Hi Anonymous Bond! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry ( talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad, you may be blocked from editing. Do not change names of places and images in an article. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:08, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aurangabad. Stop being a vandal. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Why Anonymous Bond ( talk) 18:14, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Widr ( talk) 18:17, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous Bond ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Sir, I kept editing the changes. I did not see the notifications on my page. Please unblock me. I won’t do this again without access. Anonymous Bond (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 20:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is an editor who habitually marked up his/her edits as minor edits, when they were nothing of the kind. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:49, 21 January 2021 (UTC) reply

Your ability to edit this talk page has been restored, and UTRS appeal #84973 has been closed with advice to post an unblock request here. JBW ( talk) 22:16, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Anonymous Bond ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Hi, this is Anonymous Bond. I was blocked three years ago over some editing. I have waited three years to contribute to wikipedia. I really deserve to be unblocked since I have made many contributions to wikipedia and I am eager to contribute more. Thank you. Please consideer my request Anonymous Bond ( talk) 05:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Accept reason:

Per below. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Which guidelines did you violate? 331dot ( talk) 07:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I was blocked for disruptive editing. I was engaged in editing on a particular page and I did not see warnings on my page. And hence got blocked 3 years ago. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Specifically, what did you do wrong? In order to know if the behavior will not repeat, we need to know that you know what you did. 331dot ( talk) 12:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for giving your time for my request. I will explain this as honestly as I can. 3 years ago, a name of a city in my state/province was changed by the government. I was trying to contribute to Wikipedia by changing the name of the city from every paragraph of the page of city. Since, it was very fresh and recent many users did not know about the change. And my edits were reverted without me knowing that they were. I kept receiving warnings about the edits. However, i was editing on my smartphone and i did not see the messages. Thus, I kept on editing the name and I was blocked for the same reason. Now that was 3 years ago and I having been blocked still used wikipedia daily. I find Wikipedia helpful and spend a lot of time reading it. But I came across so many spelling mistakes and grammar. But i cannot do any edit. I regret about this. And i know i can contribute very much to Wikipedia as per my knowledge and experience. Please consider my request as I have faith in wikipedia. Thank you. Anonymous Bond (talk) 13:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC) Anonymous Bond ( talk) 13:05, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

What about your use of the minor edit checkbox? 331dot ( talk) 15:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes, I came to know about it when someone mentioned that minor edit is something which could be a typo or something like that. I thought changing or editing a whole paragraph or section was considered a major edit and what I did was considered minor edit. However, when i came to know about that, i did change my habit. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 16:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Any updates?

Please let me know.

331dot

Thank you. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 14:48, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please explain how WP:COMMONNAME applies to your edits to Aurangabad. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Certainly, it says common name is more preferred than official name. I wasn’t aware about this fact that’s why I kept editing the page Aurangabad without seeing notifications. This is the page I was blocked for disruptive editing. I understand my mistake and I regret making such mistakes OhNoitsJamie ^Talk Anonymous Bond ( talk) 15:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• I'm thinking that this might be worth a shot, but want to hear from what other admins think. 331dot ( talk) 19:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC) reply
  • No objects here if Widr doesn't object. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

    I have pleaded from my side as much as I can. It’s upto you to look forward to this matter.

    I do hope that you look positively into this issue.

    Thanking you.

    Best Regards. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 04:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  Any updates on this issue?

  please let me know.

  thank you.

  OhNoitsJamie

  331dot Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• If one of the watchers wants to unblock, they won't need permission from me. Widr ( talk) 06:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I have unblocked you; please note that any further disruption involving WP:COMMONNAME or misuse of the minor edit checkbox will result in your being blocked indefinitely again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you. I assure you it won’t happen😄 Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please don't add pointless bold tags to articles or talk pages. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 12:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I did that to make your name look awesome. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

First of all, we only list notable awards; additionally, words like "coveted" violate WP:NPOV, and list of things should be bulletted per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lists#Bulleted_lists. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Additionally, the photo you uploaded violates WP:COPYRIGHT; there is no evidence here that Pudhari news released the photo to the public domain. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for corrections. Seems like I cannot make any contributions to Wikipedia. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 16:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I personally know this person. How can I justify using his image? Anonymous Bond ( talk) 16:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Per Wikipedia:Image_use_policy, any image that you source from the web has to marked with a compatible license, such as a Creative_Commons_license. "Knowing" someone has no bearing on whether or not the image may be used on Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Please help me sir. I have created new image page. Please tell me if it is acceptable.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/67/Pratapsinh_Jadhav.jpeg Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Yogesh Pratapsinh Jadhav. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Youknowwhoistheman ( talk) 19:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the advice. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 04:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry, if anyone is offended. These pranks were made on April Fools’ Day. Happy April Fools’ Day everyone! Anonymous Bond ( talk) 11:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla ( talk) 11:37, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks sir for blocking me. As I understand humour has left Wikipedia.

Anyways, Happy April Fools! Anonymous Bond ( talk) 11:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Yamla has made use of administrative tools here incorrectly. It is explained that i have been blocked for disruptive editing. However, considering that i did not edit any wikipedia article page which can disrupt public use. This is a personal attack on me whilst using power of Wikipedia tools. {{ CheckUser block}

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Then you should make an unblock request. 331dot ( talk) 12:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You noted this is a checkuser block. It is not a checkuser block and I did not use my checkuser tools here. I'll also note you were unblocked just days ago after an extensive block for disruptive editing. You almost immediately returned to disruptive editing. I very strongly do not believe it is an abuse of admin tools to block you for disruptive editing when you were disruptively editing and have a history of disruptive editing (and other abuses). -- Yamla ( talk) 12:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Yamla Sir, I am very well aware of how I was blocked for disruptive editing. I apologised for that incident as I know the gravity of that mistake.

However, considering this block, I certainly think that this was unreasonable and wrong. You do know today is April Fools day and Wikipedia does accept humour for this day. But you sir blocked me for disruptive editing knowing that this was not disruption. You just took personal revenge on me for editing your talk page using Wikipedia’s tools. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Certainly sir, i will make an unblock request however on 2nd April 2024. I edited users pages for this prank and i hold responsibility for it for one day. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 12:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

When you request is of course up to you. 331dot ( talk) 12:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

As the admin who gave you a second chance and unblocked you less than a week ago, I'd strongly recommend against anyone unblocking you again given that all of your edits have either been disruptive or have demonstrated a complete lack of competence. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ohnoitsjamie I know sir. But today is April fools day. And i made these edits with good intention. I certainly think we can use some humour today. And blocking me for disrupting editing on April Fools day would be wrong.

However, do think how you look on this issue. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 13:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Do not ping me again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please note that a person playing a prank after midday is considered the "April fool" themselves. Theroadislong ( talk) 14:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Depends on where you live 😊 Anonymous Bond ( talk) 14:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

• Oppose any unblock. Even though there will inevitably be such an unblock (it happens), it shouldn't happen for a year, minimum. None of us need this sort of disruptive vandalism and to see it take place so soon after escaping a previous indef! That's an editor who is WP:NOTHERE in a big way. Andy Dingley ( talk) 22:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous Bond ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, This is @ anonymous bond. Requesting for unblock. I was blocked for editing users’ pages today on 1^st April 2024. This edits were made by me as a humour on April Fools’ day. This day is over and I request to unblock me.

Thanking you.

Regards, Annonymous Bond.

Anonymous Bond (
talk) 13:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
reply

Decline reason:

Far from abusing his tools, Yamla absolutely used them properly to stop your disruptive behavior that went beyond a simple joke. 331dot ( talk) 15:31, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@ Anonymous Bond: next time you watch the film You Only Live Twice, watch out for "the price of failure". Then you will know how your "joke" made your victims feel.-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Toddy1: I am a james bond fan, however i have watched pierce brosnan and daniel craig movies. But will watch this one when i can. Anonymous Bond ( talk)14:10, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Do not ping for "Admin help" when you already have an open unblock request. You are very close to losing your talk page access as well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:53, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This is simply unacceptable. Even Wikipedia promotes humour on April Fools’ day. Tell me one thing that i did today which was dangerous and harmful for Wikipedia. Editing users pages (that can be reversable) for prank which is justifiable on April Fools day does not certainly make my actions as wrong doing. I certainly see this as an ego problem. Abusing power and using it for personal vindictive simply makes this platform more dangerous because of administrators’s power abuse. It’s like a political leader justifying corruption. Please be fair and re review this request. Anonymous Bond ( talk) Anonymous Bond ( talk) 16:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please place new comments at the bottom. I stand by my review. Your edits went beyond a mere prank. All people see is text on a screen, they cannot see you or read your mind to know you are joking. You likely scared people. Saying this is about ego is dead wrong and if you persist with that line of argument you will likely find your talk page access removed. 331dot ( talk) 17:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I would certainly like to make a clean argument. But consider this day and consider my actions. Do you think admins can be blocked over talk page? And do you think my actions were irreversible? Are you even giving your fair opinion about it? I have read all rules regarding april fools and certainly I understand that I did not make any joke that was harmful to Wikipedia or any of its users.

I considerably think that this is unfair and biased. For the first time I was blocked, I knew it was my mistake and I apologised for making such mistake. For the second time, I do apologise for the pranks that i made, I even apologised for it on my talk page but I am not sorry for blocking me. I consider this unfair and I will fight for it. You have to argue with me explaining everything with detail. Blocking my talk page will only show the power abuse admins do over its users.

Please consider fair rules.

Regards,

Anonymous Bond Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Can I give you a tip for your own good - take a break - try to watch all the Bond films you have missed. The other day there was an editor who got a two-week block; he/she handled his/her unblock request so badly that it was turned into an indefinite block. (P.S. I assumed that you were still interested in the answer to your copyright question and answered it.)-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes, I would take a break, certainly. But I demand answers. Every action by administrators should be justified. And it should be justified in such a way that it must be appropriate and reasonable.

I would very much likely raise this issue to administrative action review or any other committee. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 04:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You do not want to bring this anywhere else- it won't go the way you are hoping it will go. See WP:BOOMERANG. 331dot ( talk) 16:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes it would go that way. You certainly might want to think what actions you make here Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anonymous Bond ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I am writing to ask for re review of this action. I was blocked on april fools day. Please unblock me. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 11:40 am, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I find your cries of "bias" offensive. And your cries of vindictiveness and abuse of power. There is no bias or vindictiveness or abuse of power in reblocking a disruptive editor who three days after being unblocked posted block notices on other users. That you do not see how awful doing that was argues against you having the sort of common sense needed to edit this encyclopedia. We do understand the situation. You resumed disruption three days after being unblocked. You think that placing block notices on user talk pages is not disruptive, and does not count because this disruption did not occur in article space and was done on April 1st. Let me assure you that you are wrong. You accuse others of lacking a sense of humor. Placing block notices is not funny. It is seriously indistinguishable from vandalism. That you continuously defend your disruptive editing, once again, argues against you having the sort of common sense needed to edit this encyclopedia.. If you continue arguing in this vein at UTRS, let me further assure you that you will wind up being banned from UTRS. Please do not request unblocking until you understand the serious nature of the disruption that resulted in you being reblocked. And please read and understand the WP:GAB. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 16:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You need to read Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks. The one thing that is clear from your unblock request is that either (a) you have never read it, or (b) you cannot understand it, or (c) you do not think that rules apply to you. I suspect (a).-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

By the way, it is difficult to understand your complaint. I think you are saying that these edits were a hilarious joke: User:Fylindfotberserk, User:Yamla, User:Toddy1, User:Cordless Larry, User:Girth Summit. So why are you complaining about Yamla making this edit? On 24 March, you asked to be unblocked so that you could make constructive edits, would it have been better if Yamla had told you that "this organisation does not tolerate failure"? I wonder if Number Eleven thought that that was a hilarious joke?-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yamla making this was not an edit, but it was clearly an action. We users are not sitting ducks here. And considering that it was 1^st April also known as April Fools Day which I already mentioned on my talk page and also apologised for that, blocking for an indefinite amount of time without considering any April Fools day is simply unjustified and inappropriate. Considering it was April Fools prank, you should have asked me the question whether I would have continued making these pranks after 1st April also.

READ WHAT I AM SAYING. Do not make unfair and biased judgments against users. Try to understand the situation first. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You also might want to explain to me that all my april fools day edit were done to editors pages and not actual Wikipedia pages. How do you justify this?

Also, never did I try to edit twice the same page. I only did one user page once. How do you define this edit as disruptive and recurring? Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Also, might I ought to suggest, please give valid points while answering the questions. Because someone up above may be watching this and might be reviewing this. Also, might see what actions are taken and were they appropriate. Anonymous Bond ( talk) 17:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please can someone revoke talk page access after reviewing the latest unblock request.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure if this is a case of WP:CIR or trolling, but in either case, we've wasted enough time here. Talk page access removed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply