Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
I noticed (and reverted) some of your edits because they seem to be unreferenced opinion on the subject. Wikipedia articles are not a place to post opinion (see WP:NOT#OR). If these edits reflect the opinion of a reliable source please re-add them citing the source. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 18:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Since you did not indicate to which article you were referring, your comment is of no use to me, especially since I never "post opinion". Aidanbh ( talk) 15:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Wikiisawesome. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Order of operations, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
/wia
/tlk 02:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Colin Kay Please don't add such accusations without references. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Please STOP adding text without references, or you will be blocked from editing. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Altenmann for your aggressive, threatening, homophobic and arrogant response. My personal experience of Kay in my official capacity is more valid than your homophobic toadying to the right wing. If you think that you have the right to block me, please identify the authority. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Aidanbh (
talk •
contribs)
- @
Aidanbh: First, let me emphasize that Altenmann is reminding you of
our policy about verifiability. Keep in mind that we rely on published sources, not
the truth, whatever that is. Also, your accusation that Altenmann is either
"aggressive, threatening, homophobic and arrogant"
is inaccurate and runs afoul of our policy against personal attacks. We have a very diverse editor base here at Wikipedia and no one deserves your brand of defensive knee-jerk vitriol. Yes, if you continue down this road you're going to be dragged to a drama board where you may be blocked. We don't want that as we welcome contributors. Those contributions have to fit within our policies and guidelines and you'd do well to read them. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- @
Aidanbh: First, let me emphasize that Altenmann is reminding you of
our policy about verifiability. Keep in mind that we rely on published sources, not
the truth, whatever that is. Also, your accusation that Altenmann is either
Your links don't work. It was reverted. Please verify your edits with wp:show preview before saving with "Publish changes" Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 06:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
The link(s) are 404: www.unilad.co.uk/news/bible-passage-predicts-end-of-world-in-2018 Also it is not a wp:reliable source. Sensationalizing journalism. Jim1138 ( talk) 18:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
- Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
- You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
- We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
- Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 00:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
I noticed (and reverted) some of your edits because they seem to be unreferenced opinion on the subject. Wikipedia articles are not a place to post opinion (see WP:NOT#OR). If these edits reflect the opinion of a reliable source please re-add them citing the source. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 18:59, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Since you did not indicate to which article you were referring, your comment is of no use to me, especially since I never "post opinion". Aidanbh ( talk) 15:28, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Wikiisawesome. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Order of operations, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to
include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
/wia
/tlk 02:23, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Colin Kay Please don't add such accusations without references. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:39, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Please STOP adding text without references, or you will be blocked from editing. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:43, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you Altenmann for your aggressive, threatening, homophobic and arrogant response. My personal experience of Kay in my official capacity is more valid than your homophobic toadying to the right wing. If you think that you have the right to block me, please identify the authority. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Aidanbh (
talk •
contribs)
- @
Aidanbh: First, let me emphasize that Altenmann is reminding you of
our policy about verifiability. Keep in mind that we rely on published sources, not
the truth, whatever that is. Also, your accusation that Altenmann is either
"aggressive, threatening, homophobic and arrogant"
is inaccurate and runs afoul of our policy against personal attacks. We have a very diverse editor base here at Wikipedia and no one deserves your brand of defensive knee-jerk vitriol. Yes, if you continue down this road you're going to be dragged to a drama board where you may be blocked. We don't want that as we welcome contributors. Those contributions have to fit within our policies and guidelines and you'd do well to read them. Chris Troutman ( talk) 19:21, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
- @
Aidanbh: First, let me emphasize that Altenmann is reminding you of
our policy about verifiability. Keep in mind that we rely on published sources, not
the truth, whatever that is. Also, your accusation that Altenmann is either
Your links don't work. It was reverted. Please verify your edits with wp:show preview before saving with "Publish changes" Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 06:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
The link(s) are 404: www.unilad.co.uk/news/bible-passage-predicts-end-of-world-in-2018 Also it is not a wp:reliable source. Sensationalizing journalism. Jim1138 ( talk) 18:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)