I just wanted to warn you that the Wikipedia community does not take phrases like "LIBELOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF HER WORK THAT WOULD BE A BASIS FOR A LAWSUIT AGAINST WIKIPEDIA" well. You might want to take a look at our WP:No legal threats policy and consider rephrasing your post. Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
It is a list of victims of censorship, not books worthy of censorship (something the ALA has never supported). Many authors consider appearing on that list a badge of honor; and many parents like myself consider this evidence that the book might be worth buying for our child. -- Orange Mike | Talk 23:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
I just wanted to warn you that the Wikipedia community does not take phrases like "LIBELOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF HER WORK THAT WOULD BE A BASIS FOR A LAWSUIT AGAINST WIKIPEDIA" well. You might want to take a look at our WP:No legal threats policy and consider rephrasing your post. Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
It is a list of victims of censorship, not books worthy of censorship (something the ALA has never supported). Many authors consider appearing on that list a badge of honor; and many parents like myself consider this evidence that the book might be worth buying for our child. -- Orange Mike | Talk 23:48, 5 November 2011 (UTC)