This template was considered for deletion on 28 February 2022. The result of the discussion was "userfy".

This user page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Quebec This page is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles This page is supported by WikiProject Quebec. COVID-19 This page is within the scope of WikiProject COVID-19, a project to coordinate efforts to improve all COVID-19-related articles. If you would like to help, you are invited to join and to participate in project discussions.COVID-19Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19Template:WikiProject COVID-19COVID-19 articles Disaster management This page is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Medicine: Pulmonology This page is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles This page is supported by the Pulmonology task force. Viruses This page is within the scope of WikiProject Viruses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of viruses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirusesWikipedia:WikiProject VirusesTemplate:WikiProject Virusesvirus articles

I'm don't think we should include deaths in the "per" region breakdown table (e.g. 0 - 1 on march-18). Mainly for two reasons:

1. The first death was in Lanaudière (covered by media and press conference), but the gov. website doesn't publish the death location (at least not yet). This data may not be available as more deaths occur.
2. Those wanting to copy paste the data into a spreadsheet will need to make edits to the data in order to be able to plot it.

Simonuspc ( talk) 04:12, 19 March 2020 (UTC) reply

March 24th had 1013 cases, NOT 1040. Why are my fixes from 1040 to 1013 being reverted back to 1040? See https://web.archive.org/web/20200324220312/https://www.quebec.ca/sante/problemes-de-sante/a-z/coronavirus-2019/situation-coronavirus-quebec/ for confirmation. Humanoid ( talk) 21:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi @ Gau Choob:,

I got a question for you. Where did you get those division? It seems that there are some mistakes. See, 17 (Nunavik) and 18 (Cree territories) are part of 10 (Nord-du-Québec). Also, why are 04, Mauricie and Centre-du-Québec fused? They should be separated, Maurice still being 04 but Centre-du-Québec should be 17.

-- Myloufa ^{Discuss or make Appeal?} 20:02, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

On a couple of occasions, I've wanted to update this chart to fix gaps. However, the INSPQ/government data appears to be provided only on a current basis at the regional level, and the Internet Archive does not appear to have all of the data ( example of 25 July 2020), perhaps owing to the data being loaded (and not fully archived) from a separate .css file on the quebec.ca site.

-- Majromax ( talk) 13:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC) reply

The Aug 9th case is wrong: info from the Minister of Health: ‪#COVID19‬

‪Pour le 9 août:‬ ‪+98 cas | 60 627 ‪+1 décès | 5 696 ‪+1 hospitalisations | 157 ‪-1 soins intensifs | 21 ‪+13 600 prélèvements | 1 372 086

‪1ère fois depuis le 12/07, nous avons - de 100 cas. Une bonne nouvelle, mais on doit continuer nos efforts!‬

‪👉bit.ly/2ZKNOtc‬ Schart28 ( talk) 10:42, 11 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi the Aug 10th cas figures are wrong. https://www.facebook.com/1921285291497710/posts/2389528384673396/?d=n Schart28 ( talk) 13:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC) reply

First thank you to Jcharest57 for updating all this data.

I noticed a problem with Oct 13th data. The cumulative value has an extra 251 compared to what it should be with the 923 new cases. All the following cumulative values are off by that same amount. Am I missing something?

-- Marthnn42 ( talk) 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Yeah, on October 11 and 12, the daily incremental increases reported by the government was inconsistent with the regional running totals and with the provincial running totals. My technique is to calculate the diff between the daily running totals for each region and compare these to the reported daily increases. On both of these days, the values did not match for many of the regions. On Oct 11 it was off by 38 and on Oct 12 it was off by 251. Since the news agencies reported that Montreal had increases of 227 and 274 on Oct 11, 12 respectively, I assumed that the daily incremental values were correct and that the running totals were incorrect. Unfortunately, there is no way of knowing which is correct. I do have the on file the values that I think the daily incremental values should have been for each health region and could update the table. Jcharest57 ( talk) 19:03, 11 November 2020 (UTC) reply