I am currently: Offline (until Feb. 26, 2012)

Archives

/Archive 1 /Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 1 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

This user is taking a wikibreak and would like to say the following things to the follow members To everybody who's trust I had,I am truly sorry. Swarm, I don't care what you think of me now, but you were a great mentor and perhaps maybe even a friend. SudoGhost when you get back, thank you for taking me in when nobody else would. Thank you. Worm you supported my last unblock when nobody else did, on top of that you spent a lot of your time researching a user for me, thank you. To ArcAngel thanks for everything, I hope you make a great admin. To Demiurge thanks for taking my side at ANI. To Gwen Gale, you had every right to block me, please don't think I hate you, I respect you a lot. To Colofac we both had extremely different view points, but you're not blocked indef so good luck on editing. To Floquenbeam you're a nice admin, you didn't block me right away and if I was guilty, I would admit it if I was given the chance that you gave me. To Starship.paint you're a new user with a lot going for you, good luck, To Deely I'm sorry for bringing up your past record to use it against you. Here's the last thing I want to say: I am innocent, I always patrol AIV and always check all the reported user's talk pages. I put "THIS IS A SCHOOL IP" on the top and that's how I knew it was mine. I love you all and I will be back! Thank you everyone! -- Christian and Jericho 09:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Users Addressed above: Swarm Worm SudoGhost ArcAngel Demiurge Colofac Floquenbeam Starship.paint Deely

Hi CandJ. Just a note that WWE Champion redirects to WWE Championship. So, if WWE Championship is already wikilinked in the first half of a sentence, then WWE Champion doesn't need wikilinking in the second half of the sentence. This is because WP:REPEATLINK says that we should, "in general, link only the first occurrence of an item".

This goes for all other situations too. For example, if a wrestler's name is already wikilinked once in an article, we don't need to wikilink it again later in the same article. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 15:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I wouldn't necessarily say for "all other situations", because WP:REPEATLINK gives specific exceptions to that rule. - Bkid ^Talk/ _Contribs 04:56, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Please explain how you were aware so quickly that your school IP had been reported to AIV. This is important; please do not edit anywhere else until you have answered this question. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 02:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I watchlist WP:AIV -- Christian and Jericho 03:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

And you have your school's IP(s) memorized? N^oformation ^Talk 03:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Your school's IP address would not have shown up on your watchlist; it isn't in the edit summary. Would you like to be honest, or would you like me to block you indefinitely? -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 03:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I check AIV every single day I'm serious, check the warnings I have given to random IPS -- Christian and Jericho 03:44, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I don't believe that IP is your school. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:46, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I promise you it is my school, I will log in at home later and edit on this page to show you -- Christian and

Jericho 03:47, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Even if it is your school, you just happened to see your school's IP address at AIV? Which you have memorized? At age 13? Do you really expect us to believe that? Swarm ^{u / t} 03:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Moreover, logging on from another IP "at home" won't prove a thing. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I'll take a picture of the school's computer and the lab and show you? -- Christian and Jericho 03:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Don't. Won't prove that's the IP of your school. Gwen Gale ( talk) 03:53, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

• I find it unlikely that he would have his "school's" current IP address (which evidently changes all the time) memorized. I have a harder time believing that he looked at AIV for no reason (without going there to report anyone) less than 1 minute after his IP was reported, when there is nothing in the edit summary that would have led him to think his IP had just been reported. C&J, last chance to tell the truth. -- Floquenbeam ( talk) 03:54, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Actually, ChristianandJericho, I'm not as nice as Floquenbeam here and I've just blocked you indefinitely. You're obviously not mature enough to edit here without making useless excuses and wasting others' time. I don't think it's fair to treat children any differently than adults on Wikipedia because Wikipedia isn't designed for children—so if you want to edit this site again, it will be a few years in the future. / ƒETCH COMMS / 04:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I support this block. Sorry for wasting people's time on the previous unblock discussion. N^oformation ^Talk 04:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Don't apologize. They were treated perfectly fair to the end, and the unblock was the right thing to do at the time. Swarm ^{u / t} 05:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

For the record, I also fully support the block. Worm^TT · ( talk) 08:25, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Let me ask you something, what if it is true? what if I was patrolling AIV at the time? What advice would you give to me if I am 100% innocent? -- Christian and Jericho 08:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

You have yet to explain how you would know it was your school's IP. Either way, while it is certainly possible that you are innocent here, the evidence is stacked highly against you and you know what they say about ducks N^oformation ^Talk 08:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I knew it was my school's IP because it said THIS IS A SCHOOL IP , which I wrote awhile ago -- Christian and Jericho 09:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

( edit conflict)C&J, when an editor who is on his last chance (ie, you have a history), asks us to believe massive coincidences (you were in exactly the right place, that you looked at a random set of numbers and realised they matched a certain other random set of numbers and then wrote a reply - all in under a minute) - I'd be willing to take the risk that you are innocent. Editing wikipedia is not a right, you'd already had more chances than many think you deserve. Worm^TT · ( talk) 09:06, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

BUT what if it's true? What advice would YOU give to me if i was innocent? What would you tell me to do? -- Christian and Jericho 09:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

All the time, I look at IP addresses' talk page to see if they've been given enough warnings -- Christian and Jericho 09:10, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

If it's true, I expect you're going to have to take your lumps. Leave wikipedia for a few months, don't sock and consider coming back under the WP:STANDARDOFFER. I don't have a better suggestion. Worm^TT · ( talk) 09:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Alright, I'll leave Wikipedia, hopefully somebody will believe me -- Christian and Jericho 09:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I just wanted to say that last year, 2010 I still remembered the IP address I had in 2005 when I was 15 years old and made my first edit on Wikipedia. Admins can check my firsts edits from 2005 and confirm that was my IP. I remembered my school IP back then, and today I know my university IPs, and also I have all the contributions of that IPs in the Google Reader. Kid, I believe you. People like us are very rare-- Neo139 ( talk) 02:46, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Fair comment. But I suggest CandJ not reply to it; this discussion is over. -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 02:50, 24 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Can any user please Archive some comments to my second archive? Thanks -- Christian and Jericho 09:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

I've set it to archive at 1 day... that should remove plenty of things quickly enough. Remember six months only starts once you stop editing, including here. And that includes other accounts, IP addresses, IP addresses that you think no-one will notice, editing by friends on your behalf, editing by unexpected accident... etc ... etc... etc... -- Demiurge1000 ( talk) 09:34, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Okay, let me just make a few more dedications to the top of this page -- Christian and Jericho 09:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

What are your suggestions on what a user should do if they are blocked indef for the same thing as me and the user who was blocked is innocent? -- Christian and Jericho 09:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Stay away from Wikipedia an get over it. Playing the victim makes you look bad. You have a real life, so live it. Wikipedia is rarely healthy for children. / ƒETCH COMMS / 14:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Will check this page everyday and post unblock request in 6 months -- Christian and Jericho 14:36, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Rather than checking the page every day, I suggest you instead tick "E-mail me when my user talk page is changed" under "My Preferences". That way you will still be notified if there's anything happening, but you will not find yourself in perpetual re-living of the same situation. Worm^TT · ( talk) 14:40, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Did that day 1 of my editing -- Christian and Jericho 14:57, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Ok, well it's time for you to actually leave as you have said you intend to do so the clock can start. Replying here isn't helping.--v/r - T P 15:14, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Exactly. Saying that you want to check your talk page every day shows that you have some sort of problematic addiction or connection to Wikipedia and that unblocking you would not really be a good idea. IMO, the best solution is for you to grow older. / ƒETCH COMMS / 15:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

No, it's just my talk page is on my "list of tabs" I open on my homepage. -- Christian and Jericho 15:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC) (LAST COMMENT) reply

I'd suggest removing it or, alternatively, just quit replying.--v/r - T P 16:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

• Given your edits today to User_talk:113.161.74.88, the clock for WP:Standard offer has reset, please don't make any edits on this website until 10 April 2012, at which time you can post an unblock request here. Gwen Gale ( talk) 02:20, 11 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Greetings, based on your recent participation in the article, I'd like to invite you to: Talk:Mukkulathor#Suggest_major_reorganisation_of_the_article. Thanks for your input! MatthewVanitas ( talk) 13:47, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wp ani. Since you had some involvement with the Wp ani redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —  PinkAmpers & ^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 01:47, 11 February 2013 (UTC) reply

The redirect Mark McCool has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26 § Mark McCool until a consensus is reached. Mazewaxie ( talk • contribs) 07:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC) reply