Your edits do not improve the quality of articles, while removing sourced info and breaking formatting. Please stop.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:17, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Wow, what a message! Which edits are you referring to? Beautiful War ( talk) 17:19, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

You do not yet have so many, at least not with this user account, no? The latest ones, population of Russian districts and localities.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:20, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I haven't made any edits that didn't improve the quality of articles, and I certainly haven't broken any formatting, so perhaps you could pick one specific edit you didn't like and explain why. As it is, I get the impression you simply didn't understand what I did. Beautiful War ( talk) 17:29, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sure you did break formatting, see e,g, here [1]. In any case, you need consensus for these edits.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I am not sure what you mean by "no reason given" [2] but in any case per WP:BLP you have to discuss before changing long-standing material. Please gain consensus for your edits first. In the meanwhile, I am reverting.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I haven't edited any biographies of living persons, so again it seems that you simply don't understand what I did. By "no reason given", I obviously mean you haven't given a reason for your revert. Do you think you have? Once again I request, identify a specific edit you don't like, and explain why. Beautiful War ( talk) 17:47, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

Sorry, WP:BRD. I gave you an example above. You have broken the formatting. Additionally, you removed sourced information from the article, all in one edit.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I do not know what you are objecting to. You do not seem to be able to make it clear. I did not break any formatting - if you believe otherwise, describe exactly what you think I did. I do not need to get any consensus for rewriting non-sentences as sentences; that consensus already exists. What makes you think articles should not be written grammatically? Beautiful War ( talk) 18:09, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

No, there is no consensus for that. Your edit has broken formatting, the reference is missing. If you are not able to see it, you should not be editing Wikipedia.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:12, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

So let me get this clear, you don't think there is a consensus to write articles in full grammatical sentences? And you think I broke some formatting but you won't explain what that was? Beautiful War ( talk) 18:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

I opened a topic about your behavior at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Beautiful War - reverts, disruptive editing, and IDHT, please comment there.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 18:23, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

What an absolutely incredible reaction to someone fixing grammatical errors. Beautiful War ( talk) 18:50, 7 September 2018 (UTC) reply

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Beautiful War ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

UTRS appeal #22595 was submitted on Sep 08, 2018 10:44:23. This review is now closed.

-- UTRSBot ( talk) 10:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC) reply