This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, my GAN for Junya Nakano failed today partly due to lack of images. I was wondering if it would be okay to upload a fair use image of this person as I haven't found a free use version yet. I was also considering using this image since it shows him and the other two composers of Final Fantasy X, which is discussed in the article and is his most famous work. What do you think? The Prince ( talk) 21:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.
There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.
-- User:Nbahn 04:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
A Counter-proposal (
September 26) is being discussed at
DC 8 (talk).
--NBahn (
talk) 04:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, about 10 months ago you sent me a message regarding sources you found on the " House's Head" article, I believe I replied but never received them. It didn't really bother me that much since I was moving on to edit other articles, but now I would like to try for FAc again soon and wondered if you could still send them to me. Also, at a current FLC for Seinfeld (season 2) I was asked to add reviews, I couldn't find much, but Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) told me you had access to LexisNexis (then I remembered the whole "House's Head" thing), so there you have the reason I wrote you this message. Anyways, I hope I'm not bothering you, if you think it's to much work don't bother, if not my e-mail adress is pietjepuk93@live.nl. Thanks.-- Music 26/ 11 16:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi David. You opposed my RfA back in June because of concerns about my AfD participation and my comments during the DougsTech debates. I'm trying to get as much input as possible to determine how I've been doing since my RfA and if I'll be ready for another one in a few months. If you had the time, I was wondering if you'd mind giving me an editor review, focusing most heavily on how (and if) I've improved in the areas you were most concerned about during my RfA. Thanks. Tim meh ( review me) 00:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I just realized, I've fixed all the issues you brought up on Lego Star Wars II's peer review. If I nominated it at FAC, would you support it? Tezkag72 ( talk) 17:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to bug ya, but I'm putting MissingNo. through a Peer Review at the moment and working to try and bring it before FAC, but something bugs me: the size. It's not that the article's short on information as it's stripmined all available info in reliable sources, but I'm worried a reviewer might shoot it down based solely on article size (despite there being nothing else to say). What do you think?
Also while I'm here I changed the image in Rufus (Street Fighter) to artwork of his initial design. Does it fit fair-use standards better now?-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 01:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, David, can you please confirm that the OTRS permission for this article is valid. It appears the author has added the tag to the talk page without following the correct process. Thank you and my best to you... ttonyb1 ( talk) 04:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Can you please check the talk section of Halo: Reach? I'm confused about the fifth or sixth thing, because I didn't get a clear answer from your debate.
Thanks, Spartan S58 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC).
I'll look it over tonight and hopefully tomorrow. Thanks for letting me know. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 23:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Starcraft free.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Starcraft free.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Starcraft free.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 06:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey David:
These changes were made recently to this biography which seem unwarranted given that they are mostly from another article more relevant to the topic. Also, there are several Cite Errors on this. Any chance you could have a look?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Ledonne —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zephjclark ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
No, they are not against policies. If they were, they would be not allowed on Wikipedia, and other companies would not have them in their articles. Connormah ( talk) 14:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there some discussion where people came to a consensus that SVG images were barred by the NFCC. I can see the arguments that david is making but I could also see SVG as 'resolution free' with respect to our guidelines. SVGs are very literally a set of instructions for a render engine. They may output something of a high resolution (or fidelity, whatever our concern is) but they aren't exactly 'high resolution'. And I'm not sure generally that the 'competing interest' portion of our policy demands the same actions for logos as they do photographs (where the display of the photo itself is possibly in competition with the rights holder). Can someone send me a pointer to a past discussion? Protonk ( talk) 22:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I understand that you, David are sour over this matter, but I dislike the way you are puppy-guarding the article. As I have stated previously, I am trying to help out, and improve the article by adding a vector image. I find it totally unneccessary for you to make comments such as 'either way, you are not a significant contributor to this article. please go away and plaster your SVGs elsewhere' and ' I don't appreciate people who don't do jack to actually develop articles, especially coming from an administrator. -- Connormah ( talk) 22:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
me and connor discussed this and decided on PNG, so. please. stop. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) [ Bungie edit summary
Thanks for uploading File:Bungie.net-heatmaps.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 19:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:S08-first contact borg queen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello there! Thanks for agreeing to participate in Wikivoices' FAC review episode. This is just a reminder to let you know that the episode starts in about twenty minutes. I am going to be hosting the call, so could you please add 'NuclearWarfare' to your contact list so that I can add you to the discussion? Thanks. I hope to hear you soon. NW ( Talk) 18:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Desperate Housewives (season 1)/archive1; the article has two fair-use images. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi David. I've removed the coin pic from the Quiriguá article and I would appreciate it if you could return to the FA nom and respond to my reply. Many thanks, Simon Burchell ( talk) 10:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
There is a thread on the talk page of the above named article regarding whether that council is still active at Wikipedia talk:Advisory Council on Project Development#Still viable?. As one of the listed members, your input would very likely be useful. Thank you. John Carter ( talk) 16:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi I replied to your post here. Check it out. (SUDUSER) 85 17:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is true. It was in a video, showing a French man (guessing by language and accent) opening a box containing Halo 3: ODST. There are now multiple videos, the same one it seems. here is one. Several forum sites (Google testing with "halo 3 odst leak french") mention Microsoft preparing to ban anyone who gets ODST, and then attempts to use LIVE (probably in order to stop them from playing online Firefight). —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsirisV ( talk • contribs)
I didn't get that :/ Perhaps explain? Best wishes Hekerui ( talk) 01:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Heh. I was just about to go put in a request for protection on that article, too. :D Peptuck ( talk) 20:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
As you are one of the most prolific editors here on Wikipedia, I believe it's about time you receive a barnstar from me. I am impressed at how many articles you have managed to get to FA status, and how you're able to work in such an efficient manner. You are truly an inspiration to me and many others in terms of writing high quality articles and how to follow Wikipedia's strict image policy. I can't help but to check out your contributions from time to time; I'm amazed at your recent work on Star Trek films to say the least. Keep up the good work and continue doing what you do best! The Prince ( talk) 23:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I wanted to know if you could help with a copyedit on the lead section for The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie as well as the "Releases and debuts" section and anywhere else you detect. Thanx! ATC . Talk 02:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanx for all of your edits so far. ATC . Talk 18:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 16:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey oh, David. I am placing Freelancer up for GAR. The reason why I'm telling you this is because you reviewed and passed it as its current status. I wanna know 1), who's was the nominator, and B), if you can comment
here.
GamerPro64 (
talk) 04:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
What regards to the Star Trek: First Contact article, was it principally your determination as to which non-free content was to be used therein and how? — pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh, please don't think I'm taking you to task for the NFC currently in the article, I just wanted to know if it had been your discretion to use what is currently being used. That being the case, I wanted to give you something.
The Original Barnstar | ||
For you excellent discretion in application of non-free content to the article Star Trek: First Contact. They excellently illustrate points made and discussion of pre-existing, reliably sourced critical commentary. Furthermore, it is an apt exemplar for other editors to see what constitutes appropriate use of NFC, and not just applying them for "decoration" or "illustration of plot/subject". Cheers! — pd_THOR | =/\= | 21:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hijacking this thread to ask you a quick one, if you have time. Would I be right in thinking that this image will enter the public domain in the US on September 9 of this year? The film that it's from was released September 9, 1914 and I seem to recall that for works published before 1978 we have to wait 95 years? Many thanks, Steve T • C 22:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.
Sorry to burst your bubble (for making a clean "Enterprise"), but no derivative work can be done on the copyrighted object in photos taken under freedom of panorama. Basically one has to use the object in those photos as is (cropping and adding borders can be done, but cutting it out or modifying some aspects of Enterprise in this case is not allowed). See commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#The right to modify and [[ commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Further derivative works. Jappalang ( talk) 03:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Tokyo Mew Mew episodes/archive1 and comment on the fair-use rationale? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
sorry about that, i forgot to log out and my cousin got ahold of it. im very sorry
sorry about that, i forgot to log out and my cousin got ahold of it. im very sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Q-tip17 ( talk • contribs) 03:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, my GAN for Junya Nakano failed today partly due to lack of images. I was wondering if it would be okay to upload a fair use image of this person as I haven't found a free use version yet. I was also considering using this image since it shows him and the other two composers of Final Fantasy X, which is discussed in the article and is his most famous work. What do you think? The Prince ( talk) 21:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.
There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #8. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know.
-- User:Nbahn 04:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
A Counter-proposal (
September 26) is being discussed at
DC 8 (talk).
--NBahn (
talk) 04:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, about 10 months ago you sent me a message regarding sources you found on the " House's Head" article, I believe I replied but never received them. It didn't really bother me that much since I was moving on to edit other articles, but now I would like to try for FAc again soon and wondered if you could still send them to me. Also, at a current FLC for Seinfeld (season 2) I was asked to add reviews, I couldn't find much, but Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs) told me you had access to LexisNexis (then I remembered the whole "House's Head" thing), so there you have the reason I wrote you this message. Anyways, I hope I'm not bothering you, if you think it's to much work don't bother, if not my e-mail adress is pietjepuk93@live.nl. Thanks.-- Music 26/ 11 16:12, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi David. You opposed my RfA back in June because of concerns about my AfD participation and my comments during the DougsTech debates. I'm trying to get as much input as possible to determine how I've been doing since my RfA and if I'll be ready for another one in a few months. If you had the time, I was wondering if you'd mind giving me an editor review, focusing most heavily on how (and if) I've improved in the areas you were most concerned about during my RfA. Thanks. Tim meh ( review me) 00:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
I just realized, I've fixed all the issues you brought up on Lego Star Wars II's peer review. If I nominated it at FAC, would you support it? Tezkag72 ( talk) 17:23, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Sorry to bug ya, but I'm putting MissingNo. through a Peer Review at the moment and working to try and bring it before FAC, but something bugs me: the size. It's not that the article's short on information as it's stripmined all available info in reliable sources, but I'm worried a reviewer might shoot it down based solely on article size (despite there being nothing else to say). What do you think?
Also while I'm here I changed the image in Rufus (Street Fighter) to artwork of his initial design. Does it fit fair-use standards better now?-- Kung Fu Man ( talk) 01:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, David, can you please confirm that the OTRS permission for this article is valid. It appears the author has added the tag to the talk page without following the correct process. Thank you and my best to you... ttonyb1 ( talk) 04:55, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Can you please check the talk section of Halo: Reach? I'm confused about the fifth or sixth thing, because I didn't get a clear answer from your debate.
Thanks, Spartan S58 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC).
I'll look it over tonight and hopefully tomorrow. Thanks for letting me know. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 23:26, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
File:Starcraft free.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Starcraft free.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Starcraft free.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 06:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey David:
These changes were made recently to this biography which seem unwarranted given that they are mostly from another article more relevant to the topic. Also, there are several Cite Errors on this. Any chance you could have a look?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danny_Ledonne —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zephjclark ( talk • contribs) 23:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 01:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
No, they are not against policies. If they were, they would be not allowed on Wikipedia, and other companies would not have them in their articles. Connormah ( talk) 14:26, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there some discussion where people came to a consensus that SVG images were barred by the NFCC. I can see the arguments that david is making but I could also see SVG as 'resolution free' with respect to our guidelines. SVGs are very literally a set of instructions for a render engine. They may output something of a high resolution (or fidelity, whatever our concern is) but they aren't exactly 'high resolution'. And I'm not sure generally that the 'competing interest' portion of our policy demands the same actions for logos as they do photographs (where the display of the photo itself is possibly in competition with the rights holder). Can someone send me a pointer to a past discussion? Protonk ( talk) 22:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
I understand that you, David are sour over this matter, but I dislike the way you are puppy-guarding the article. As I have stated previously, I am trying to help out, and improve the article by adding a vector image. I find it totally unneccessary for you to make comments such as 'either way, you are not a significant contributor to this article. please go away and plaster your SVGs elsewhere' and ' I don't appreciate people who don't do jack to actually develop articles, especially coming from an administrator. -- Connormah ( talk) 22:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
me and connor discussed this and decided on PNG, so. please. stop. -- Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk) 00:17, 3 September 2009 (UTC) [ Bungie edit summary
Thanks for uploading File:Bungie.net-heatmaps.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 19:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:S08-first contact borg queen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot ( talk) 21:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello there! Thanks for agreeing to participate in Wikivoices' FAC review episode. This is just a reminder to let you know that the episode starts in about twenty minutes. I am going to be hosting the call, so could you please add 'NuclearWarfare' to your contact list so that I can add you to the discussion? Thanks. I hope to hear you soon. NW ( Talk) 18:40, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Desperate Housewives (season 1)/archive1; the article has two fair-use images. Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:31, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 03:45, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi David. I've removed the coin pic from the Quiriguá article and I would appreciate it if you could return to the FA nom and respond to my reply. Many thanks, Simon Burchell ( talk) 10:16, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
There is a thread on the talk page of the above named article regarding whether that council is still active at Wikipedia talk:Advisory Council on Project Development#Still viable?. As one of the listed members, your input would very likely be useful. Thank you. John Carter ( talk) 16:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi I replied to your post here. Check it out. (SUDUSER) 85 17:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it is true. It was in a video, showing a French man (guessing by language and accent) opening a box containing Halo 3: ODST. There are now multiple videos, the same one it seems. here is one. Several forum sites (Google testing with "halo 3 odst leak french") mention Microsoft preparing to ban anyone who gets ODST, and then attempts to use LIVE (probably in order to stop them from playing online Firefight). —Preceding unsigned comment added by OsirisV ( talk • contribs)
I didn't get that :/ Perhaps explain? Best wishes Hekerui ( talk) 01:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Heh. I was just about to go put in a request for protection on that article, too. :D Peptuck ( talk) 20:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
As you are one of the most prolific editors here on Wikipedia, I believe it's about time you receive a barnstar from me. I am impressed at how many articles you have managed to get to FA status, and how you're able to work in such an efficient manner. You are truly an inspiration to me and many others in terms of writing high quality articles and how to follow Wikipedia's strict image policy. I can't help but to check out your contributions from time to time; I'm amazed at your recent work on Star Trek films to say the least. Keep up the good work and continue doing what you do best! The Prince ( talk) 23:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hi, I wanted to know if you could help with a copyedit on the lead section for The Naked Brothers Band: The Movie as well as the "Releases and debuts" section and anywhere else you detect. Thanx! ATC . Talk 02:41, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanx for all of your edits so far. ATC . Talk 18:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by SoxBot ( talk) at 16:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey oh, David. I am placing Freelancer up for GAR. The reason why I'm telling you this is because you reviewed and passed it as its current status. I wanna know 1), who's was the nominator, and B), if you can comment
here.
GamerPro64 (
talk) 04:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
What regards to the Star Trek: First Contact article, was it principally your determination as to which non-free content was to be used therein and how? — pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Oh, please don't think I'm taking you to task for the NFC currently in the article, I just wanted to know if it had been your discretion to use what is currently being used. That being the case, I wanted to give you something.
The Original Barnstar | ||
For you excellent discretion in application of non-free content to the article Star Trek: First Contact. They excellently illustrate points made and discussion of pre-existing, reliably sourced critical commentary. Furthermore, it is an apt exemplar for other editors to see what constitutes appropriate use of NFC, and not just applying them for "decoration" or "illustration of plot/subject". Cheers! — pd_THOR | =/\= | 21:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC) |
Hijacking this thread to ask you a quick one, if you have time. Would I be right in thinking that this image will enter the public domain in the US on September 9 of this year? The film that it's from was released September 9, 1914 and I seem to recall that for works published before 1978 we have to wait 95 years? Many thanks, Steve T • C 22:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Enterprise-model-shopped.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.
Sorry to burst your bubble (for making a clean "Enterprise"), but no derivative work can be done on the copyrighted object in photos taken under freedom of panorama. Basically one has to use the object in those photos as is (cropping and adding borders can be done, but cutting it out or modifying some aspects of Enterprise in this case is not allowed). See commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#The right to modify and [[ commons:Commons:Freedom of panorama#Further derivative works. Jappalang ( talk) 03:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Tokyo Mew Mew episodes/archive1 and comment on the fair-use rationale? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 22:22, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
sorry about that, i forgot to log out and my cousin got ahold of it. im very sorry
sorry about that, i forgot to log out and my cousin got ahold of it. im very sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Q-tip17 ( talk • contribs) 03:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)