HBC NameWatcherBot appears to be operating fine, but signing as an IP. Probably logged out.-- Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 22:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Somebody appears to be deliberately creating numerous accounts with user names with "nipple" in them as some sort of test to see if they will be blocked. There has been some extensive discussion on the subject at ANI recently, and whoever is doing this is likely responding to that. None of these accounts are editing at all. I was wondering if we could get the name watching bot to delay reporting "nipple" user names until they have edited at least once. Thanks Beeblebrox ( talk) 23:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Thank you! Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply
[1] -- Malleus Fatuorum 06:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Strange how some are so upset by the sight of a shaved pubis, but quite relaxed about the public and implicit encouragement of class A drug taking. -- Malleus Fatuorum 15:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
What editing do you do when on drugs? What is the closest proximity of you taking a drug to you making an admin related decision? Do you ever use your secondary account while on drugs? Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is an admittance of taking Class A substances while editing Wikipedia. The above questions are not ridiculous, but your statement is incivil. Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
RxS, this is your warning for disruptive editing. If you want to continue, please be advise that you are walking off a short pier. Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
There have been no accusations about his administrative actions. Only questions. However, it is odd how defensive your post and RxS's posts are. What are you afraid of in his response? Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
RxS, do I have to report you to ANI or will you refrain from making such inappropriate attacks and disruptive posts? Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
If it was a ridiculous question, then you would ignore it. However, your hostile response shows that it is a question that has an answer that you know would damage Chillum and possibly result in his desysopping. As such, your response has done more to harm Chillum than any responses he could make. He could simply have denied any inappropriateness, but you sealed the idea that even his defenders believe he has acted irresponsibly. Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Chillum, saying that I should come here to talk and then accusing me of making a pointless question are contradictory. One or the other. The drugs you do are at issue, because admin are supposed to be objective. I would like to know if you use drugs while making admin actions. A simple yes or no will suffice. Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
If you refuse to admit it, then I guess the only recourse is an RfC on admin use. If we have no ability to know when and how your drug use can affect your judgment as an admin, then you can no longer be trusted to have the ops. Ottava Rima ( talk) 18:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I think Wikipedia would be a much better operation if more of our Admins took recreational drugs. But seriously, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Just wanted you to know that not all of us out here see you being Learied from time to time as an issue of ZOMGWTFONOESTHECHILDRENTHINKOFTHECHILDRENS!!!!!1! proprotions.
Now pass me the bong. ;)
Crafty ( talk) 19:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Aemanops8135 has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Cool dove man. It's wings are like huuuuuuuuuuge. Crafty ( talk) 20:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Perhaps you care to spend some time in your garden while taking a break. If so, I left you some seeds. May your plants thrive. Drmies ( talk) 05:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
That I let you know Ottava's Campaign has moved from Jimmy's page to the glittering halls of the ANI. On the upside it's his conduct that is, once again, under the gaze. Crafty ( talk) 06:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
So, several of the things I jokingly threatened in my first post on this topic [2] have actually come to pass. I find myself unable to decide if that is funny or sad. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Would you like to add this category to your User Page? [[Category:Wikipedians with alternate accounts]] Off2riorob ( talk) 18:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
"Hey dude, wazz up?" (peaked at the ANI thing & had a good chuckle). GoodDay ( talk) 23:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
HBC NameWatcherBot appears to be operating fine, but signing as an IP. Probably logged out.-- Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 22:51, 27 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Somebody appears to be deliberately creating numerous accounts with user names with "nipple" in them as some sort of test to see if they will be blocked. There has been some extensive discussion on the subject at ANI recently, and whoever is doing this is likely responding to that. None of these accounts are editing at all. I was wondering if we could get the name watching bot to delay reporting "nipple" user names until they have edited at least once. Thanks Beeblebrox ( talk) 23:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Thank you! Beeblebrox ( talk) 00:15, 31 October 2009 (UTC) reply
[1] -- Malleus Fatuorum 06:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Strange how some are so upset by the sight of a shaved pubis, but quite relaxed about the public and implicit encouragement of class A drug taking. -- Malleus Fatuorum 15:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
What editing do you do when on drugs? What is the closest proximity of you taking a drug to you making an admin related decision? Do you ever use your secondary account while on drugs? Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This is an admittance of taking Class A substances while editing Wikipedia. The above questions are not ridiculous, but your statement is incivil. Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:36, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
RxS, this is your warning for disruptive editing. If you want to continue, please be advise that you are walking off a short pier. Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:43, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
There have been no accusations about his administrative actions. Only questions. However, it is odd how defensive your post and RxS's posts are. What are you afraid of in his response? Ottava Rima ( talk) 16:57, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
RxS, do I have to report you to ANI or will you refrain from making such inappropriate attacks and disruptive posts? Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
If it was a ridiculous question, then you would ignore it. However, your hostile response shows that it is a question that has an answer that you know would damage Chillum and possibly result in his desysopping. As such, your response has done more to harm Chillum than any responses he could make. He could simply have denied any inappropriateness, but you sealed the idea that even his defenders believe he has acted irresponsibly. Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:21, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Chillum, saying that I should come here to talk and then accusing me of making a pointless question are contradictory. One or the other. The drugs you do are at issue, because admin are supposed to be objective. I would like to know if you use drugs while making admin actions. A simple yes or no will suffice. Ottava Rima ( talk) 17:52, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
If you refuse to admit it, then I guess the only recourse is an RfC on admin use. If we have no ability to know when and how your drug use can affect your judgment as an admin, then you can no longer be trusted to have the ops. Ottava Rima ( talk) 18:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
I think Wikipedia would be a much better operation if more of our Admins took recreational drugs. But seriously, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Just wanted you to know that not all of us out here see you being Learied from time to time as an issue of ZOMGWTFONOESTHECHILDRENTHINKOFTHECHILDRENS!!!!!1! proprotions.
Now pass me the bong. ;)
Crafty ( talk) 19:35, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Aemanops8135 has given you a
dove! Doves promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day happier. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a dove, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past (this fits perfectly) or a good friend. Cheers!
Spread the peace of doves by adding {{ subst:Peace dove}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
Cool dove man. It's wings are like huuuuuuuuuuge. Crafty ( talk) 20:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Perhaps you care to spend some time in your garden while taking a break. If so, I left you some seeds. May your plants thrive. Drmies ( talk) 05:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
That I let you know Ottava's Campaign has moved from Jimmy's page to the glittering halls of the ANI. On the upside it's his conduct that is, once again, under the gaze. Crafty ( talk) 06:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
So, several of the things I jokingly threatened in my first post on this topic [2] have actually come to pass. I find myself unable to decide if that is funny or sad. Beeblebrox ( talk) 18:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
Would you like to add this category to your User Page? [[Category:Wikipedians with alternate accounts]] Off2riorob ( talk) 18:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply
"Hey dude, wazz up?" (peaked at the ANI thing & had a good chuckle). GoodDay ( talk) 23:50, 2 November 2009 (UTC) reply