Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Oscar Seborer instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article. This draft is less complete than the article, but will be replaced with a redirect to the existing article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oscar Seborer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oscar Seborer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 11:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon ( talk) 11:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi, yes when I submitted the draft, there wasn't anything yet. I do think some of the sources I found aren't used yet. I would be worth moving those to the article Bquast ( talk) 12:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World Health Organization, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICT.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:09, 26 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Hallo, Thank you for creating GIGA (United Nations). When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie GIGA), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find the new article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one. Thanks, and Happy Editing. Pam D 13:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much, sorry I'm aware of this, but I forgot Bquast ( talk) 13:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anouar Maârouf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 01:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Video chapter, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 14:45, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Padgriffin, the article already had 3 competing sources (copied below), I was just adding the independent sources. Do you think you could just give me a minute to get everything ready instead of delete it within 3 minutes? Bquast ( talk) 14:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply

References Edit

1. ^
2. ^
3. ^ "Using manual chapters with videos on Stream (on SharePoint)". support.microsoft.com. Archived from the original on 2022-08-03. Retrieved 2022-08-03.

Bquast ( talk) 14:50, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Please use draftspace to work on a brand-new article prior to pushing it to mainspace. As it stands, the article does not meet GNG and doesn't have any reliable, independent sources, and thus should not remain in mainspace. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 14:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply

@ Padgriffin, yes, I was just about to add those. It was not necessary to delete it within 5 minutes. Plenty of articles are created without first being draft, there is no rule about this. The subject meets GNG, add the sources would have been there in minutes, I fail to see how you are making Wikipedia better with this artion. Maybe that is not your objective Bquast ( talk) 15:02, 3 August 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Static web page, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hugo, Jekyll and Python.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC) reply

tnx fixed Bquast ( talk) Bquast ( talk) 09:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC) reply

I happened to come across the page trustworthy AI where you seem to have made the most edits. To my understanding, trustworthy AI is a term widely used in academic articles and also by industry. In your edits, you appear to reduce the term to denominate a programme of work involving the UN. I would be interested in making the page more about the phenomena of trustworthy AI than the description of a programme, but I do not want to stumble in without discussing it with you first. So, what do you say? Johna ( talk) 08:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi Johna, I appreciate the feedback. In future, it would be easier for others if you start such a discussion on the talk page of the article itself. While I did research and create this page, there is group on wikipedians maintaining it. A couple of points to note:

1. This is not a page involving the UN, rather it is a joint programme of work of two UN agencies.
2. This is about a programme of the UN not just for Member States, but rather for all of industry to standardize these technologies for all of society, academia, and industry. I wouldn't like to think of this as me reducing, rather, the articles describes the public interest programme under the name they established years ago.
3. Trustworthy AI is a really specific phrase, much more so than e.g. "Trust AI" , "Trusted AI", etc. it refers to the phrase which was developed for this programme together with Baroness O'Neill (and indeed, inevitably has been copied by corporate entities, which is not beyond question in and of itself).
4. from researching trustworthy AI for the creation of this article, I did not in fact find any specific phenomenon (singular). I did find multiple phenomena that also use this phrase (plural). We could create new articles for these, e.g. "Trustworthy AI (explanainability)", "Trustworthy AI (representation) together with a disambiguation page. We should then add a disambiguation template to this article.

We could consider adding other collective iniatives that genuinely work in the public interest (not whitewashing commercial interests). A section "Other uses" would be the established way to do so.

Private entity promotion is not an objective of wikipedia, if you would like to do this, then I suggest creating new articles, e.g. "Trustworthy AI (Microsoft Corporation)", "Trustworthy AI (Amazon)". I can help with this. I would by happy to create a disambiguation page and link to that from the TwAI article (or the see also section if you think that is better) Bquast ( talk) 10:17, 1 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Thanks for creating Natural intelligence. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 04:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi @ MPGuy2824, just to clarify, I did not create that page. I noticed that the page where was an Israel marketing company (in the field of AI). That was confusing, so I moved it. I then tried to put a placeholder as best I could (until I could improve it). If you prefer not a have a placeholder, that is also fine. I will try to improve the page if I have time. Bquast ( talk) 11:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Duality Technologies, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. echidnaLives - talk - edits 01:42, 25 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello @ EchidnaLives it's about a research lab that produced two pieces of software (the most widely used ones). There is an article in Futune, there is an article on funding from Eric Schmidt. They have 2 Godel prize winners as founders. It seems to me plenty relevant, and all of it is there in the article. The competing software products are from Microsoft and Intel, they do have wikipedia pages. The idea was to level the field a bit in this market where trust is something very important. I attempted to do that, I guess now it won't happen. What an amazing outcome Bquast ( talk) 14:16, 25 November 2022 (UTC) reply

When something is moved to draftspace, you should not create a copy of that article in mainspace - you should fix the problems in draft space. MrOllie ( talk) 14:51, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

@ MrOllie I did exactly that. I fixed the (quite questionable) objection that there were insufficient reputable sources. I added those in draftspace. After that I copied the "fixed" article to mainspace.

The reason given to move to draftspace was "insufficient sources" that was simply not true, it had 3 reputable sources, all with very complete references and the content was more than suffiiciently notable. ~~~ Bquast ( talk) 18:21, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

No, you created a duplicate. You should fix the draft and then submit it for review. MrOllie ( talk) 18:48, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Why should I submit it for review. I created an article from a red link that was completely valid. It was deleted under false pretenses, by a user who has been on Wikipedia less than a year. I nevertheless made the required improvements. Why does it have to wait 2 months for publication, when it was deleted without a valid reason Bquast ( talk) 18:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Because it was moved to draft space because it did not meet Wikipedia's minimum inclusion critera. I see that this is not the first time you have done a cut and paste like this - please use the processes as they are intended to be used. Basically, any time you find yourself cutting and pasting an entire article, you are doing something wrong - it breaks the article histories. I'm surprised you don't know this already, given how long you have been on Wikipedia. MrOllie ( talk) 19:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

But it did meet the minimum criteria. Just because an account with less than a year made that claim, doesn't make it so Bquast ( talk) 19:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

It obviously does not. It has been deleted at AFD once already, and I have no doubt that it would be deleted again in its present form. MrOllie ( talk) 20:29, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. Thank you for your work on Zvika Brakerski. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

@ SunDawn thank you for the message, much appreciated. You never know when articles are just dismissed Bquast ( talk) 14:27, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{ request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. MrOllie ( talk) 14:52, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

@ MrOllie your accusation is wrong and baseless. I have no external relation with them. I know of them, as I follow the work of the community. I wouldn't make an article on a subject that I know nothing about, but if knowing something about the subject makes it a conflict of interest then how can anything ever be done?

I work for the ITU, the United Nations Specialized Agency for ICT. This is an ICT subject, that is the extend of the link. My interest in the subject is personal, is that acceptable? Otherwise because of my employer I am disqualified from writing anything about ICT? Separate to this, I wonder if there was anything in the article that was objectional? promotional?

I don't appreciate the insinuation that I am somehow paid or for this. It is not true, and there is not reason to make such an accusation.

I created this article in good faith, to offset a bit the imbalance that exists by the other competitors being MNOs. The moving to draftspace was grossly overzealous. Yet, again in good faith, I fixed it and put the "fixed" article in mainspace.

I've been editing wikipedia for 15 years, I have never been accussed of anything like editing for money. I think it is really lamentable when an article is created like this, has a lot of merit. Was removed for a reason that is not really valid. And when I act again in good fait, I get accused of pushing this for money.

I think you could have look at the article, looked at the history, noticed that the reason for moving was not valid.

In anycase, you win, this article won't exist then, the tech monopolists will greatly appeciate it. Bquast ( talk) 18:35, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

And no one has accused you of editing for money today. Please re-read the above message (which is a standard template message for this situation) carefully. There are many sorts of conflicts of interest. For example, if you work with Duality Technology people during your work for the ITU ( for example), that would be a COI even though they are not paying you. MrOllie ( talk) 18:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seizo Onoe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akashi.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 12 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Video chapter, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 18:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tomas Lamanauskas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tomas Lamanauskas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Renata• 3 01:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Simao Campos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:11, 14 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi, I had noticed your notice on the article earlier. I meant to explain, the notability is not as an academic, but as an expert that led the creation of the standards JPEG, H.264, H.265 and many others. Bquast ( talk) 11:33, 14 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natural intelligence, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:17, 2 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Natural intelligence".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Duality Technologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 05:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Video chapter".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:08, 20 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello Bquast, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, DeepLearning.AI, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DeepLearning.AI.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone ( talk) 16:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Microsoft Research, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AI for Earth.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AI for Good Specialization, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AI for Good Specialization until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. Thank you for your work on Accelerated Linear Algebra. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 ( talk) 20:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to This Naked Mind. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Just i yaya 03:42, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hiya, note that forbes contributors are not reliable. Please ping me if you have any questions. Just i yaya 03:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bquast. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Simao Campos".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 03:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply