|
||
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted your recent edit to The Dentist. The IMDb is a not reliable source, and its contents should not be imported into Wikipedia. It's written by random people, who sometimes make up hoaxes when they're bored, much like Wikipedia. For this reason, we require citations to be to sources that are not user-generated. Usually, this means articles written by professional journalists or academics in a source that has editorial control – for example, Variety or the Los Angeles Times, which often cover American films. Second, per MOS:FILM#Audience response, we don't user reviews. They are subject to vote stacking and brigading. Instead, we use professional services, such as CinemaScore or PostTrak. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- it says on wiki that user reviews are acceptable as long as they are identified as user reviews Bgrus22 ( talk) 10:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
|
In recognition of high-quality editing on current events often extremely politically-charged and difficult to manage by all but the greatest editors. Fvoltes ( talk) 01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @ Doug Weller: hope youre doing well, long time no see! thanks for letting me know right now I am working on a few pages ranging from a footballer to Italian politicians. Hope thats all fine a' okay. Bgrus22 ( talk) 01:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Bgrus22. Thank you for your work on Hava Inbar. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ SunDawn: Thank you for taking the time to write this message, it is very much appreciated. I didn't realize there were other G-d fearing folks here editing on the site. I hope you stay well and safe in these trying times! Feel free to send me a message if you ever need a hand with something or to get any pages started. Oh and your page is amazing, I may be stealing some tags you have that I didn't know about :) . Bgrus22 ( talk) 17:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
|
||
Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted your recent edit to The Dentist. The IMDb is a not reliable source, and its contents should not be imported into Wikipedia. It's written by random people, who sometimes make up hoaxes when they're bored, much like Wikipedia. For this reason, we require citations to be to sources that are not user-generated. Usually, this means articles written by professional journalists or academics in a source that has editorial control – for example, Variety or the Los Angeles Times, which often cover American films. Second, per MOS:FILM#Audience response, we don't user reviews. They are subject to vote stacking and brigading. Instead, we use professional services, such as CinemaScore or PostTrak. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 08:27, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
- it says on wiki that user reviews are acceptable as long as they are identified as user reviews Bgrus22 ( talk) 10:20, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
|
|
In recognition of high-quality editing on current events often extremely politically-charged and difficult to manage by all but the greatest editors. Fvoltes ( talk) 01:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC) |
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:17, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
- @ Doug Weller: hope youre doing well, long time no see! thanks for letting me know right now I am working on a few pages ranging from a footballer to Italian politicians. Hope thats all fine a' okay. Bgrus22 ( talk) 01:19, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Bgrus22. Thank you for your work on Hava Inbar. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @ SunDawn: Thank you for taking the time to write this message, it is very much appreciated. I didn't realize there were other G-d fearing folks here editing on the site. I hope you stay well and safe in these trying times! Feel free to send me a message if you ever need a hand with something or to get any pages started. Oh and your page is amazing, I may be stealing some tags you have that I didn't know about :) . Bgrus22 ( talk) 17:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)