From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks bro, but I manage alone...

Thanks guy!, but it wasn't necessary. I've been on Wikipedia for as long time as you and I know how to handle these little things. I wasn't going to cause a disaster or anything either XD Armando AZ ( talk) 19:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Because of you I'm blocked Alfredo18elguapo ( talk) 23:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

April 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 06:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alfredo18elguapo ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I'm innocent (below).

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. This is not a case of someone coincidentally sharing an IP address at a university. The technical data is clear. Yamla ( talk) 11:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is simply not true that I am a sock of Armando AZ, as I explained in my defense, we both live in the same country and it is likely that we logged into the same site at my university; It should not be something new for you either. Besides the other tests that were given are inconclusive as none share the same activity (a textbook case of cherry-picking!). I will also add for my part that the user who made the complaint was blocked on Spanish Wikipedia for exactly the same thing that I am accused of, in addition to also removing information from reliable sources for I having edited it.

I only ask please that my case be reviewed. Alfredo18elguapo ( talk) 23:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thanks bro, but I manage alone...

Thanks guy!, but it wasn't necessary. I've been on Wikipedia for as long time as you and I know how to handle these little things. I wasn't going to cause a disaster or anything either XD Armando AZ ( talk) 19:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Because of you I'm blocked Alfredo18elguapo ( talk) 23:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply

April 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Moneytrees🏝️ (Talk) 06:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alfredo18elguapo ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I'm innocent (below).

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. This is not a case of someone coincidentally sharing an IP address at a university. The technical data is clear. Yamla ( talk) 11:29, 11 May 2023 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It is simply not true that I am a sock of Armando AZ, as I explained in my defense, we both live in the same country and it is likely that we logged into the same site at my university; It should not be something new for you either. Besides the other tests that were given are inconclusive as none share the same activity (a textbook case of cherry-picking!). I will also add for my part that the user who made the complaint was blocked on Spanish Wikipedia for exactly the same thing that I am accused of, in addition to also removing information from reliable sources for I having edited it.

I only ask please that my case be reviewed. Alfredo18elguapo ( talk) 23:36, 10 May 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook