Dear Bibliomaniac15/Archive 15,
I just wanted to wish you and your family a happy new year, however you're celebrating it. Whether 2009 was a good year for you, or if it wasn't the greatest year, hopefully 2010 will be better. Cheers, and happy editing in 2010.

December21st2012Freak ^{Happy New Year!} at ≈ 00:15, 1 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello Teacher! I wanted to stop by and wish you a wonderful and glorious New Year. May this year bring new adventures and excitements that will thrill you! Thanks for all you do here on Wikipedia! Canyouhearmenow 13:48, 1 January 2010 (UTC) reply

A bureaucrat discussion has been opened in order to determine the consensus in this request for adminship. Please come participate. ··· 日本穣 ^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bibliomaniac15/Archive 15! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards. If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 18:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Your input would be appreciated at

• Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#How many official Dictators to time of Roman Empire
• Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities#"lex Junia Licinia"

Thanks.-- Doug Coldwell ^talk 20:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, relax :)

Sorry to make you worry about my name.

I'm not a vandal and i dont screw things up.

Happy New Year!

-- 冷凍貓屍 ( talk) 12:15, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply

If I were to run for adminship, would you support or oppose me, and why? — MC10 ( T• C• GB• L• EM) 02:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Well, to say the least I was looking at user pages that were edited by users other than their owners, and I ran across this. I'm pretty clueless as to what should be done. It has been edited a lot, the person who moved it said the writer 'rudely requested userfication' and the article is just slanderous at this point. However, I don't think it qualifies for deletion and hte original author hasn't edited it in ages. I've filed a request for assistance at Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests#User:JRG/Corey_Worthington Best Regards, NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs 18:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello Bibliomaniac15, I was wondering if you would be available to help contribute to a peer review on Tomb Raider? I'd like to try and improve the article as much as I can. I managed to improve the article and promote it to B-class yesterday, but to improve it further, I would like an in-depth review. More details are available here. Thank you for your time! Phynicen ^"Chat" 14:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, I noticed your name on the list of mentors for new GA reviewers. This is my first review and I was wondering if you could look it over. Thank you. PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 02:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your quick response. One quick question: Is it acceptable for the reviewer to fix things in the article? For instance, some of the grammatical things I could have just as easily fixed, and I noticed you editing some small things. Only I didn't see anything in any of the instructions about good article reviews that said whether or not you could. Once again, thanks for your review and help! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 03:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

I'm not sure if you should or not, but you told me to remind you, so I shall. Best Regards, NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs 02:41, 23 January 2010 (UTC) reply

I fucking hate that word. ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 03:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC) reply

LOL. bibliomaniac 1 5 03:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi biblio, I'd appreciate if you could have a look at Plateosaurus. The content is, I am sure, already at FAC level, but thre grammar..... the style..... Any comments are welcome (as long as you are polite, which I just know you will be). TIA! HMallison ( talk) 16:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. I've submitted Club Penguin for a peer review. I hope you can comment on the article (any comments are welcome). Click here to see the review and comment on the article. Thank you. -- Ha dg er 00:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC) reply

The Wikipedia:Trading card game project needs your help in choosing the rules, which is essential for developing everything else of the game. Please consider !voting for a set of rules here. You may voice your opinion about a particular set here. Also, if you have a new idea on what the rules could be, you are encouraged to propose a new set of rules (instructions can be found at the !voting page). Thank you, ♠ TomasBat 02:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Note: You are receiving this message because you signed your name at the project's list of members.

Thanks for protecting Template:Vandalism information. I was actually thinking about requesting it, but couldn't think of a good policy-based reason under which to do it. I'm glad I'm not the only one that felt that way! Thanks, Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 16:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey bibliomaniac. Just checking in for admin coaching, and notifying you about Wikipedia:Community_de-adminship/RfC I figure you knew, but if you didn't it's fairly important. I have yet to decide how to vote. Secondly I have written two more articles: Mo Tae-Bum and LG Mobile World Cup, the second which I nominated for GA and is on hold. Plus a featured picture File:Balaklava sick 2.jpg Enough with the bragsheet, I just wanted to remind you about the admin coaching. If you don't have enough time, the whole process isn't pressing, so feel free to hold off until you do. NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs 03:30, 23 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey there Biblio. You may be interested to know that I nominated USAD to appear on the main page on April 25, the day of this year's National Competition awards banquet. I'd appreciate it if you could leave your comments here. Thanks, NW ( Talk) 18:08, 18 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, I see that you are listed as an active coach.

This is just a reminder to ask that you keep the entry at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status up to date - if you take on a new student, or a student stops being coached, could you update your entry?

Please accept my apologies if you have been doing this - I'm sending this to everyone on the current active list, and not trying to track down what coaching is being done!

If you are no longer willing to coach, please remember to move your name to the "Former coaches" section!

Keeping the list up to date means that any potential coachees can clearly see what the current state of play is!

Thank you for your attention... and now, I'm off back to what I was doing before!

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 08:06, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April.

– MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:19, 25 March 2010 (UTC) reply

I was wondering if u believe i should recieve rollback rights. I dish out warnings left and right towords vandals. I believe rollback rights would help me and everyone in the fight against vandals. If u beleive i should recieve them plz give them lol thank u 4 ur time.-- STATicVerseatide 01:10, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

thanks 4 the tips that. warning ugh i just got pissed off at this guy cause he wouldn't listen and im already a new pages patroler might as well potrol recent changes lol-- STATicVerseatide 01:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Do u believe i should recieve the rollback rights. I have done quite a bit of vandalism controling incuding giving out warnings and reporting a couple vandals that got blocked. STATicVerseatide feedback what i've done 01:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, I was wondering if you would grant autoreviewer requests. I want to request autoreviewer because I have 2300+ edits and have been editing here for many months. I am also a patroller (including the autopatroller) at Commons. Thank you. — Terrence and Phillip 13:53, 30 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you again, — Terrence and Phillip 05:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC) reply

You just deleted an image that I originally owned but put it into the public domain. I have restored it. Rhodydog ( talk) 14:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Above Issue resolved, thanks! 15:48, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to let you know (since you inquired about the image I posted) that I have caved into editor Woogee's requests and references to EasyGraph ( See last remnants here) have been completely deleted. I'm not entirely happy with this but I don't have too much time to peruse the matter further. I'm trying one last attempt to satisfy his requirements and that is to send him signed letters from academia (i.e tenured faculty) supporting the uniqueness of the software. He is a demanding editor. Rhodydog ( talk) 15:46, 30 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bibliomaniac15. You have new messages at L'Aquatique's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi there, you were the most recent entry in the deletion log for this page, so I'm also guessing you salted it (back in 2008). Would you mind unsalting it? I'd like to write an article there and I have some references. <>Multi‑Xfer<> ( talk) 06:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Ok thank you. It looked like your name was the last one in the block log so I just assumed. <>Multi‑Xfer<> ( talk) 03:41, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, I've e-mailed you a source request. Thanks, Mm40 ( talk) 15:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, Could you please look at this: [1]. Thank you. Regards, Wikimk -- 77.29.84.11 ( talk) 16:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanx. -- Wikimk ( talk) 18:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Just reminding you that if you have the time (it isn't urgent or a big deal) to update the admincoaching page. Regards, NativeForeigner ^Talk/ _Contribs/ ^Vote! 04:36, 13 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm mono, a prospective admin who would like some guidance for the future. I'm prepared to answer more of (your) questions later, however, I just wanted to put it past you. I appreciate your time, whether you decide to coach me or not, and look forward to your response. mono 01:10, 20 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi there, Bibliomaniac15! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By – pjoef ( talk • contribs) 09:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello, Bibliomaniac. I have an interesting situation that I would like an admin opinion about. I have several talk page stalkers and we generally have ongoing discussions on my talk page about various things, mostly WP related. While our discussions are chatty on occasion, we all work too. User:Lawlar (with whom I have had no interaction) came by and deleted an entire discussion that he deemed myspacing. He did this to User:Mono also. Mono is a new addition to my tps's and has engaged in behavior I deem immature, but I do not believe that Lawlar's mass deletion was warranted. Lawlar also left a warning for Mono which I think sounds very knowledgeable for a new user. All of his edits are from today. Please tell me what you think. Thank you, PrincessofLlyr ^{royal court} 13:56, 17 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Ride Quiz, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Ride Quiz and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Disney/Ride Quiz during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 23:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I've nominated Role-playing video game for peer review. At your leisure we would appreciate your feedback... even just a brief comment will help... (The peer review page is here. Shooterwalker ( talk) 04:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks so much for protecting the Guitar Hero: Warriors of Rock page. It got REALLY out of hand with vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GrantyO ( talk • contribs) 15:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Bibliomaniac15 - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.

I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.

Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.

Thank you!  7  23:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Bibliomaniac15

Hello! I am an old 70yo gent in California who would like to contribute/edit the Wikipedia listing for my rural hometown in Eastern Pennsylvania. The listing has a History section and under that section, I'd like to add a few historical community events that occurred in my childhood there in the '50's.

I've looked on the Web but could not find any verification of these events, the Northampton County Fair (circa '50's) and the Northampton Jack Frost Parade (also circa '50's), as well as the long-time weekly-held Public Bingo Games at the Lappawinzo Rod & Gun Club & Fairgrounds(where the Northampton County Fair was held), which had buses of Bingo-players arriving every Friday evening from states and towns all over the East Coast (a major event).

These events were probably reported in newspaper articles of the day in the Allentown (PA) Morning Call newspaper, but the Morning Call's archives only start in 1984. Perhaps '50's copies of such articles might be found on microfiche, but my local library here in California only has local California newspaper microfiches.

I know intimately about these events and can provide much detail, as my Father was the Creator/Director of these events, but anything that I wrote would be unconfirmed/unverifiable. Somehow I need to obtain reliable confirmation sources for my edit. (I've contacted local Northampton administrative people but no one can offer any info about such '50's events.) Unless it might be permissible to just edit the existing article content and also provide a Notice that Requests any Knowledgeable Person to provide confirming substantiation of said edit facts. Is that possible?

What should I do? Again, the article is 'Northampton, Pennsylvania'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56PackardExec ( talk • contribs) 23:36, 13 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your reply. I've already accordingly edited the historical section of the Northampton page. I trust such is acceptable. '56PackardExec —Preceding unsigned comment added by 56PackardExec ( talk • contribs) 19:06, 2 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello old friend! I wanted to get your opinion on something. I removed an edit to the Lucille Ball article [2] because it was a piece of memorabilia with her signature on it. I felt that it had no relevance to the article and it certainly was never mentioned within the body of the same. I felt that should a spot be written about how she adored her fans or how she sent messages to them it would be appropriate for inclusion. I was just wondering how you felt about this and if I in fact did the right thing by removing it from the page. I just don't want the article to turn into a museum of artifacts or a depository for memorabilia. If it is relevant to the article I would not have a problem. Can you give me your opinion? Also, if you look on the talk page [3] you will see I did give the other editor an option that we could both work towards. Canyouhearmenow 13:09, 17 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Sorry to disturb you, but can you block 114.57.231.167 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). The address is being used by the Indonesian misinformation vandal who constantly inserts misinformation into Digimon and other articles without a source. His current MO is to connect Little League with several affiliate Televisa stations. Please ASAP. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Never mind. IP has already blocked. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I am requesting assistance on the Rachel Lloyd article. On July 8 and 9, User:MeditationSpace has blanked sourced information and various portions of the article, reverted edits, and removed all references. I became involved with the article through the Workproject:Wikify. The article had been tagged as lacking references and in need of wikification. I also discovered that the article was written much like promotional material or a resume. Rather than PROD, I began the process of researching the subject, adding content, and references to make it an appropriate biography. Others also assisted with constructive edits as well. Then yesterday, the edits/vandalism showed up.

It appears that the user has a conflict of interest as a colleague and coworker of the subject of the article. User has inserted an additional name within the article as a colleague through film production. I am familiar with the film and structure of this organization. The name added to the article is a lecturer and advocate of meditation. Changes and edits made indicate a conflict of interest, lack of neutrality, and censorship. User appears concerned about the sensitive content in the article as indicated in the edit summary of July 8, 2010. The latest edit did not include a summary, but I assume it was made for the same reasons.

1. (cur | prev) 22:23, July 8, 2010 MeditationSpace (talk | contribs) (5,239 bytes) (cut out content inappropriate for a biography of a living person including date and place of birth, insensitive inclusion of information about rapes, beatings etc and childhood exp, inappropriate tone) (undo) (Tag: blanking)

I'm assuming good faith and a simple lack of understanding on the part of the User. While on the surface, inclusions of this nature would not be appropriate for BLP. However, the subject is the founder of a national human trafficking organization, with a background speaking before national and international organizations sharing her story. These organizations include the United Nations, major colleges and universities, national news media, and the U.S. Congress, Senate, and HHS Committee on Human Trafficking. She has received international honors and awards for her social advocacy, based on her personal background and "war story." The information in the article was sourced, although the article was not complete. It still presents as promotional material or a resume. However, now lacking all references. I hope this is enough explanation. Your help and any advice you may have is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Cindamuse ( talk) 00:31, 10 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the response, but how do you suggest this be resolved? This user has now vandalized this page twice. The page was going through a major revision and she just arbitrarily censored the article. Not to mention COI and NPOV. There may have been a bit more information on the subject's early life, however, this is understandable as a work in progress. There was more to be added. But now, what's the point if User:MeditationSpace is going to continue to arbitrarily censor at will? Is there no recourse to return it to a working copy, including copy and sources? She was instructed not to blank sourced pages and to work toward consensus on the talk page to no avail. Can these changes be reverted? Cindamuse ( talk) 02:56, 10 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi, thanks for restoring my mop. Slightly complex question/review: Adivasi_yuva_shakti

Repeatedly created page by the same user ( User:Adiyuva), deleted multiple times for various CSD reasons (the latest including copyvios from at least one website). Appears to be a foreign charity organization of some kind, so it could be notable, but certainly not with the repeatedly deleted creations. I really don't like full page protections, but in this case I SALTed it for a few months asking feedback from the user. I didn't block the user as he appears to be a somewhat new/confused editor with some... attempts at constructive edits.

Appropriate actions? I know usually people SALT pages indefinately (and years ago I did as well) but in this case most edits were within a couple of weeks or so, so I only did it for a few months.

I read, and reread the protection, CSD, deletion etc. policy and such countless times; hopefully I didn't miss anything.

RN 22:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply

It encompassed a lot of policies; thank you very much for reviewing that. RN 00:26, 15 July 2010 (UTC) reply