| This is Bravo Foxtrot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
I don't know if you have gone back to Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol to see my response to your comment, so I thought I'd nudge you: You're right, but darned if I can find a source to support how the article should look. Are you knowledgeable enough to do a better job? - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 18:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
When i started this account, it was a stupid joke. I made mean articles about my relatives.
But, later, i decided to use WP for good. Good. I created a page for my local phone company (without them requesting one), have edited various slang articles, have clarified dozens of different articles, and have edited important ones, even ones about chemistry elements! I just want to make Wiki a better place. I rely on it for lots of information, and want to give back. I have stopped the joke edits. I have even REVERTED other peoples bad edits. please, cleanse my reputation by removing all VAND related posts to my talk.
PS Do not post anything to my IP address.
pps. even if i Do get blocked,will I still be able to READ wikipedia?
ppps what is the difference between VAND and OR? Ticklewickleukulele ( talk) 04:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm very confused about the current state of the Terra-3 article - it's not clear which events the refactoring are referring to. Can you have a look at the talk page? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 20:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Hanged, drawn and quartered where I have listed your dispute at Hanged, drawn and quartered.
If you make an edit and it is reverted you should follow the WP:BRD cycle and initiate a conversation on the talk page about your proposed changes and try to reach a consensus for any changes that are to be made. -- PBS ( talk) 09:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on the Type 94 Nambu pistol. I completely forgot about the Miller reference and got some pretty good information from the book. Just a few things I wanted to touch base with you about on the referencing. I tend to avoid gun blogs and websites for references as their information tends to be INCREDIBLY wrong from poor fact checking and everyone claiming to be an expert on firearms, along with failing WP:Reliable. The accuracy of the pistol.=, although poor compared to other weapons, is subjective to the user, with many western shooters unable to properly hold or fire the weapon as it was made for people with smaller hands. The Nambu round itself is not particularly underpowered when compared to round made during the time period and should not be addressed as such in the article. You also to appear to have cited info not in the reference material which you should try to avoid doing. Again thanks for the help, it is good to see another editor interested in Japanese firearms. -- Molestash ( talk) 18:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
| This is Bravo Foxtrot's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
I don't know if you have gone back to Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol to see my response to your comment, so I thought I'd nudge you: You're right, but darned if I can find a source to support how the article should look. Are you knowledgeable enough to do a better job? - DavidWBrooks ( talk) 18:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
When i started this account, it was a stupid joke. I made mean articles about my relatives.
But, later, i decided to use WP for good. Good. I created a page for my local phone company (without them requesting one), have edited various slang articles, have clarified dozens of different articles, and have edited important ones, even ones about chemistry elements! I just want to make Wiki a better place. I rely on it for lots of information, and want to give back. I have stopped the joke edits. I have even REVERTED other peoples bad edits. please, cleanse my reputation by removing all VAND related posts to my talk.
PS Do not post anything to my IP address.
pps. even if i Do get blocked,will I still be able to READ wikipedia?
ppps what is the difference between VAND and OR? Ticklewickleukulele ( talk) 04:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm very confused about the current state of the Terra-3 article - it's not clear which events the refactoring are referring to. Can you have a look at the talk page? Maury Markowitz ( talk) 20:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Hanged, drawn and quartered where I have listed your dispute at Hanged, drawn and quartered.
If you make an edit and it is reverted you should follow the WP:BRD cycle and initiate a conversation on the talk page about your proposed changes and try to reach a consensus for any changes that are to be made. -- PBS ( talk) 09:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the help on the Type 94 Nambu pistol. I completely forgot about the Miller reference and got some pretty good information from the book. Just a few things I wanted to touch base with you about on the referencing. I tend to avoid gun blogs and websites for references as their information tends to be INCREDIBLY wrong from poor fact checking and everyone claiming to be an expert on firearms, along with failing WP:Reliable. The accuracy of the pistol.=, although poor compared to other weapons, is subjective to the user, with many western shooters unable to properly hold or fire the weapon as it was made for people with smaller hands. The Nambu round itself is not particularly underpowered when compared to round made during the time period and should not be addressed as such in the article. You also to appear to have cited info not in the reference material which you should try to avoid doing. Again thanks for the help, it is good to see another editor interested in Japanese firearms. -- Molestash ( talk) 18:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)