And fwiw I'm a she. I'd call that a minor point, but certain man in my life would probably disagree. ;) Durova Charge! 17:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there. I noticed your revert on the blocking policy page, and I think I agree (in that I like the addition, but think it needs wider consensus). I started a section on the talk page in question, and was wondering if you'd like to comment. (Or if you think a RFC should be opened). Cheers, -- Bfigura ( talk) 19:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Your comment at this DRV appears contradictory. You said "Endorse The keep arguments were more in line with policy than the delete arguments. It is not a head count." This would appear to be an "overturn" reasoning, but you may have meant to exchange keep and delete. You might take another look when you're back? Stifle ( talk) 21:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I did. Thanks for fixing it. When posting outside the mainspace, I generally copyedit my comments directly in the edit window, so I sometimes overlook such errors. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 18:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I get frustrated when I try something like that and can't figure out what I am doing wrong. I really appreciate your helping me like that. I consider this kindness important for an editor like me. I've been here for quite awhile but I have problems retaining information, as can been seen at my sandbox with all my reminders. Again, thanks for your help. -- CrohnieGal Talk 20:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there! You had expressed an opinion on this earlier, so I thought I'd notify you that I took these two articles to AfD. See the following discussions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaulim and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uyot. Cheers, Rkitko ( talk) 03:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi Until, I've protected Jeeny's talk page becuase it was getting a little silly but I see you've given him one more chance to discuss things in a calm manner. I still think protection is appropriate at this stage, but feel free to unprotect or revert Jeeny's attack if you feel it's should be removed. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply
You deleted Netvouz while the debate was still on-going. 2 of the 4 sources are not blogs, I had just provided a link establishing the authoritativeness of one of them (Leslie Poston; for the other see here); you didn't give any party an opportunity to comment on this. I don't think this is the way how it should go. I hope this will not bother you too much, and I feel a bit guilty in not helping getting rid of the afd backlog... -- victor falk 22:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I have more to say, but I'd like to hear your opinion on that question before going on.-- victor falk 03:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) replyAre or are not Leslie Poston and the Kochs reliable and verifiable sources when it comes to matters regarding social bookmarking [2]?
You deleted George Cavanaugh based on BLP. I had asked the editor to clarify if the subject was alive, but I don't disagree with your call at all. I'm concerned. however, that the same editor has recently created several articles with similar lack of sourcing on related individuals, some allegedly dead and one allegedly in prison, and has uploaded several photos with US-PD tags. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hdxstunts1 I'm not sure how best to proceed.-- agr ( talk) 16:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I put a note on his talk page.-- agr ( talk) 22:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi, regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Colt (Supernatural), can I ask why you closed as "no consensus" on the strength of two keep votes that didn't address the concerns in the nomination? Thanks, Miremare 23:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm not sure that the strength of the arguments enters into it as there wasn't really an argument on the keep side. Both articles clearly fail WP:NOT, likely unaddressably, a fact that wasn't mentioned by either keeper. In the case of so few !votes, relisting rather than closing would seem to me to have been the best decision. Cheers, Miremare 16:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Would you please, when you get the chance, delete this article that you so correctly closed as delete? :) Thanks so much! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 21:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello, I'm dropping you a note because you are listed on Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin as an admin that is maintaining a personal SALT page. Recent software updates now allow deleted pages to be protected just like other pages. Please consider migrating any pages on your personal list to normal protections, and clearing them off of your list. There still may be situations where a personal list may be the best way to handle a page though. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply
And fwiw I'm a she. I'd call that a minor point, but certain man in my life would probably disagree. ;) Durova Charge! 17:19, 18 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there. I noticed your revert on the blocking policy page, and I think I agree (in that I like the addition, but think it needs wider consensus). I started a section on the talk page in question, and was wondering if you'd like to comment. (Or if you think a RFC should be opened). Cheers, -- Bfigura ( talk) 19:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Your comment at this DRV appears contradictory. You said "Endorse The keep arguments were more in line with policy than the delete arguments. It is not a head count." This would appear to be an "overturn" reasoning, but you may have meant to exchange keep and delete. You might take another look when you're back? Stifle ( talk) 21:31, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I did. Thanks for fixing it. When posting outside the mainspace, I generally copyedit my comments directly in the edit window, so I sometimes overlook such errors. – Black Falcon ( Talk) 18:07, 21 November 2007 (UTC) reply
I get frustrated when I try something like that and can't figure out what I am doing wrong. I really appreciate your helping me like that. I consider this kindness important for an editor like me. I've been here for quite awhile but I have problems retaining information, as can been seen at my sandbox with all my reminders. Again, thanks for your help. -- CrohnieGal Talk 20:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi there! You had expressed an opinion on this earlier, so I thought I'd notify you that I took these two articles to AfD. See the following discussions: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaulim and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uyot. Cheers, Rkitko ( talk) 03:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi Until, I've protected Jeeny's talk page becuase it was getting a little silly but I see you've given him one more chance to discuss things in a calm manner. I still think protection is appropriate at this stage, but feel free to unprotect or revert Jeeny's attack if you feel it's should be removed. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC) reply
You deleted Netvouz while the debate was still on-going. 2 of the 4 sources are not blogs, I had just provided a link establishing the authoritativeness of one of them (Leslie Poston; for the other see here); you didn't give any party an opportunity to comment on this. I don't think this is the way how it should go. I hope this will not bother you too much, and I feel a bit guilty in not helping getting rid of the afd backlog... -- victor falk 22:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I have more to say, but I'd like to hear your opinion on that question before going on.-- victor falk 03:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) replyAre or are not Leslie Poston and the Kochs reliable and verifiable sources when it comes to matters regarding social bookmarking [2]?
You deleted George Cavanaugh based on BLP. I had asked the editor to clarify if the subject was alive, but I don't disagree with your call at all. I'm concerned. however, that the same editor has recently created several articles with similar lack of sourcing on related individuals, some allegedly dead and one allegedly in prison, and has uploaded several photos with US-PD tags. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Hdxstunts1 I'm not sure how best to proceed.-- agr ( talk) 16:56, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I put a note on his talk page.-- agr ( talk) 22:50, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hi, regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Colt (Supernatural), can I ask why you closed as "no consensus" on the strength of two keep votes that didn't address the concerns in the nomination? Thanks, Miremare 23:46, 13 December 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm not sure that the strength of the arguments enters into it as there wasn't really an argument on the keep side. Both articles clearly fail WP:NOT, likely unaddressably, a fact that wasn't mentioned by either keeper. In the case of so few !votes, relisting rather than closing would seem to me to have been the best decision. Cheers, Miremare 16:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Would you please, when you get the chance, delete this article that you so correctly closed as delete? :) Thanks so much! Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 21:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Hello, I'm dropping you a note because you are listed on Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin as an admin that is maintaining a personal SALT page. Recent software updates now allow deleted pages to be protected just like other pages. Please consider migrating any pages on your personal list to normal protections, and clearing them off of your list. There still may be situations where a personal list may be the best way to handle a page though. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 02:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply