Been looking over some of your Wikipedia contributions and although admirable miss a few basic foundation blocks in law.
My great uncle was personal private secretary to Curtin and Chifley and later commissioner of industrial relations. I inherited some documents (placed in secure care in the UK) which outlined the reluctance of Curtin in taking on the Westminster Adoption Act point blank. Other documents form part of my matter I have raised in the SA Supreme Court that caused a 'lock down' by chief justice kourakis and a full bench sitting on appeal to my matter.
I admire your energy and voluminous contribution to Wikipedia, BUT what day do you celebrate Australia's independence? I wrote to John Howard, and the GG, both refused to reply, so a good mate forwarded the intent of my letter to Her majesty, she requested I forward it to her. I received a reply in 8 days that ordered the GG to respond to my request. I visited London 3 months later for a cup of tea and a quite chit chat.
At that time 2004 I was National President of One Nation and with the support of several retired well known legal persons, I viewed several hundred documents proving this fact as an absolute. This was confirmed by both political and legal persons in the UK. So it became a rather large 'oups' moment for Howard but with a bit of effort he was able to shut people up. Thus:
I note that Schedule 7, Part 4 “Seditious intention”; means an intention to effect any of the following purposes: a) To bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt; b) To urge disaffection against the following: i. The Constitution; ii. The Government of the Commonwealth; iii. Either House of the Parliament; c) To urge another person to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, to procure a change to any matter established by law in the Commonwealth; d) To promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups so as to threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
So I look forward to my future endeavours that will shed light on the oversight of where Australia really stands on the Independence issue and just how many Federal and State statute laws will fall once its officially recognised.
Kindest Regards Neil Russell-Taylor Aldgatetroll ( talk) 04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)-- Aldgatetroll ( talk) 04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- I presume this is in relation to
Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942? I suggest you read
Wikipedia:No original research. Even if
- the documents you refer to exist,
- the legal theory your position rests on is sound, and
- you really did have tea with Her Maj,
- Wikipedia content is based on extant knowledge only. -- bainer ( talk) 05:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Been looking over some of your Wikipedia contributions and although admirable miss a few basic foundation blocks in law.
My great uncle was personal private secretary to Curtin and Chifley and later commissioner of industrial relations. I inherited some documents (placed in secure care in the UK) which outlined the reluctance of Curtin in taking on the Westminster Adoption Act point blank. Other documents form part of my matter I have raised in the SA Supreme Court that caused a 'lock down' by chief justice kourakis and a full bench sitting on appeal to my matter.
I admire your energy and voluminous contribution to Wikipedia, BUT what day do you celebrate Australia's independence? I wrote to John Howard, and the GG, both refused to reply, so a good mate forwarded the intent of my letter to Her majesty, she requested I forward it to her. I received a reply in 8 days that ordered the GG to respond to my request. I visited London 3 months later for a cup of tea and a quite chit chat.
At that time 2004 I was National President of One Nation and with the support of several retired well known legal persons, I viewed several hundred documents proving this fact as an absolute. This was confirmed by both political and legal persons in the UK. So it became a rather large 'oups' moment for Howard but with a bit of effort he was able to shut people up. Thus:
I note that Schedule 7, Part 4 “Seditious intention”; means an intention to effect any of the following purposes: a) To bring the Sovereign into hatred or contempt; b) To urge disaffection against the following: i. The Constitution; ii. The Government of the Commonwealth; iii. Either House of the Parliament; c) To urge another person to attempt, otherwise than by lawful means, to procure a change to any matter established by law in the Commonwealth; d) To promote feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups so as to threaten the peace, order and good government of the Commonwealth.
So I look forward to my future endeavours that will shed light on the oversight of where Australia really stands on the Independence issue and just how many Federal and State statute laws will fall once its officially recognised.
Kindest Regards Neil Russell-Taylor Aldgatetroll ( talk) 04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)-- Aldgatetroll ( talk) 04:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- I presume this is in relation to
Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942? I suggest you read
Wikipedia:No original research. Even if
- the documents you refer to exist,
- the legal theory your position rests on is sound, and
- you really did have tea with Her Maj,
- Wikipedia content is based on extant knowledge only. -- bainer ( talk) 05:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)