Welcome!
Hello, Clementvidal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please leave a message on my talk page. :) Srose (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
I have restored the content you requested at deletion review. It is at User:Clementvidal/Global brain. Since this content was deleted via the proposed deletion process, you can move it back into mainspace (article space) at any time. Of course, it is always better if you can improve the article, first. Cheers!-- Chaser - T 01:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Once I'll have the new version ready, should I start a brand new page, or should I do something to integrate the history of the old page? Cheers, Clementvidal 16:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nottale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Clement,
A few years ago you asked me a question [ on my talk page]. I think you have addressed the issue by rewriting the article. But there was a copyright problem since regardless of who wrote the article the copyright belongs to Principia Cybernetica and they [ [1]] suggest that their copyright is not freely licensed.
But for the future I think you have done exactly the right thing now: i.e. writing the article in your own words using a variety of sources.
CaptainJ ( t | c | e) 23:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi CaptainJ,
Thanks for your feedback. Best, Clément. -- 134.184.131.126 ( talk) 12:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Peer Review of Flying Spaghetti Monster
I have listed Flying Spaghetti Monster for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 22:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Scale relativity. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr ( talk) 15:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Making bogus or frivolous accusations of wp:vandalism can be seen as a violation of wp:npa. I susgest you think very carefully about over use it. Slatersteven ( talk) 10:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just a routine notice since you've been active within the fringe topic of Scale relativity. – dlthewave ☎ 03:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 | Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Welcome!
Hello, Clementvidal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please leave a message on my talk page. :) Srose (talk) 15:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
I have restored the content you requested at deletion review. It is at User:Clementvidal/Global brain. Since this content was deleted via the proposed deletion process, you can move it back into mainspace (article space) at any time. Of course, it is always better if you can improve the article, first. Cheers!-- Chaser - T 01:04, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot. Once I'll have the new version ready, should I start a brand new page, or should I do something to integrate the history of the old page? Cheers, Clementvidal 16:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Nottale.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 00:11, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Clement,
A few years ago you asked me a question [ on my talk page]. I think you have addressed the issue by rewriting the article. But there was a copyright problem since regardless of who wrote the article the copyright belongs to Principia Cybernetica and they [ [1]] suggest that their copyright is not freely licensed.
But for the future I think you have done exactly the right thing now: i.e. writing the article in your own words using a variety of sources.
CaptainJ ( t | c | e) 23:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi CaptainJ,
Thanks for your feedback. Best, Clément. -- 134.184.131.126 ( talk) 12:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Peer Review of Flying Spaghetti Monster
I have listed Flying Spaghetti Monster for peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 22:18, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Scale relativity. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr ( talk) 15:54, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Making bogus or frivolous accusations of wp:vandalism can be seen as a violation of wp:npa. I susgest you think very carefully about over use it. Slatersteven ( talk) 10:42, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just a routine notice since you've been active within the fringe topic of Scale relativity. – dlthewave ☎ 03:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |