I received an email from this blocked user requesting unblock. I'm going to go on record now as stating that I don't believe a word of this, I feel it actually is more evidence that it is who I thought, and they should have email revoked as well. Any admin considering unblocking is welcome to ask me anything they like about this, I'm sure I can explain my reasoning to your satisfaction. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Bob thegamepro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am contesting the block per Wiki: Duck as I am not User Mcjakeqcool, and unlike User Mcjakeqcool I make edits about Music(e.g Vanilla's No Way No Way), Tissues(e.g Kruger tissues), Coffee(e.g Maxwell House) and TV shows (e.g X Factor) also I am not able to edit my talk page, to contest my block without using my eMail adress, I struggle to acsess my talk page and there was no investigation to even prove that I am a sock of Mcjakeqcool(apart from Wikipeida ANI which I could not attend) Infact this is a form of racism. You are not only dishonoring me but also Mcjakeqcool, please stop.
Decline reason:
You're doing a good job of dishonoring yourself. Whether or not you're Mcjakeqcool is irrelevant at this juncture, since you have just accused the administrators (who acted in good faith) of racism. Wikipedia has no room for such accusations, and for that I am declining this unblock request, immaterial of the merits of the sockpuppetry. — Jeremy ( v^_^v Boribori!) 22:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AfD nomination of Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 09:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I received an email from this blocked user requesting unblock. I'm going to go on record now as stating that I don't believe a word of this, I feel it actually is more evidence that it is who I thought, and they should have email revoked as well. Any admin considering unblocking is welcome to ask me anything they like about this, I'm sure I can explain my reasoning to your satisfaction. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Bob thegamepro ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am contesting the block per Wiki: Duck as I am not User Mcjakeqcool, and unlike User Mcjakeqcool I make edits about Music(e.g Vanilla's No Way No Way), Tissues(e.g Kruger tissues), Coffee(e.g Maxwell House) and TV shows (e.g X Factor) also I am not able to edit my talk page, to contest my block without using my eMail adress, I struggle to acsess my talk page and there was no investigation to even prove that I am a sock of Mcjakeqcool(apart from Wikipeida ANI which I could not attend) Infact this is a form of racism. You are not only dishonoring me but also Mcjakeqcool, please stop.
Decline reason:
You're doing a good job of dishonoring yourself. Whether or not you're Mcjakeqcool is irrelevant at this juncture, since you have just accused the administrators (who acted in good faith) of racism. Wikipedia has no room for such accusations, and for that I am declining this unblock request, immaterial of the merits of the sockpuppetry. — Jeremy ( v^_^v Boribori!) 22:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AfD nomination of Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob the Builder: Can We Fix It? / Tweenies: Game Time. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 09:18, 18 January 2010 (UTC)