Welcome!
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese nationality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Flag Icons are not accepted in Canadian settlement boxes see Talk:Vancouver/GA1 for a example. They have been slowly being removed form Canadian statements. This would is a issue when a article is assessed for quality.
In WP:INFOBOXFLAG it states; Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many. ...the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not.
Overall consensus for Canadian settlements is to not to include them. Cheers - Kyle1278 ( talk) 05:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, most discussions about flags for Mos are found here Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. There has never been a complete '100%' consensus, but through the archive it shows editors largely against them in infoboxs. If you feel that they should be added back, please start a discussion on the subject here Talk: Calgary. Cheers - Kyle1278 ( talk) 06:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exit-Entry Permit for Travelling to and from Hong Kong and Macau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hukou. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For the detailed work with the Chinese visa articles. -- Norvikk ( talk) 20:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visa policy of Mongolia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tögrög. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
|
The PRC Barnstar | |
| Dear friend, for contribution to the development of Chinese visa articles. Thank you | ||
| this WikiAward was given to C-GAUN by Norvikk ( talk) on 10:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hi
I have cancelled your editing about Belarus. It is rather reliable source.
[1] Look on the left side first Press Release.
Have a nice day. --
Norvikk (
talk) 12:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. [survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. [survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
References
You can find more information about
this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this
privacy statement. Please visit our
frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! -- EGalvez (WMF) ( talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! -- EGalvez (WMF) ( talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Please leave your opinion here Talk:Visa requirements for Georgian citizens#RfC for map usage. Your view will have more significance regarding the issue. Thanks. -- Norvikk ( talk) 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
We fully understand the difference between two type of passport. We are not satisfied with your explanation from the previous reply. For some countries that specify mention the visa policy of BNO passport, such as USA, Qatar, UAE, Brunei, so we cannot edit those countries as visa free. For other countries that only specify the visa free status of British nationals implies it offers BNO passport visa free. The IATA information may not be 100% correct. We heard many case that can enter Ukraine with BNO passports without any problem.
For Macau SAR passport always recognized as China passport for foreign officials, that's because the cover is very similar to the ordinary China passport and the nationality is Chinese which shown in the information page. We notice that there are a number of countries that offers visa free to China nationals, which implies the China nationality shown in the passport. We never say the Macau passport is equivalent to China passport. Practically, the Macau passport holders can treat as China passport holders, also enjoy the visa free to other countries that the China passport cannot have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinho12345678 ( talk • contribs) 05:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Who is we? Why do you keep saying "we"? El_C 07:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visa policy of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padang Besar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs ( talk) 04:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
We have another crisis over at Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong. Again someone is claiming that the fact that there is no HK specifically listed is irrelevant as this is why we say Chinese citizens of Hong Kong, China covers it all. Would appreciate if you could talk some sense into this.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 13:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- On it. Christ, these people are persistently annoying.
C-GAUN (
talk) 12:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. Now a request for comment was opened on Talk:Visa_requirements_for_Chinese_citizens_of_Hong_Kong#Discussing_edit_war. Could you please try and explain once again the nuances of Chinese citizenship there as you did on the Macau page, I would appreciate it.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 15:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.
You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg ( talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Magnolia677 (
talk) 22:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I see we have our IP hopping postal code vandal back, the on who keeps moving the postal code to after the country name in defiance of all addressing standards. I've protected some of the articles they're hitting, but if you see more feel free to let me know. Canterbury Tail talk 17:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- @
Canterbury Tail: Much appreciated. I will keep directing him to the official Canada Post guideline and hope they will come to their senses.
C-GAUN (
talk) 00:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not just Canada Post guidelines, which do indeed apply since the articles are about Canada, but general international addressing standards always have the country last. Canterbury Tail talk 00:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I think you might be interested in this - Template talk:Timatic.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 20:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Could you check relevance of information and make changes if it is necessary? Editing will be reflected automatically in the visa articles. Template:Transcluded sections for the visa articles Thanks. -- Norvikk ( talk) 12:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Please have a look at [2]. Is this ever going to end?-- Twofortnights ( talk) 10:59, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you don't mind me joining in. It's always the same editor disrupting the same articles over and over again like in [3]. I don't know why he always tries to add Macau when the SAR is not mentioned as visa exempt at all from any of the articles provided. I was trying to catch him through his talk page but it looks like he is now blocked for a second time. I don't know if he is gonna learn his lesson after the second block because he still didn't change his behaviour after his first block. RoboTitan28 ( talk) 23:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- This is frustrating and has been going on for at least a year. IMHO, aside from blocking there's really no better way to deal with this. C-GAUN ( talk) 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right of abode (United Kingdom), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permanent residence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Welcome!
|
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited British Hong Kong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese nationality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
Flag Icons are not accepted in Canadian settlement boxes see Talk:Vancouver/GA1 for a example. They have been slowly being removed form Canadian statements. This would is a issue when a article is assessed for quality.
In WP:INFOBOXFLAG it states; Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many. ...the consensus of editors at that article will determine whether flag use in the infobox is preferred or not.
Overall consensus for Canadian settlements is to not to include them. Cheers - Kyle1278 ( talk) 05:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
- No problem, most discussions about flags for Mos are found here Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. There has never been a complete '100%' consensus, but through the archive it shows editors largely against them in infoboxs. If you feel that they should be added back, please start a discussion on the subject here Talk: Calgary. Cheers - Kyle1278 ( talk) 06:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exit-Entry Permit for Travelling to and from Hong Kong and Macau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hukou. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar |
| For the detailed work with the Chinese visa articles. -- Norvikk ( talk) 20:48, 24 June 2016 (UTC) |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visa policy of Mongolia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tögrög. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:37, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
|
|
The PRC Barnstar | |
| Dear friend, for contribution to the development of Chinese visa articles. Thank you | ||
| this WikiAward was given to C-GAUN by Norvikk ( talk) on 10:16, 2 September 2016 (UTC) |
Hi
I have cancelled your editing about Belarus. It is rather reliable source.
[1] Look on the left side first Press Release.
Have a nice day. --
Norvikk (
talk) 12:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. [survey 1] The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. [survey 2] The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
References
You can find more information about
this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this
privacy statement. Please visit our
frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! -- EGalvez (WMF) ( talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! -- EGalvez (WMF) ( talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Please leave your opinion here Talk:Visa requirements for Georgian citizens#RfC for map usage. Your view will have more significance regarding the issue. Thanks. -- Norvikk ( talk) 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Dear Sir,
We fully understand the difference between two type of passport. We are not satisfied with your explanation from the previous reply. For some countries that specify mention the visa policy of BNO passport, such as USA, Qatar, UAE, Brunei, so we cannot edit those countries as visa free. For other countries that only specify the visa free status of British nationals implies it offers BNO passport visa free. The IATA information may not be 100% correct. We heard many case that can enter Ukraine with BNO passports without any problem.
For Macau SAR passport always recognized as China passport for foreign officials, that's because the cover is very similar to the ordinary China passport and the nationality is Chinese which shown in the information page. We notice that there are a number of countries that offers visa free to China nationals, which implies the China nationality shown in the passport. We never say the Macau passport is equivalent to China passport. Practically, the Macau passport holders can treat as China passport holders, also enjoy the visa free to other countries that the China passport cannot have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinho12345678 ( talk • contribs) 05:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Who is we? Why do you keep saying "we"? El_C 07:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visa policy of Malaysia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Padang Besar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:58, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs ( talk) 04:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stateless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
We have another crisis over at Visa requirements for Chinese citizens of Hong Kong. Again someone is claiming that the fact that there is no HK specifically listed is irrelevant as this is why we say Chinese citizens of Hong Kong, China covers it all. Would appreciate if you could talk some sense into this.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 13:35, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
- On it. Christ, these people are persistently annoying.
C-GAUN (
talk) 12:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hi. Now a request for comment was opened on Talk:Visa_requirements_for_Chinese_citizens_of_Hong_Kong#Discussing_edit_war. Could you please try and explain once again the nuances of Chinese citizenship there as you did on the Macau page, I would appreciate it.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 15:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada will soon be reaching its first-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and no unsourced claims.
You may submit articles using this link for convenience. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg ( talk) 18:13, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting
Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks!
Magnolia677 (
talk) 22:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I see we have our IP hopping postal code vandal back, the on who keeps moving the postal code to after the country name in defiance of all addressing standards. I've protected some of the articles they're hitting, but if you see more feel free to let me know. Canterbury Tail talk 17:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- @
Canterbury Tail: Much appreciated. I will keep directing him to the official Canada Post guideline and hope they will come to their senses.
C-GAUN (
talk) 00:02, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not just Canada Post guidelines, which do indeed apply since the articles are about Canada, but general international addressing standards always have the country last. Canterbury Tail talk 00:05, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I think you might be interested in this - Template talk:Timatic.-- Twofortnights ( talk) 20:46, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Could you check relevance of information and make changes if it is necessary? Editing will be reflected automatically in the visa articles. Template:Transcluded sections for the visa articles Thanks. -- Norvikk ( talk) 12:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Please have a look at [2]. Is this ever going to end?-- Twofortnights ( talk) 10:59, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I hope you don't mind me joining in. It's always the same editor disrupting the same articles over and over again like in [3]. I don't know why he always tries to add Macau when the SAR is not mentioned as visa exempt at all from any of the articles provided. I was trying to catch him through his talk page but it looks like he is now blocked for a second time. I don't know if he is gonna learn his lesson after the second block because he still didn't change his behaviour after his first block. RoboTitan28 ( talk) 23:07, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
- This is frustrating and has been going on for at least a year. IMHO, aside from blocking there's really no better way to deal with this. C-GAUN ( talk) 03:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Right of abode (United Kingdom), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permanent residence ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:19, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, C-GAUN. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |