This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I hope you are well.
Um, I hope I'm not bothering you but is there any way you could fix the airdates on the page List of Inspector Gadget 1983 episodes? All of the airdates are wrong.
The series overview is correct but when you look at the episode lists, all of the airdates have been changed to 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Could you please change the dates to the correct airdates?
Thank you in advance. Kaybugg1 ( talk) 04:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Season 2 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:House of the Dragon episode redirects to lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alex! Your Remove redlink script has a bug and it is not working. ~ KHATTAB TALK 17:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect War of the Worlds (upcoming TV series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 7#War of the Worlds (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
according to BBC Shop US The American version of Doctor Who: The Collection Season 22 on Blu-ray region A, Will be released on 10/18/22 (which is October 18, 2022).
Here is the website address: https:shop.bbc.com/products/doctor-who-colin-baker-complete-season-1-blu-ray/
Unfortunately I don’t know how to add references, I never actually do any editing whatsoever on Wikipedia. I only read the articles. i’m looking forward to when it comes out. 2A00:23C5:6307:7F01:F574:112A:5818:3AD9 ( talk) 16:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I've just been reverted by
Indagate (
talk ·
contribs)
here at
Legend of the Sea Devils with the edit summary
Template:Infobox television episode/doc, description of parameter "next" says "if an article or redirect exist, link to it", so seems it should be included even though just redirect. Where is your mentioned consensus please?
. Obviously their point about Infobox television episode is flimsy as the article doesn't use that infobox, but regarding the consensus on Doctor Who episodes to not include links to redirects to series articles, do you know where that came from? I've found evidence of it in 2016
here but I can't figure how that consensus came to be? Thanks --
Ted
Edwards 20:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Where is your mentioned consensus please?. I do not know where that consensus comes from, I just know it exists, but I thought Alex might know the answer, hence I asked him. I'm not starting a discussion here, but before I start the discussion elsewhere, funnily enough I need to know the reasoning for the consensus. In short, I'm trying to find the answer to exactly what you asked so I really can't see why you're complaining. -- Ted Edwards 23:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, wanted to take this out of the MCU Phase Four discussion. I was looking at the table, and was curious if it'd be easiest to make the new parameter |special=
which would take the place of |series=
, changing the column name from "Series" to "Special", and then if that's used, not have the need for |color#S=
, |episodes#S=
, or |link#S=
. Is that what you may have been thinking too? -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 20:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
{{Series overview | series = ''[[Werewolf by Night (TV special)|Werewolf by Night]]'' | infoA = y | infoB = y | infoC = y | color1S = #C95219 | linkT1S = Special | start1S = {{Start date|2022|10|7}} | infoA1S = Heather Quinn and Peter Cameron | infoB1S = [[Michael Giacchino]] | infoC1S = Released }}
{{Series overview | special = ''[[Werewolf by Night (TV special)|Werewolf by Night]]'' | infoA = y | infoB = y | infoC = y | start1 = {{Start date|2022|10|7}} | infoA1 = Heather Quinn and Peter Cameron | infoB1 = [[Michael Giacchino]] | infoC1 = Released }}
Hi Alex. Regarding your revert of my edit, I believe you have made a misapprehension. When I said the BBC News article was a secondary source, this meant it was not the original announcement, it instead reported on that announcement, and therefore the "BBC News" article should not be taken as the "BBC Media Centre" saying Gatwa was playing the "14th Time Lord", as it is not BBC News' responsibility or right to announce information about BBC shows. It is instead the Media Centre that does that, and I have pointed out their announcement made no mention of the "Fourteenth Doctor" or the like. BBC News is not privy to information about shows produced by the BBC anymore than any other news company or producer in the UK, so when BBC News mentioned the "14th Time Lord", they were making the same false assumption fans and other sources made, as it wasn't mentioned in the announcement. -- Ted Edwards 22:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources.If you need to reword the sentence to take away any assumption that the primary source explicitly referred to him as the "14th Time Lord" (which it doesn't), go for it. However, the quote is perfectly acceptable to remain. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts) e.g. who's playing the Doctor, just as well as secondary sources. My point is not that secondary sources shouldn't be used to cite that Gatwa was announced as playing the Doctor earlier this year, my point is using secondary sources to say something that wasn't actually mentioned in the secondary sources' primary source is not OK. It may be worth mentioning that secondary sources e.g. BBC News or The Guardian said he would play the 14th, but the article implies something incorrect when the sentence doesn't mention who
explicitly referred [Gatwa] to as the "14th Time Lord", and the only assumption a reader will make is that is the was the official announcement that made the quote "14th Time Lord", which it didn't. -- Ted Edwards 23:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
point is using secondary sources to say something that wasn't actually mentioned in the secondary sources' primary source is not OK, because based on that, this is where we get the "14th Time Lord" quote. Was it originally said by the BBC? No. Was it later introduced in secondary sources? Yes, and that's perfectly acceptable for usage. If you want to change it to
Ncuti Gatwa had previously been announced [...], and explicitly referred to by BBC News as the "14th Time Lord", then that's perfectly fine, because that's clarifiying who said it. -- Alex_21 TALK 08:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them), only that there able to synthesise facts from facts from one or more primary sources. -- Ted Edwards 16:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:House of the Dragon episode redirects to lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files on Commons can't be moved here, this request can't be fulfilled.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 13:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Alex 21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The Walking Dead: World Beyond".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Alex, just wondering what your edit summary, "The 'visual' split does nothing," means (hyphenation also does nothing?). Horizontal rules are pretty overwhelmingly used for multipart episodes on TV List of episodes pages, including other Star Trek episode lists. And with the specific Picard episodes in question, already with different writers, airdates, and plot summaries split, it makes even more sense to me to also split the episode numbers. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 18:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
<hr>
do that –
does not? The only difference between them is that <hr>
"visualizes" the split more, just as the credits and airdates are actually split in their HTML table row. Out of the modern Star Trek episode lists, the dash is more common. --
Alex_21
TALK 21:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
<hr>
to "visually" split the credits for multi-part episodes as well. This was a severe accessibility issue which was fixed with the |DirectedBy_1=
, |DirectedBy_2=
, etc. parameters, and now we have actual separate hard-coded rows instead of these "visual" splits. We shouldn't be re-introducting them after removing the accessibility issue. Furthermore, "9–10" also reads as "9 to 10", which is the exact meaning of what we're wanting, and the rowspan'ing |EpisodeNumber=
cell should summarize the entirety of the credits row, instead of being separated further. --
Alex_21
TALK 09:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: Series 13 – The Specials (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alex 21. I hope you are well. So this is the first time since the Doctor returned to our screens in '05 that we haven't had a Christmas or New Year's episode. Leon sums it up best for me :-) Best wishes for your 2023! MarnetteD| Talk 04:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doctor Who: Philip Hinchcliffe Presents, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: Philip Hinchcliffe Presents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Alex 21,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 03:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 03:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I am one of the users who use your script to reduce size of non free images. Today, when I uploaded a resized image at Alone (2023 film), the image was not resized. Instead, the size was same. Can you do something to help me? - CallistoR7 ( talk) 08:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Please note that my faulty sources that you have to keep fixing are not my fault, they are done automatically by the source generator after I feed it the URL. Panda815 ( talk) 10:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Template:Franchise total episodes has been nominated for merging with Template:Television franchise episode count. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Indagate ( talk) 20:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 11 soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 12 soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 9 soundtrack.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Alex, apparently the changes you made to fix the Template:Series overview had been reverted because of linter error(?), so now we are back with broken table for mobile version. I'm not sure if you realise it since you haven't been replying on the talk page, so I post this here to let you know. Happy new year. Lulusword (talk) 02:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not going to contest your edit on Disenchantment (TV series), but considering it was over a year between the release of part 3 and part 4, and parts 1 and 2, a possible Part 5 could be released sometime this year. On the other hand, Netflix may have just snubbed the whole series entirely. Its really hard to know. Historyday01 ( talk) 13:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The template says “ Please explain your concerns promptly on the article's talk page. If you do not identify the opinions that are missing, then any editor may remove this tag.”. I did that I believe by adding sources. I hope I have time to use them but if you’re concerned please fix it yourself as I don’t have much time left and I’ve got other projects. This obvious gap in the article came to me because I watched the program. It’s a glaring hole. Doug Weller talk 13:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
if you’re concerned; I'm not concernced about the lack of content at all. That seems to just be you. So,
please fix it yourself as I don’t have much time left and I’ve got other projects. If you notice an unambiguous error or problem that any reasonable person would recommend fixing, the best course of action may be to be bold and fix it yourself [...] In the time it takes to write about the problem, you could instead improve the encyclopedia. -- Alex_21 TALK 10:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't know what should be done about PuppyMonkey. They will not stop making unnecessary changes to well written content. They could use some good mentoring from an editor like you. Stoarm ( talk) 14:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stargirl TV series.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
(Redacted)
Note: Your page move is also in violation of WP:RMUM, you obviously knew this move would be controversial and objectionable and yet you still did it. - SanAnMan ( talk) 20:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, I hope you are well.
Um, I hope I'm not bothering you but is there any way you could fix the airdates on the page List of Inspector Gadget 1983 episodes? All of the airdates are wrong.
The series overview is correct but when you look at the episode lists, all of the airdates have been changed to 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.
Could you please change the dates to the correct airdates?
Thank you in advance. Kaybugg1 ( talk) 04:51, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Season 2 DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:13, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:House of the Dragon episode redirects to lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alex! Your Remove redlink script has a bug and it is not working. ~ KHATTAB TALK 17:20, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect War of the Worlds (upcoming TV series) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 7#War of the Worlds (upcoming TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:33, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
according to BBC Shop US The American version of Doctor Who: The Collection Season 22 on Blu-ray region A, Will be released on 10/18/22 (which is October 18, 2022).
Here is the website address: https:shop.bbc.com/products/doctor-who-colin-baker-complete-season-1-blu-ray/
Unfortunately I don’t know how to add references, I never actually do any editing whatsoever on Wikipedia. I only read the articles. i’m looking forward to when it comes out. 2A00:23C5:6307:7F01:F574:112A:5818:3AD9 ( talk) 16:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi Alex, I've just been reverted by
Indagate (
talk ·
contribs)
here at
Legend of the Sea Devils with the edit summary
Template:Infobox television episode/doc, description of parameter "next" says "if an article or redirect exist, link to it", so seems it should be included even though just redirect. Where is your mentioned consensus please?
. Obviously their point about Infobox television episode is flimsy as the article doesn't use that infobox, but regarding the consensus on Doctor Who episodes to not include links to redirects to series articles, do you know where that came from? I've found evidence of it in 2016
here but I can't figure how that consensus came to be? Thanks --
Ted
Edwards 20:08, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Where is your mentioned consensus please?. I do not know where that consensus comes from, I just know it exists, but I thought Alex might know the answer, hence I asked him. I'm not starting a discussion here, but before I start the discussion elsewhere, funnily enough I need to know the reasoning for the consensus. In short, I'm trying to find the answer to exactly what you asked so I really can't see why you're complaining. -- Ted Edwards 23:33, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey, wanted to take this out of the MCU Phase Four discussion. I was looking at the table, and was curious if it'd be easiest to make the new parameter |special=
which would take the place of |series=
, changing the column name from "Series" to "Special", and then if that's used, not have the need for |color#S=
, |episodes#S=
, or |link#S=
. Is that what you may have been thinking too? -
Favre1fan93 (
talk) 20:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
{{Series overview | series = ''[[Werewolf by Night (TV special)|Werewolf by Night]]'' | infoA = y | infoB = y | infoC = y | color1S = #C95219 | linkT1S = Special | start1S = {{Start date|2022|10|7}} | infoA1S = Heather Quinn and Peter Cameron | infoB1S = [[Michael Giacchino]] | infoC1S = Released }}
{{Series overview | special = ''[[Werewolf by Night (TV special)|Werewolf by Night]]'' | infoA = y | infoB = y | infoC = y | start1 = {{Start date|2022|10|7}} | infoA1 = Heather Quinn and Peter Cameron | infoB1 = [[Michael Giacchino]] | infoC1 = Released }}
Hi Alex. Regarding your revert of my edit, I believe you have made a misapprehension. When I said the BBC News article was a secondary source, this meant it was not the original announcement, it instead reported on that announcement, and therefore the "BBC News" article should not be taken as the "BBC Media Centre" saying Gatwa was playing the "14th Time Lord", as it is not BBC News' responsibility or right to announce information about BBC shows. It is instead the Media Centre that does that, and I have pointed out their announcement made no mention of the "Fourteenth Doctor" or the like. BBC News is not privy to information about shows produced by the BBC anymore than any other news company or producer in the UK, so when BBC News mentioned the "14th Time Lord", they were making the same false assumption fans and other sources made, as it wasn't mentioned in the announcement. -- Ted Edwards 22:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published secondary sources and, to a lesser extent, on tertiary sources and primary sources.If you need to reword the sentence to take away any assumption that the primary source explicitly referred to him as the "14th Time Lord" (which it doesn't), go for it. However, the quote is perfectly acceptable to remain. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts) e.g. who's playing the Doctor, just as well as secondary sources. My point is not that secondary sources shouldn't be used to cite that Gatwa was announced as playing the Doctor earlier this year, my point is using secondary sources to say something that wasn't actually mentioned in the secondary sources' primary source is not OK. It may be worth mentioning that secondary sources e.g. BBC News or The Guardian said he would play the 14th, but the article implies something incorrect when the sentence doesn't mention who
explicitly referred [Gatwa] to as the "14th Time Lord", and the only assumption a reader will make is that is the was the official announcement that made the quote "14th Time Lord", which it didn't. -- Ted Edwards 23:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
point is using secondary sources to say something that wasn't actually mentioned in the secondary sources' primary source is not OK, because based on that, this is where we get the "14th Time Lord" quote. Was it originally said by the BBC? No. Was it later introduced in secondary sources? Yes, and that's perfectly acceptable for usage. If you want to change it to
Ncuti Gatwa had previously been announced [...], and explicitly referred to by BBC News as the "14th Time Lord", then that's perfectly fine, because that's clarifiying who said it. -- Alex_21 TALK 08:06, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
They rely on primary sources for their material, making analytic or evaluative claims about them), only that there able to synthesise facts from facts from one or more primary sources. -- Ted Edwards 16:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Category:House of the Dragon episode redirects to lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:57, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Files on Commons can't be moved here, this request can't be fulfilled.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Alexis Jazz ( talk or ping me) 13:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Alex 21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " The Walking Dead: World Beyond".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:42, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Alex, just wondering what your edit summary, "The 'visual' split does nothing," means (hyphenation also does nothing?). Horizontal rules are pretty overwhelmingly used for multipart episodes on TV List of episodes pages, including other Star Trek episode lists. And with the specific Picard episodes in question, already with different writers, airdates, and plot summaries split, it makes even more sense to me to also split the episode numbers. -- Wikipedical ( talk) 18:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
<hr>
do that –
does not? The only difference between them is that <hr>
"visualizes" the split more, just as the credits and airdates are actually split in their HTML table row. Out of the modern Star Trek episode lists, the dash is more common. --
Alex_21
TALK 21:38, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
<hr>
to "visually" split the credits for multi-part episodes as well. This was a severe accessibility issue which was fixed with the |DirectedBy_1=
, |DirectedBy_2=
, etc. parameters, and now we have actual separate hard-coded rows instead of these "visual" splits. We shouldn't be re-introducting them after removing the accessibility issue. Furthermore, "9–10" also reads as "9 to 10", which is the exact meaning of what we're wanting, and the rowspan'ing |EpisodeNumber=
cell should summarize the entirety of the credits row, instead of being separated further. --
Alex_21
TALK 09:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: Series 13 – The Specials (soundtrack) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 15:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Alex 21. I hope you are well. So this is the first time since the Doctor returned to our screens in '05 that we haven't had a Christmas or New Year's episode. Leon sums it up best for me :-) Best wishes for your 2023! MarnetteD| Talk 04:47, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doctor Who: Philip Hinchcliffe Presents, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctor Who: Philip Hinchcliffe Presents until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Alex 21,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
—
Moops ⋠
T⋡ 03:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
— Moops ⋠ T⋡ 03:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi. I am one of the users who use your script to reduce size of non free images. Today, when I uploaded a resized image at Alone (2023 film), the image was not resized. Instead, the size was same. Can you do something to help me? - CallistoR7 ( talk) 08:29, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Please note that my faulty sources that you have to keep fixing are not my fault, they are done automatically by the source generator after I feed it the URL. Panda815 ( talk) 10:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Template:Franchise total episodes has been nominated for merging with Template:Television franchise episode count. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Indagate ( talk) 20:21, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 11 soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 12 soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:15, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Doctor Who Series 9 soundtrack.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Alex, apparently the changes you made to fix the Template:Series overview had been reverted because of linter error(?), so now we are back with broken table for mobile version. I'm not sure if you realise it since you haven't been replying on the talk page, so I post this here to let you know. Happy new year. Lulusword (talk) 02:33, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not going to contest your edit on Disenchantment (TV series), but considering it was over a year between the release of part 3 and part 4, and parts 1 and 2, a possible Part 5 could be released sometime this year. On the other hand, Netflix may have just snubbed the whole series entirely. Its really hard to know. Historyday01 ( talk) 13:58, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The template says “ Please explain your concerns promptly on the article's talk page. If you do not identify the opinions that are missing, then any editor may remove this tag.”. I did that I believe by adding sources. I hope I have time to use them but if you’re concerned please fix it yourself as I don’t have much time left and I’ve got other projects. This obvious gap in the article came to me because I watched the program. It’s a glaring hole. Doug Weller talk 13:03, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
if you’re concerned; I'm not concernced about the lack of content at all. That seems to just be you. So,
please fix it yourself as I don’t have much time left and I’ve got other projects. If you notice an unambiguous error or problem that any reasonable person would recommend fixing, the best course of action may be to be bold and fix it yourself [...] In the time it takes to write about the problem, you could instead improve the encyclopedia. -- Alex_21 TALK 10:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't know what should be done about PuppyMonkey. They will not stop making unnecessary changes to well written content. They could use some good mentoring from an editor like you. Stoarm ( talk) 14:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Stargirl TV series.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:11, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
(Redacted)
Note: Your page move is also in violation of WP:RMUM, you obviously knew this move would be controversial and objectionable and yet you still did it. - SanAnMan ( talk) 20:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |