Hello, Benjaminfreyart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GMG talk 12:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Benjaminfreyart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
-
Ancient Greek cuisine (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Macedonia
-
Millet (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Macedonia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Please note my recent corrections to Abraham Peyrenc de Moras. The word its is the possessive whereas the word it's is a contraction of it is. Just trying to eliminate future errors. Thanks for all you do for WP! -- LilHelpa ( talk) 13:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Benjaminfreyart,
Thanks for creating Abraham Peyrenc de Moras! I edit here too, under the username Hydronium Hydroxide and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thanks for the translation. Tagged for tone and citation style -- my guess is that both are a result of liberal use of de Lordat's bio for the original article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 10:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megalith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capstone ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrot cake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icing ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Dispute over the article chiropractic
Claims by McSly (for more details [ [1]]: "Your recent editing history at Chiropractic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly." McSly ( talk) 17:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
I published a fully referenced change to the lede on that page, with government websites as the source describing the profession as being “licensed” and two other editors are insisting that the references and word be removed. I will stop trying to improve this article since it is obvious that there are people radically beholden to their POV and rabidly against the article being neutral frey ( talk) 17:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello frey , it does not matter if you are right or wrong. If you continue to edit war, you will be block. I strongly advise you to revert your changes on the article and gain consensus for them first on talk page. I hope you understand that trying to impose your changes has zro chance of success without a consensus first. -- McSly ( talk) 17:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
As I said, I will not engage in the edit war, and will continue to post on the talk page in the hopes of gaining consensus there. However there are people who are apparently strongly against any reference to actual existing national licenses for the profession. I’m a painter not a doctor or scientist, and certainly not interested in people getting hurt by pseudomedicine. However, people censoring literal facts on Wikipedia offends me. I already submitted this dispute for resolution since I have no place being an arbiter of truth in these matters. If I were you I would consider carefully your position on those edits. The puppy dog is way out of line in his insistence on pushing the term pseudoscience up to the top of the lede frey ( talk) 17:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is my last reply here. As you can see, your changes were reverted again by an other editor. As I mentioned, the only way to have your changes implemented is to gain consensus on the talk page. Nothing else will work. By the way, the dispute resolution you opened has been closed since it requires extensive discussion first. -- McSly ( talk) 17:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Fragments of Energy (Theory) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Fragments of Energy (Theory), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ...
discospinster
talk 01:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Fragments of Energy
Hello, Benjaminfreyart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Fragments of Energy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 11:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monument, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venetian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello, Benjaminfreyart, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GMG talk 12:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Benjaminfreyart. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
-
Ancient Greek cuisine (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Macedonia
-
Millet (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Macedonia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Please note my recent corrections to Abraham Peyrenc de Moras. The word its is the possessive whereas the word it's is a contraction of it is. Just trying to eliminate future errors. Thanks for all you do for WP! -- LilHelpa ( talk) 13:28, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Benjaminfreyart,
Thanks for creating Abraham Peyrenc de Moras! I edit here too, under the username Hydronium Hydroxide and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Thanks for the translation. Tagged for tone and citation style -- my guess is that both are a result of liberal use of de Lordat's bio for the original article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hydronium Hydroxide}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
~ Hydronium~Hydroxide~ (Talk)~ 10:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Megalith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capstone ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 11:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carrot cake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Icing ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Dispute over the article chiropractic
Claims by McSly (for more details [ [1]]: "Your recent editing history at Chiropractic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly." McSly ( talk) 17:22, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
I published a fully referenced change to the lede on that page, with government websites as the source describing the profession as being “licensed” and two other editors are insisting that the references and word be removed. I will stop trying to improve this article since it is obvious that there are people radically beholden to their POV and rabidly against the article being neutral frey ( talk) 17:27, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello frey , it does not matter if you are right or wrong. If you continue to edit war, you will be block. I strongly advise you to revert your changes on the article and gain consensus for them first on talk page. I hope you understand that trying to impose your changes has zro chance of success without a consensus first. -- McSly ( talk) 17:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
As I said, I will not engage in the edit war, and will continue to post on the talk page in the hopes of gaining consensus there. However there are people who are apparently strongly against any reference to actual existing national licenses for the profession. I’m a painter not a doctor or scientist, and certainly not interested in people getting hurt by pseudomedicine. However, people censoring literal facts on Wikipedia offends me. I already submitted this dispute for resolution since I have no place being an arbiter of truth in these matters. If I were you I would consider carefully your position on those edits. The puppy dog is way out of line in his insistence on pushing the term pseudoscience up to the top of the lede frey ( talk) 17:37, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
- This is my last reply here. As you can see, your changes were reverted again by an other editor. As I mentioned, the only way to have your changes implemented is to gain consensus on the talk page. Nothing else will work. By the way, the dispute resolution you opened has been closed since it requires extensive discussion first. -- McSly ( talk) 17:53, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Fragments of Energy (Theory) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created,
Fragments of Energy (Theory), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ...
discospinster
talk 01:55, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Fragments of Energy
Hello, Benjaminfreyart. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Fragments of Energy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 11:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monument, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venetian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
|
| Hello! Voting in the
2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |