This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
👋 Hi! Can you please adopt me? You seemed like the best fit on the adoption page for me.
-- Gaurarjun ( talk) 23:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Then could you please put yourself as not available please? Heroe Of Time ( talk) 07:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
hi. i was wondering if it is possible for you to adopt me, under the Wikipedia program to do? I could really use your help and input. I appreciate it. thanks!!! -- Sm8900 ( talk) 14:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Charlesdrakew, I am Dishita Bhowmik. I have been on wikipedia for sometime even though I have been more active recently. Your name was listed as Available adopter. I am not exactly a newbie; I know Wikipedia policies, understand vandalism and sometimes review recent changes to find and warn vandals, have created two mainspace articles and done some other work. But I still think that Adoption would help me a lot. Would you like to adopt me? Yours, DishitaBhowmik 17:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC) To reply please ping because I edit on the web so general mentions don't come up on my notices.
I am coming across articles with Controversy sections separate to the History section. Links not to hand but could add them as I come across them if wanted though I think you will have seen some. I think the 'Controversies' should be integrated into History. Having separate sections seems to dramatise part of history which is just part of the flow of life. Editors with axes to grind may wish to downplay unpleasantness or promote it depending on their PoV by having a separate section. Have you any thoughts with reference to policy or guidelines? Best wishes. SovalValtos ( talk) 18:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I came across this [1] possible source via a news item. I would not like to see it being used on its own without being balanced by other sourced opinions as it seems to push a particular PoV. How about population growth, global warming or nuclear war as being equal or graver tests for the world if not UN? Is there a means of establishing whether a linked source such as this has been used so as to be able to give an alternative? Best wishes. SovalValtos ( talk) 20:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
👋 Hi! Can you please adopt me? You seemed like the best fit on the adoption page for me.
-- Gaurarjun ( talk) 23:49, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Then could you please put yourself as not available please? Heroe Of Time ( talk) 07:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
hi. i was wondering if it is possible for you to adopt me, under the Wikipedia program to do? I could really use your help and input. I appreciate it. thanks!!! -- Sm8900 ( talk) 14:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi Charlesdrakew, I am Dishita Bhowmik. I have been on wikipedia for sometime even though I have been more active recently. Your name was listed as Available adopter. I am not exactly a newbie; I know Wikipedia policies, understand vandalism and sometimes review recent changes to find and warn vandals, have created two mainspace articles and done some other work. But I still think that Adoption would help me a lot. Would you like to adopt me? Yours, DishitaBhowmik 17:34, 25 February 2020 (UTC) To reply please ping because I edit on the web so general mentions don't come up on my notices.
I am coming across articles with Controversy sections separate to the History section. Links not to hand but could add them as I come across them if wanted though I think you will have seen some. I think the 'Controversies' should be integrated into History. Having separate sections seems to dramatise part of history which is just part of the flow of life. Editors with axes to grind may wish to downplay unpleasantness or promote it depending on their PoV by having a separate section. Have you any thoughts with reference to policy or guidelines? Best wishes. SovalValtos ( talk) 18:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
I came across this [1] possible source via a news item. I would not like to see it being used on its own without being balanced by other sourced opinions as it seems to push a particular PoV. How about population growth, global warming or nuclear war as being equal or graver tests for the world if not UN? Is there a means of establishing whether a linked source such as this has been used so as to be able to give an alternative? Best wishes. SovalValtos ( talk) 20:36, 11 April 2020 (UTC)