Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Perfect (Ed Sheeran song). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ss 112 13:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Can you please help me have access on Beyoncé award page? I have list of reliable award for Beyoncé. Thank you Beyhiveboys ( talk) 01:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sweet Dreams, Sorry, Formation, Capital FM, Naughty Girl and Listen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 14:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Awards of Angel Locsin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 13:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by CodeLyoko were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This info already exsits on Angel Locsin , an extra article is not needed.

CodeLyoko ^buzz 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello, Beyhiveboys! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CodeLyoko buzz 15:34, 28 August 2019 (UTC) reply

CodeLyoko You deleted the information I put on Angel Locsin page, you don't approve the page I created. I already put links and I am halfway done, I hope the article will be publish any moment soon. If you are questioning links, you should look into page of Toni Gonzaga and Marian Rivera who don't have enough links but until today was still published. I hope you understand my point and expect for the article to be publish. Thank you CASSIOPEIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beyhiveboys ( talk • contribs)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angel Locsin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The General's Daughter ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver).

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC) reply

The draft you created has been reviewed an rejected. Don't remove AfC banners from it. You have not discussed your changes on the person's article, nor have you addressed the AfC concerns. Do not make controversial changes like this before discussing them first. Once you have gathered consensus to make the changes, only then should you make a new article and do major content reformatting. Do not simply do your changes again as this is considered disruptive editing. —   HELLKNOWZ   ▎ TALK 13:18, 12 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

thanks for the edits but i think it would be better if you go List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé edits than britney because beyonce has more fake awards. THANKS!

Thanks for your continuous additions to this page. Please ensure that when you add a new award and/or section, that the reference has it's own column rather than simply including it beside the result of the award. Also, in the summary of the award, please ensure it simply states the amount of nominations and wins, if any, Beyoncé has received to provide cohesiveness with the rest of the page. -- StatsFreak ( talk) 05:58, 3 December 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beyoncé listography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyoncé listography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ^{Talk to me} 01:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply

• Since you keep returning the listography into the List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé article, I'm going to ask for a third opinion as to whether the information which was deleted as list cruft is appropriate for a list of awards page. Would you agree to this method of resolution? Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ^{Talk to me} 16:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply

• I agree. To add, those listography are not counted as awards on her page, I just included that so people will know what are the other distinction she received since people here kept on deleting the Listography page I created Talk to me 16:39, 17 February 2020 (UTC) reply
  • It doesn't belong on an awards page. The "listography" was deleted because it contains information that doesn't belong in an encylopedia, so please don't continue to add it back in. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars ^{Talk to me} 18:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Hey! I've seen that Beyoncé has won many BMI Awards but they're not on her awards and nominations wiki article so thought I'd let you know if you want to add them ☺️ Bgkc4444 ( talk) 23:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)Bgkc4444 reply

She is not credited for the awards since she is member of ASCAP Bgkc4444 ( talk)

Oh I see thank you! Feel free to delete this :) Bgkc4444 ( talk) 10:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 00:26, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I am certain I add legit awards and you kept on deleting them all. Even the things I deleted on the awards and added to other honors , you also want them deleted. You want to delete fragrance awards that are legit and even the WACO Humanitarian Award that Beyonce attended and received her award. I am tired discussing matters with you, you kept on deleting awards as if you owned this site, they are not BLOG AWARDS, they are legit awards.

Read WP:Indiscriminate. This is not a place to add every award you find in the internet. It's for notable awards from notable organizations. Does the organization have a page on WP that proves its relevancy? no. Has it been covered by a major news outlet? both no. Then, irrelevant. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 02:00, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

I left a message on your talk page, let's discuss it there.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 02:31, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

You removed to many awards that really exists.

• Waco Theater Awards - https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/beyonc-black-panther-love-merge-at-wearable-art-gala-1095354
• Different fragrance awards that really exists such as CEW - https://www.cew.org/awards-honors/beauty-awards/
• Antville awards, they exists on many pages such as /info/en/?search=List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_MGMT

I don't know what you're real intentions but I noticed you did not edit page from Taylor or GaGa that has awards that "DON'T HAVE A PAGE HERE", let's not be bias and insecure dear.

List them. All Taylor Swift's awards are double checked and everything. It's literally a WP:FL. Stop readding non-notable awards.. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 03:29, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

You're definition of non-notable awards is subjective. I will always revert your edit because your including reliable awards and organizaitons such as BEFFTA and WACO. YOu're also deleting AFRIMMA and even CEW that is a big awards for perfume in UK.

It's not... Doesn't have an article..not covered by major media. It's that or another editor should intervene bc you're failing a guideline. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 03:38, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

... Sirius XM. The first filter is literally the organization having a WP article. Did you even read WP:Indiscriminate?? Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 03:43, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

All Lady Gaga's awards are also double-checked. It's also a WP:FL. Do you see that star in the upper right corner? That means it's been double checked, and therefore, they are all notable. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 03:46, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

AGAIN. BEFFTA is an African awards, its covered by african media but you're disregarding that. You added Sirius XM awards that does not have a page here, double standards bc your favorite artist won? Also, WACO doesn't covered by major media? what do you call Entertainment Weekly, Variety, Essence and Billboard that posted an article about Beyonce receiving an award there?

ALso, why can't you edit the awards of Michael Jackson, Mariah or Whitney? your definition of fake awards are really suitable with them.

Does BEFFTA have a page here? No. If you see non-notable awards, you remove them yourself. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 04:14, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 04:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

SO this awards are fake bc they don't have a page here but published by major publications

- https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/beyonc-black-panther-love-merge-at-wearable-art-gala-1095354 - https://www.thefader.com/2018/03/18/beyonce-accept-award-humanitarianism - https://www.eonline.com/shows/e_news/news/921692/beyonce-was-honored-with-the-humanitarian-award-at-the-2018-wearable-art-gala

Even, TRUMPET Awards was fake? - https://variety.com/2016/tv/news/bounce-tv-ed-gordon-newsmagazine-trumpet-awards-1201752532/

GIrl, you are double standars and it shouldn't be that way.

I never used the word fake. I said they are not notable per WP guidelines. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 04:28, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

THEY ARE EXISTING AWARDS BUT YOU KEPT ON DELETING IT. I AGREE ON VEVO AND BDS EVEN THOUGH THEY ARE REAL BUT THOSE AWARDS WITH VALID AWARDS AND PROPER MEDIA, I AM REALLY AGAINST IT, WHY ARE YOU KEPT ON DLEETING THEM. I READ THE ARTICLE YOU POSTED AND I IBSISTS THAT WACO, TRUMPET AND OTHER AWARDS MUST BE RETAIN ON THE PAGE.

Because those are not notable (don't have a WP page proving their notability). This is not an endless lists of awards... Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 04:47, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Beyhiveboys reported by User:Cornerstonepicker (Result: ). Thank you. Cornerstonepicker ( talk) 17:56, 25 March 2020 (UTC) reply

The audacity to report coming from the real obsessed fan. I kept showing references but they are ignored, most of the awards deleted are real awards and existing and most have real awards ceremony but they are deleted due to the reason "they don't have a page here" even though most have their own.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 17:19, 26 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• You resumed the edit war at List of awards and nominations received by Beyoncé right after your original block expired, so I have imposed an indefinite partial block on your account. You won't be able to edit that article any more. The noticeboard discussion is here. The block may be lifted once it is clear that the article war has stopped and all parties are going to follow consensus. EdJohnston ( talk) 14:22, 28 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam-2727 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I think the list in its current form exaggerates the amount of awards. Try to condense everything down to one table, and in the beginning of the article, write in a more neutral tone.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Awards received by Angel Locsin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Awards received by Angel Locsin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam-2727 ( talk) 02:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Good day Sam-2727, Can the awards on the format I created it? The format wherein all rows and columns are in one table kind of confused me.

Sam-Beyhiveboys ( talk) 02:41, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There seems to be little, if any, improvement following the previous declinature. The list seems endless and the reader might wonder about the notability of these awards. There are still WP:PEACOCK terms in the lead which must be reduced to maintain neutrality.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Awards received by Angel Locsin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Awards received by Angel Locsin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{ Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash ( talk) 22:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hello, Beyhiveboys. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " List of Awards received by Angel Locsin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:56, 30 September 2020 (UTC) reply

There's information at Wikipedia:Appealing a block, but you're unlikely to be unblocked from that article unless you convince administrators that you won't just start edit-warring there again. —valereee ( talk) 13:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC) reply

I won't be engage in an edit warring anymore, all I want is to continue what ive been doing for years, and that is to provide legit sources and verified awards. If you will observe, many awards in the wikipedia right now is fan made, which must be avoided. —Beyhiveboys ( talk) 13:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Bbb23 Hi, Can you please review the blocked gave to me year ago. Its been a year and the person who I got edit warring with was not even blocked even though he was the one who started it. I promise to stop edit warring and will just focus on the accuracy of the page. Thanks —Beyhiveboys ( talk) 13:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Angel Locsin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Maxim and PEP.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Though these two charts measure two different things, WP:RECORDCHARTS say to only use charts which are widely known and accepted in their country of origin as being an accurate depiction of success in that country. The RISA chart for South Africa is the one which is affiliated to the International Phonographic Industry so it is this one which should be used. We do not add multiple charts just because an artist may have scored better on another one. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 13:45, 23 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello Lil-unique1 if you check the link, the data I used came from RISA website. You can check it yourself. They have two charts, one for streaming and one for radio. I don't see any problem using those two since there is no combined charts from RISA. Beyhiveboys

See WP:RECORDCHARTS. Radiomonitor is not widely accepted as an accurate reflection of popularity in the country. There are also some issues with RM. See Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Radio_Monitor. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Dude I ain't going to tell you again. I don't care how many number ones Beyonce appears on Radio Monitor charts. They're not official and there's issues with them per Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Radio_Monitor. If you don't stop adding them, I will ask that you are topic banned from Beyonce articles. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 15:40, 31 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Not appropriate for use per WP:SINGLEVENDOR. >> Lil-unique1 ( talk) — 13:25, 1 September 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC) reply