|
Kuki ni 21:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Just noticed you are a bot. My bad! Kuki ni 21:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Does it make sense to have the bot correct spelling on talk pages? Such as here -- Ravedave 19:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I also strongly agree that the bot shouldn't touch talk pages. Comments should be left in their initial integrity, no matter what. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk?) 02:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm with the people above. Changing text, even making spelling corrections, to text which people have signed as their own, is inappropriate. I'd suggest that your bot stick to the article space. kmccoy (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Just adding my support to those people saying that this bot should not be allowed on talk pages. violet/riga (t) 17:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I also object to this bot editing talk pages. It's not about whether the edits are an improvement on the original words, it's about misrepresentation; my signature at the end of a comment tells readers that those are my words. I would rather see my signature attached to errors of my own making than to things I didn't write. -- Calair 01:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
as per the discussions above and your bot's edits here I have to insist that you keep it off talk pages at least until you can get further input on whether it is appropriate. I definitely think the bot's changes are probably harmless but in general it is bad to modify other people's comments at all. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 17:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I think that correcting spelling on talk pages is undesirable, but not necessarily broken. However, you must agree that it diverts resources from the primary task, of correcting spelling in articles.
Bluap 01:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, it seems that you are running a bot called User:Bot-maru, without any authorization to do so. Please seek approval from WP:BRFA before continuing. Thank you. -- light darkness ( talk) 17:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC) Posting on bot page too in hopes it stops the bot.
I have blocked this bot until the above issues are straightened out. It continues to edit talk pages despite many, many requests to the contrary—thus it's reasonable to view it as broken. Please don't unblock it until this is fixed, and issues of proper authorization are cleared up. -- SCZenz 17:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
|
Kuki ni 21:04, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Just noticed you are a bot. My bad! Kuki ni 21:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Does it make sense to have the bot correct spelling on talk pages? Such as here -- Ravedave 19:57, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
I also strongly agree that the bot shouldn't touch talk pages. Comments should be left in their initial integrity, no matter what. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk?) 02:47, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm with the people above. Changing text, even making spelling corrections, to text which people have signed as their own, is inappropriate. I'd suggest that your bot stick to the article space. kmccoy (talk) 05:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Just adding my support to those people saying that this bot should not be allowed on talk pages. violet/riga (t) 17:13, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I also object to this bot editing talk pages. It's not about whether the edits are an improvement on the original words, it's about misrepresentation; my signature at the end of a comment tells readers that those are my words. I would rather see my signature attached to errors of my own making than to things I didn't write. -- Calair 01:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
as per the discussions above and your bot's edits here I have to insist that you keep it off talk pages at least until you can get further input on whether it is appropriate. I definitely think the bot's changes are probably harmless but in general it is bad to modify other people's comments at all. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 17:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Personally, I think that correcting spelling on talk pages is undesirable, but not necessarily broken. However, you must agree that it diverts resources from the primary task, of correcting spelling in articles.
Bluap 01:16, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello, it seems that you are running a bot called User:Bot-maru, without any authorization to do so. Please seek approval from WP:BRFA before continuing. Thank you. -- light darkness ( talk) 17:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC) Posting on bot page too in hopes it stops the bot.
I have blocked this bot until the above issues are straightened out. It continues to edit talk pages despite many, many requests to the contrary—thus it's reasonable to view it as broken. Please don't unblock it until this is fixed, and issues of proper authorization are cleared up. -- SCZenz 17:28, 21 May 2006 (UTC)