This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Coat of arms of Lithuania with which you are related due to participation in the RFC. Leave your statement in a dedicated section for you "Summary of dispute by Cukrakalnis" and the procedure will move forward. -- Pofka ( talk) 20:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marcelus -- Marcelus ( talk) 23:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
It's not GA quality right nowbut didn't give any reasons why. I thought I had addressed all of your points & suggestions. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 13:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Discuss on talk page your distruptive changes, I will revert them now Marcelus ( talk) 20:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a shameful attempt at watering down criticims of ZZ nationalist writings.You literally accused me of manipulation when I used the same source as you for what I was writing (and even provided direct quotes). You, as a person who dehumanized Zigmas Zinkevičius a chauvinist pig three times, should be the one ashamed of lacking basic human decency.
I will revert any change that will touch this topic.It's obvious by now that you are WP:NOTHERE.
If you want to change it, start discussion on a talk pageTo discuss what? You yourself stated that you will revert any change that will touch this topic. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 21:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 22:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Hello, Cukrakalnis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Magnate states".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, why did you reverted my changes on Catholic Church in Lithuania? I adjusted names to their articles. Marcelus ( talk) 20:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).Cukrakalnis ( talk) 21:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).Ergo, Lithuanian names for Lithuanians in an article about Lithuania. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 22:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...I will assume that you are simply acting in bad faithRead WP:GF. What's the use of that sentence? I know that you have a WP:GRUDGE against me as proven by you saying
...I stand by what I said you have deficiencies in the critical apparatus, you are pushing nationalist POV, and I am going through your edits persistently because I don't trust you as an editor.in 16 July 2022. You stalking me is proof that your attitude towards me has not changed much. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Naming within Wikipedia should be consistent.The naming that I use is consistent with the context of the article. Naming within Wikipedia is according to the context - just look at the different use of Gdańsk/ Danzig depending on the period. A vote on this was a notable event that happened in early Wikipedia.
Unless you show to me Jogaila's proof of baptism from 1380s where it is written that he was baptised as Władysław instead of Ladislaus, the Latin version should be kept - Latin was the language of the Roman Catholic Church. You should also note that I wrote in the same article that Vytautas was baptized as 'Wigand' instead of Vygandas, just so we're clear that I am not applying any double standards here.I'm not going to do it, because that would be WP:OR, Jogaila took the name of Władysław, this is what is confirmed by WP:SECONDARY. Besides, you are not consistent, because if you were you would use not Jogaila or Vytautas but Jagalo or Wytowdus/Wytolt, because this is how they are called in texts from that era. It doesn't matter much, I'm simply showing you the nonsense of your argument.
...Jagiello, christened Ladislaus...(p. 60, A Thousand Years of Poland)
After the baptism, when Jagiełło took the name Ladislaus (Władysław), he not only proved to feel at home within the Latin culture of the Polish Kingdom, but also made his mark as a founder of numerous churches and religious houses, was a sophisticated politician and diplomat, and a patron of the University of Cracow which he, along with Queen Hedwig, re-established in 1400.(p.515, Ladislaus II Jagiełło (1386–1434))
I am not aware of a rule that dictates the use of a different city name depending on nationality.You are surprisingly ignorant of Talk:Gdańsk/Vote. Also, the thing is that for lesser-known places like towns and villages, it would be far too disorienting for the average Wikipedia reader to see four or five different names for e.g. Utena depending on who is in control of it. There are already enough people who confuse the Baltics with the Balkans, let alone the countries within it and their capitals. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 10:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Religion in the Lithuanian military has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 ( talk) 18:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Communications units and formations of the Lithuanian Army has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 ( talk) 13:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Coat of arms of Lithuania with which you are related due to participation in the RFC. Leave your statement in a dedicated section for you "Summary of dispute by Cukrakalnis" and the procedure will move forward. -- Pofka ( talk) 20:21, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
The article Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lithuanian Civil War (1697–1702) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marcelus -- Marcelus ( talk) 23:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
It's not GA quality right nowbut didn't give any reasons why. I thought I had addressed all of your points & suggestions. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 13:29, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Discuss on talk page your distruptive changes, I will revert them now Marcelus ( talk) 20:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This is a shameful attempt at watering down criticims of ZZ nationalist writings.You literally accused me of manipulation when I used the same source as you for what I was writing (and even provided direct quotes). You, as a person who dehumanized Zigmas Zinkevičius a chauvinist pig three times, should be the one ashamed of lacking basic human decency.
I will revert any change that will touch this topic.It's obvious by now that you are WP:NOTHERE.
If you want to change it, start discussion on a talk pageTo discuss what? You yourself stated that you will revert any change that will touch this topic. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 21:08, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk) 22:07, 11 February 2023 (UTC)Hello, Cukrakalnis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Magnate states".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi, why did you reverted my changes on Catholic Church in Lithuania? I adjusted names to their articles. Marcelus ( talk) 20:58, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).Cukrakalnis ( talk) 21:51, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...follow the conventions of the language appropriate to the subject (German for German politicians, Portuguese for Brazilian towns, and so on).Ergo, Lithuanian names for Lithuanians in an article about Lithuania. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 22:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
...I will assume that you are simply acting in bad faithRead WP:GF. What's the use of that sentence? I know that you have a WP:GRUDGE against me as proven by you saying
...I stand by what I said you have deficiencies in the critical apparatus, you are pushing nationalist POV, and I am going through your edits persistently because I don't trust you as an editor.in 16 July 2022. You stalking me is proof that your attitude towards me has not changed much. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Naming within Wikipedia should be consistent.The naming that I use is consistent with the context of the article. Naming within Wikipedia is according to the context - just look at the different use of Gdańsk/ Danzig depending on the period. A vote on this was a notable event that happened in early Wikipedia.
Unless you show to me Jogaila's proof of baptism from 1380s where it is written that he was baptised as Władysław instead of Ladislaus, the Latin version should be kept - Latin was the language of the Roman Catholic Church. You should also note that I wrote in the same article that Vytautas was baptized as 'Wigand' instead of Vygandas, just so we're clear that I am not applying any double standards here.I'm not going to do it, because that would be WP:OR, Jogaila took the name of Władysław, this is what is confirmed by WP:SECONDARY. Besides, you are not consistent, because if you were you would use not Jogaila or Vytautas but Jagalo or Wytowdus/Wytolt, because this is how they are called in texts from that era. It doesn't matter much, I'm simply showing you the nonsense of your argument.
...Jagiello, christened Ladislaus...(p. 60, A Thousand Years of Poland)
After the baptism, when Jagiełło took the name Ladislaus (Władysław), he not only proved to feel at home within the Latin culture of the Polish Kingdom, but also made his mark as a founder of numerous churches and religious houses, was a sophisticated politician and diplomat, and a patron of the University of Cracow which he, along with Queen Hedwig, re-established in 1400.(p.515, Ladislaus II Jagiełło (1386–1434))
I am not aware of a rule that dictates the use of a different city name depending on nationality.You are surprisingly ignorant of Talk:Gdańsk/Vote. Also, the thing is that for lesser-known places like towns and villages, it would be far too disorienting for the average Wikipedia reader to see four or five different names for e.g. Utena depending on who is in control of it. There are already enough people who confuse the Baltics with the Balkans, let alone the countries within it and their capitals. Cukrakalnis ( talk) 10:48, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Religion in the Lithuanian military has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 ( talk) 18:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Category:Communications units and formations of the Lithuanian Army has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 ( talk) 13:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)