Re: Your edits on Persecution of Muslims
Hello, I have noticed that you have undone two edits by an IP. I notice that this IP was trying to make the tone of the article formal and neutral. I am here to discuss about the article and how we can compromise to make appropriate edits to the article to avoid edit warring. Thanks. Darylgolden( talk) 06:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Darylgolden,I made those changes few hours ago,but i think the editing done earlier was correct.You can't probably tell what the nature of attack was especially if it happened in the 18th century.So i guess i'll have no troubles undoing my own changes.
Chimpu420 (
talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
For this edit, and those that followed. Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
Re: Your edits on Persecution of Muslims
Hello, I have noticed that you have undone two edits by an IP. I notice that this IP was trying to make the tone of the article formal and neutral. I am here to discuss about the article and how we can compromise to make appropriate edits to the article to avoid edit warring. Thanks. Darylgolden( talk) 06:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Darylgolden,I made those changes few hours ago,but i think the editing done earlier was correct.You can't probably tell what the nature of attack was especially if it happened in the 18th century.So i guess i'll have no troubles undoing my own changes.
Chimpu420 (
talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the " Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
For this edit, and those that followed. Darkness Shines ( talk) 10:31, 12 November 2013 (UTC)