Can I suggest you go and re-read the G4 criteria at WP:CSD#G4. This states that the criteria "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies" and the inclusion of new sources means this page meets both of these criteria and so is not eligible for G4 deletion. I also suggest you read the relevant part of our deletion policy, which states "Either a page fits the speedy deletion criteria or it does not. If there is a dispute over whether a page meets the criteria, the issue is typically taken to deletion discussions." As there's disagreement AfD is the way to go. Dpmuk ( talk) 18:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- It was deleted before. The "new sources" are nothing but FW links. Ergo, G4 applies. Andrewowen2000 ( talk) 18:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- As I state above that's not the only reason for my removal - the fact is there'd disagreement and our deletion policy clearly states that when there's disagreement WP:AfD is the way to go. You should be aware of my ANI report about you. Dpmuk ( talk) 18:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Was that supposed to scare me? I did what you asked me to do, so why are you bothering me?
- We had an pseudo-edit conflict - I was typing my report to ANI at the same time you self-reverted and I was not aware of the reversion until after I had posted the report. No it was not meant to scare you. I thought the situation had gone beyond something I could deal with so I brought it up at an appropriate venue. Consensus there may well have been that you did nothing wrong but the thread, as happens to a disturbing number of AN/I threads, appears to have gone stale so we'll never know. Dpmuk ( talk) 17:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Can I suggest you go and re-read the G4 criteria at WP:CSD#G4. This states that the criteria "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies" and the inclusion of new sources means this page meets both of these criteria and so is not eligible for G4 deletion. I also suggest you read the relevant part of our deletion policy, which states "Either a page fits the speedy deletion criteria or it does not. If there is a dispute over whether a page meets the criteria, the issue is typically taken to deletion discussions." As there's disagreement AfD is the way to go. Dpmuk ( talk) 18:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- It was deleted before. The "new sources" are nothing but FW links. Ergo, G4 applies. Andrewowen2000 ( talk) 18:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- As I state above that's not the only reason for my removal - the fact is there'd disagreement and our deletion policy clearly states that when there's disagreement WP:AfD is the way to go. You should be aware of my ANI report about you. Dpmuk ( talk) 18:44, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
- Was that supposed to scare me? I did what you asked me to do, so why are you bothering me?
- We had an pseudo-edit conflict - I was typing my report to ANI at the same time you self-reverted and I was not aware of the reversion until after I had posted the report. No it was not meant to scare you. I thought the situation had gone beyond something I could deal with so I brought it up at an appropriate venue. Consensus there may well have been that you did nothing wrong but the thread, as happens to a disturbing number of AN/I threads, appears to have gone stale so we'll never know. Dpmuk ( talk) 17:08, 22 December 2010 (UTC)