna Santin ( talk) 21:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

You are probably unaware but there is no point whatsoever in removing a redirect (as you did in Spafford Farm massacre), I believe you will find it somewhere within the MOS, if you want I will hunt down the link. IvoShandor 21:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Daysleeper47,

Thank you for the comments. As you can see I'm very new to Wiki and have alot to learn. It took me 15 minutes just to find out how to get this message to you! :) As you can see from my website [www.bosamar.com] I have been working on the 6 Escort Carrier admiral biographies (Tommy Sprague, Henderson, Stump, Sample, Clifton Sprague, and Osftie). In addition, I have a few biographies of famous submarine officers which I am working on (Fluckey, Cromwell, Morton, and Cutter). I plan to post/update all these on Wiki.

I reviewed the article grading criteria on your advice. I'll work on the Stump article references.

Once again, I have much to learn on "how-to" do things on Wiki. I appreciate your assistance and enjoy corresponding with you.

I have left some (hopefully useful!) comments at the peer review for Youngstown, Ohio. If you find them helpful, why not show your everlasting gratitude by commenting on Brabham BT19. If you found them offensive and off the point, why not get revenge by commenting on Brabham BT19. :) Seriously, if you have the time, it's always useful to have another set of eyes look over an article, but if you are up to your ears in other things, or just find the topic unutterably boring, I shan't be offended. Cheers. 4u1e 12:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm a current student- as of next Tuesday anyway- Moving on campus as a Freshman. How about you? Creamypeanutbutter 08:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm rooming in Murphy (yep, still co-ed) and starting this year, Pacelli is an all-female freshman, while Sutowski is all male. These were switched due to a handicap necessity for a freshman guy, as well as the large female:male ratio of the freshman class (So I've been told)

Thanks for forwarding the peer review comments! Most of the comments were extremely specific, which seemed like a good sign. (If the article had serious problems, a reviewer might stick to general comments.) I'll look over the article tomorrow.- haeksang 06:41, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

People have noted that this has grown to a pretty impressive article, and you noted that it would need more citations to be an A-class, which it has plenty now. What do you think? -- Usertaffy3 15:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps it's time for de-motion? [1] Regards Escaper27 14:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Formerly Escaper 2007 and Escaper 7

No problem - I always had my suspicions. If you've got a spare 15 mins, read the debate for blocking on the above link, it makes interesting reading. Escaper27 16:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

On A&M Corps of Cadets talk page. — BQZip01 —  ^talk 13:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to assess this article. I noticed, though, that you didn't leave any comments relating to that assessment. It is my intention to eventually work that article up to GA status, so any feedback or input that you might have as a result of your recent assessment would be most helpful. Thanks! AKRadecki ^Speaketh 16:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

This is just a heads-up. I noticed a problem in the Demographics section. The two Web citations on the chart are not showing up properly in the References section. (The references in question, I think, are #24 and #25.) Unfortunately, I wasn't able to resolve the problem, and I didn't want to risk damaging the chart. - twelsht 18:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)