This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Caorongjin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
C.Fred (
talk) 07:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Liferay, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/about. As a copyright violation, Liferay appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Liferay has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Liferay. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Liferay, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 07:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I started the entry on Liferay without any intentions of anything illegal or anything of that nature. C.Fred warned me of a violation and to change the content as it was considered a copyright infringement. Though I did not think so (the company is an MIT license open source firm), I am not as strong as others on copyright laws and obliged such a comment. Hence, I went in and rewrote the vast majority of the article. It was deleted within a few minutes of that. So, I thought I would resubmit my rewrite. But that was flagged and deleted as being a "blatant advertisement." I determined by that time that I did not know how to write something that was suitable for Wikipedia on Liferay and hence stopped. I then cleared the content of my talk page because I thought everything was done with. Evidently, I still am displeasing the community. In reality, I am very frustrated now and do not want to contribute anymore to Wikipedia (beyond the little that I have already). Perhaps it is better for this account to simply be closed. Please advise. Caorongjin 03:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Again, as I explained, the first time the article was deleted, it was because the text of the article was lifted verbatim from the product's page elsewhere (copyvio). The second time, it was because it was a subject that had previously been considered and deleted, and recreating an article with no apparent change from its previous condition. Now, if this were the article's first go-round, it might have been tagged with {{ unreferenced}}, although it could still have been subject to speedy deletion per WP:WEB.
As far as the sources, the first three are exactly what's good to support articles with: major-press coverage of a non-trivial nature: i.e. a full product review. By and large, blogs are not reliable sources, though the Infoworld one might, on casual consideration, have the best shot. Certainly there's enough to start a new draft of the article, probably at a user subpage (e.g. User:Caorongjin/Liferay); get it cleaned up and in good shape; and then present it to deletion review to get the article recreated. — C.Fred ( talk) 05:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I've made a few edits to the article to show you where I see it needs to go. I'll be able to look at it some more this evening (US Eastern time). As far as the citations, if you expand anything and directly cite a source, note which one, and I will write the syntax for the citation. (What will happen is a footnote will appear in the text, and a numbered item will show up in the references list.) — C.Fred ( talk) 14:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I've started discussion on the new candidate article at Talk:Liferay. We'll see if responses come in and how it progresses from there. — C.Fred ( talk) 04:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Liferay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Caorongjin. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:Liferay.png) was found at the following location: User:Caorongjin/Liferay. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 05:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our
policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Liferay, Inc., to Wikipedia, you will be
blocked.
Matt/TheFearow
(Talk)
(Contribs)
(Bot) 21:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, my warning was invalid, I struck it. Also, I hope you dont mind, I added some information I found to the article. It hopefully helps! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi --
As you may (or may not) have noticed, I've started to build on the strong foundations in Bible translations into Chinese and hope to take a step forward. I notice that you made a number of good edits, and I wonder if you can supply some of the sources you used and perhaps make footnotes, which would be needed to make this a Good Article. Cheers and thank you for your work on the article, ch ( talk) 03:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Caorongjin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —
C.Fred (
talk) 07:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Liferay, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.liferay.com/web/guest/about. As a copyright violation, Liferay appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Liferay has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Liferay. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Liferay, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — C.Fred ( talk) 07:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello. I started the entry on Liferay without any intentions of anything illegal or anything of that nature. C.Fred warned me of a violation and to change the content as it was considered a copyright infringement. Though I did not think so (the company is an MIT license open source firm), I am not as strong as others on copyright laws and obliged such a comment. Hence, I went in and rewrote the vast majority of the article. It was deleted within a few minutes of that. So, I thought I would resubmit my rewrite. But that was flagged and deleted as being a "blatant advertisement." I determined by that time that I did not know how to write something that was suitable for Wikipedia on Liferay and hence stopped. I then cleared the content of my talk page because I thought everything was done with. Evidently, I still am displeasing the community. In reality, I am very frustrated now and do not want to contribute anymore to Wikipedia (beyond the little that I have already). Perhaps it is better for this account to simply be closed. Please advise. Caorongjin 03:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Again, as I explained, the first time the article was deleted, it was because the text of the article was lifted verbatim from the product's page elsewhere (copyvio). The second time, it was because it was a subject that had previously been considered and deleted, and recreating an article with no apparent change from its previous condition. Now, if this were the article's first go-round, it might have been tagged with {{ unreferenced}}, although it could still have been subject to speedy deletion per WP:WEB.
As far as the sources, the first three are exactly what's good to support articles with: major-press coverage of a non-trivial nature: i.e. a full product review. By and large, blogs are not reliable sources, though the Infoworld one might, on casual consideration, have the best shot. Certainly there's enough to start a new draft of the article, probably at a user subpage (e.g. User:Caorongjin/Liferay); get it cleaned up and in good shape; and then present it to deletion review to get the article recreated. — C.Fred ( talk) 05:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I've made a few edits to the article to show you where I see it needs to go. I'll be able to look at it some more this evening (US Eastern time). As far as the citations, if you expand anything and directly cite a source, note which one, and I will write the syntax for the citation. (What will happen is a footnote will appear in the text, and a numbered item will show up in the references list.) — C.Fred ( talk) 14:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
I've started discussion on the new candidate article at Talk:Liferay. We'll see if responses come in and how it progresses from there. — C.Fred ( talk) 04:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Liferay.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 13:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Caorongjin. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image ( Image:Liferay.png) was found at the following location: User:Caorongjin/Liferay. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot) -talk 05:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our
policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as
Liferay, Inc., to Wikipedia, you will be
blocked.
Matt/TheFearow
(Talk)
(Contribs)
(Bot) 21:45, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Ok, my warning was invalid, I struck it. Also, I hope you dont mind, I added some information I found to the article. It hopefully helps! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:32, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi --
As you may (or may not) have noticed, I've started to build on the strong foundations in Bible translations into Chinese and hope to take a step forward. I notice that you made a number of good edits, and I wonder if you can supply some of the sources you used and perhaps make footnotes, which would be needed to make this a Good Article. Cheers and thank you for your work on the article, ch ( talk) 03:13, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |