This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, you may post on WP:RFPP, per concurrence of admins on IRC. Alternately, you can just ask me to protect the page in question. — Kurykh 02:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh man, I'm really sorry about that. I was trying to get a better picture, but I screwed up. I'm really sorry. Chris wikiguru ( talk) 06:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, there's nothing that says an article can't be speedy tagged while also at AfD. If something turns out to meet a speedy criterion, then it would only make sense to tag it, even if it's already at AfD too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 03:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Just so you know, User:Illadelph halflifeis a sock of User:TyrusThomas4lyf, who is a long time abuser. Chris! c t 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Seems the sock reported you at WP:AIV, figured I let you know. Not sure why he would do that. Momusufan ( talk) 04:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Since it appears Shuanggen has not listened to you, I have nominated his userpage for MfD here. - Jéské ( v^_^v :L14 Grarrl Barbarian) 05:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey BoL,
Thanks for all your hard work trying to help out User:Shuanggen Jin. I just noticed your revert of their talk page blanking and wanted to stop by to let you know that blanking your own talk page is generally allowed under WP:TALK#User talk pages. Naturally, it does tend to make it a little bit harder to tell what warnings a user has received, but in every discussion I've seen about it on ANI, the general consensus has been that it's allowed.
Anyways, just thought I'd stop by and let you know. Thanks, and keep up the hard work! -- jonny- m t 04:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for alerting me of the ANI post! Bestchai ( talk) 23:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
There's no need to be taunting users like you did on his talk page. If it's a vandal, don't sink to their level. Metros ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
You said in my talk page that wikipedia is not a free web host. I know that. Where have you found an advertisement for my userpage??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTA Ganxtaize ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 14 March 2008
I'm sorry about treating Wikipedia as a social network. I didn't know that showing her a link elsewhere on here was talking. I won't do that again. Thanks for telling me too.-- Lover of Itachi ( talk) 15:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand what you added on my talk. What is the mainspace? The whole of wikipedia? I just don't understand. If you mean I havn't edited any pages. It's because on my home computer Wiki doesn't work. I only get on Wikipedia at school. Therefore, I have no time to edit anything at school unless I want to fail. So forgive me as of now I will start editing things once my main computer at home works. -- Lover of Itachi ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi BoL:
Thanks for your offer of a third opinion at Talk:Muhammad. I think further input would be helpful. I added a more detailed note at Talk:Muhammad.
It is a bit confusing because the discussion is at Talk:Muhammad; the wording under discussion is at Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. Wanderer57 ( talk) 12:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi BoL: I appreciate your effort to clue me in about 3O procedure ("If this is your first time doing a 3O, the case will be on the IRC channel (Link). If you wish, the mediation may commence on 03:00 (UTC). ")
Unfortunately, I am not able to understand this information because 1) I've never used IRC and don't know how to, and 2} I was under the impression (from very very limited experience) that 3O opinions were given through comments in the normal Wikipedia Talk pages.
Wanderer57 ( talk) 02:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
3rd opinion is not supposed to be mediation. Its exactly what it sounds like, an extra outside opinion to try to bring in fresh views. There is no "case" and certainly no need for an IRC channel (even actual mediation can be done on talk pages). Mr. Z-man 02:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Are you saying that all it needs is some references? Kitty53 ( talk) 04:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 22:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 22:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
When posting reports on WP:UAA, please use {{ user-uaa}}, not {{ userlinks}}. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way to get that account renamed? I don't want anyone associating me with that account. (It's not mine, fwiw). Keilana| Parlez ici 15:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Arthur C. Trumbo, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{ prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Redfarmer ( talk) 02:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Removing_topic_ban_on_Blow_of_Light_-_Finalise.3F I have unprotected your userpage. I would like to remind you that even though the ban has been lifted, other editors will still probably watch your edits and be less forgiving should you violate a policy. Otherwise, welcome back and happy editing. MBisanz talk 08:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your comments on User:Lookinhere: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Look, you and Lookinhere really need to get over your personal problems and stop attacking each other, stop, please. -- Atyndall93 ( talk | contribs) 04:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 06:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy Bunny to you too! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travellingcari ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 23 March 2008
This is about your recent reversion of Springfield High School (Tennessee) to an earlier version by Ivyleaguetds. However, the version you reverted from was from the same author, and seemed to be a legitimate edit. There were a few empty categories, but I assume that the author was simply waiting and taking the page editing step-by-step, perhaps unaware of the 3-edit rule. So I'm reverting the artice back to the author's newest, which includes info about the school's organization and possible future info on other things. Rohan ( talk) 04:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
I put in the Admin request for protection. That guy isn't just removing the tags, he's adding blanket POV and made up info without references. I think you should leave the content as-is per my last revisions until he can actually come up with real sources, or this article will never be referenced whatsoever. I've been painstakingly referencing three or four other big articles recently, he can do the same. Some of that info is speculative at best. 74.228.158.68 ( talk) 04:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 20:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
You had previously reverted conflict of interest edits by (now indef-blocked) Thpcomm ( talk · contribs). An acknowledged sockpuppet of that user, Crystal08 ( talk · contribs), has appeared and reverted back to the conflict of interest version. Initially I had reverted those conflict of interest changes, but then self-reverted my edit because I wanted another editor to review it. Can you check this out? Cirt ( talk) 21:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
FYI, the sock of Thpcomm ( talk · contribs), Crystal08 ( talk · contribs), has gone and posted a thread at WP:COIN - here. I still think it would be best for this individual with a financial conflict of interest in this article to post suggested WP:RS/ WP:V secondary sources to the article's talk page, instead of editing the article directly. You had previously warned this user about editing the article directly, at User talk:Thpcomm. Cirt ( talk) 18:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I just made a reference box for myself. It works identically to a shoutbox. I was wondering if you'd like one, provided the admins allow you to have it. It's pretty convenient. -- Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 18:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This back and forth seems a bit much. I put in a report at AIV, but I'm not sure they'll take it, given that it's in userspace (and not typical blatant vandalism). Any ideas? -- Bfigura ( talk) 04:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
←Oh, IRC. Where would we be without your expediency? :) -- Bfigura ( talk) 04:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
May I ask you to reconsider and elaborate your suggeston of speedy deletion in the above discussion? At the current state, the article is in my opinion very well-cited and NPOV, and in no way constitutes WP:SOAP (as the nomination says and which you apparently agreed with). Moreover, WP:SOAP has never been criteria for speedy deletions. Herunar ( talk) 09:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:44, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Yes, you may post on WP:RFPP, per concurrence of admins on IRC. Alternately, you can just ask me to protect the page in question. — Kurykh 02:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh man, I'm really sorry about that. I was trying to get a better picture, but I screwed up. I'm really sorry. Chris wikiguru ( talk) 06:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this edit, there's nothing that says an article can't be speedy tagged while also at AfD. If something turns out to meet a speedy criterion, then it would only make sense to tag it, even if it's already at AfD too. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ( Broken clamshells• Otter chirps) 03:03, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Just so you know, User:Illadelph halflifeis a sock of User:TyrusThomas4lyf, who is a long time abuser. Chris! c t 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Seems the sock reported you at WP:AIV, figured I let you know. Not sure why he would do that. Momusufan ( talk) 04:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Since it appears Shuanggen has not listened to you, I have nominated his userpage for MfD here. - Jéské ( v^_^v :L14 Grarrl Barbarian) 05:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey BoL,
Thanks for all your hard work trying to help out User:Shuanggen Jin. I just noticed your revert of their talk page blanking and wanted to stop by to let you know that blanking your own talk page is generally allowed under WP:TALK#User talk pages. Naturally, it does tend to make it a little bit harder to tell what warnings a user has received, but in every discussion I've seen about it on ANI, the general consensus has been that it's allowed.
Anyways, just thought I'd stop by and let you know. Thanks, and keep up the hard work! -- jonny- m t 04:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for alerting me of the ANI post! Bestchai ( talk) 23:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
There's no need to be taunting users like you did on his talk page. If it's a vandal, don't sink to their level. Metros ( talk) 04:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
You said in my talk page that wikipedia is not a free web host. I know that. Where have you found an advertisement for my userpage??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GTA Ganxtaize ( talk • contribs) 01:36, 14 March 2008
I'm sorry about treating Wikipedia as a social network. I didn't know that showing her a link elsewhere on here was talking. I won't do that again. Thanks for telling me too.-- Lover of Itachi ( talk) 15:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand what you added on my talk. What is the mainspace? The whole of wikipedia? I just don't understand. If you mean I havn't edited any pages. It's because on my home computer Wiki doesn't work. I only get on Wikipedia at school. Therefore, I have no time to edit anything at school unless I want to fail. So forgive me as of now I will start editing things once my main computer at home works. -- Lover of Itachi ( talk) 17:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi BoL:
Thanks for your offer of a third opinion at Talk:Muhammad. I think further input would be helpful. I added a more detailed note at Talk:Muhammad.
It is a bit confusing because the discussion is at Talk:Muhammad; the wording under discussion is at Talk:Muhammad/FAQ. Wanderer57 ( talk) 12:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi BoL: I appreciate your effort to clue me in about 3O procedure ("If this is your first time doing a 3O, the case will be on the IRC channel (Link). If you wish, the mediation may commence on 03:00 (UTC). ")
Unfortunately, I am not able to understand this information because 1) I've never used IRC and don't know how to, and 2} I was under the impression (from very very limited experience) that 3O opinions were given through comments in the normal Wikipedia Talk pages.
Wanderer57 ( talk) 02:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
3rd opinion is not supposed to be mediation. Its exactly what it sounds like, an extra outside opinion to try to bring in fresh views. There is no "case" and certainly no need for an IRC channel (even actual mediation can be done on talk pages). Mr. Z-man 02:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Are you saying that all it needs is some references? Kitty53 ( talk) 04:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 16:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 22:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 22:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
When posting reports on WP:UAA, please use {{ user-uaa}}, not {{ userlinks}}. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Is there any way to get that account renamed? I don't want anyone associating me with that account. (It's not mine, fwiw). Keilana| Parlez ici 15:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the {{ prod}} tag from Arthur C. Trumbo, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, it is best not to propose deletion of articles that have previously been de-{{ prod}}ed, even by the article creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{ prod}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Redfarmer ( talk) 02:41, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Per Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Removing_topic_ban_on_Blow_of_Light_-_Finalise.3F I have unprotected your userpage. I would like to remind you that even though the ban has been lifted, other editors will still probably watch your edits and be less forgiving should you violate a policy. Otherwise, welcome back and happy editing. MBisanz talk 08:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
With regard to your comments on User:Lookinhere: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Look, you and Lookinhere really need to get over your personal problems and stop attacking each other, stop, please. -- Atyndall93 ( talk | contribs) 04:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 06:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 07:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy Bunny to you too! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Travellingcari ( talk • contribs) 05:06, 23 March 2008
This is about your recent reversion of Springfield High School (Tennessee) to an earlier version by Ivyleaguetds. However, the version you reverted from was from the same author, and seemed to be a legitimate edit. There were a few empty categories, but I assume that the author was simply waiting and taking the page editing step-by-step, perhaps unaware of the 3-edit rule. So I'm reverting the artice back to the author's newest, which includes info about the school's organization and possible future info on other things. Rohan ( talk) 04:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
I put in the Admin request for protection. That guy isn't just removing the tags, he's adding blanket POV and made up info without references. I think you should leave the content as-is per my last revisions until he can actually come up with real sources, or this article will never be referenced whatsoever. I've been painstakingly referencing three or four other big articles recently, he can do the same. Some of that info is speculative at best. 74.228.158.68 ( talk) 04:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 20:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
You had previously reverted conflict of interest edits by (now indef-blocked) Thpcomm ( talk · contribs). An acknowledged sockpuppet of that user, Crystal08 ( talk · contribs), has appeared and reverted back to the conflict of interest version. Initially I had reverted those conflict of interest changes, but then self-reverted my edit because I wanted another editor to review it. Can you check this out? Cirt ( talk) 21:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
FYI, the sock of Thpcomm ( talk · contribs), Crystal08 ( talk · contribs), has gone and posted a thread at WP:COIN - here. I still think it would be best for this individual with a financial conflict of interest in this article to post suggested WP:RS/ WP:V secondary sources to the article's talk page, instead of editing the article directly. You had previously warned this user about editing the article directly, at User talk:Thpcomm. Cirt ( talk) 18:33, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
I just made a reference box for myself. It works identically to a shoutbox. I was wondering if you'd like one, provided the admins allow you to have it. It's pretty convenient. -- Gp75motorsports REV LIMITER 18:40, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
This back and forth seems a bit much. I put in a report at AIV, but I'm not sure they'll take it, given that it's in userspace (and not typical blatant vandalism). Any ideas? -- Bfigura ( talk) 04:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
←Oh, IRC. Where would we be without your expediency? :) -- Bfigura ( talk) 04:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
May I ask you to reconsider and elaborate your suggeston of speedy deletion in the above discussion? At the current state, the article is in my opinion very well-cited and NPOV, and in no way constitutes WP:SOAP (as the nomination says and which you apparently agreed with). Moreover, WP:SOAP has never been criteria for speedy deletions. Herunar ( talk) 09:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot ( talk) 15:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)