This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Template:Infobox Legislative Assembly of Puerto Rico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Is there a reason you're not using them? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Ahnoneemoos. You've opened a move discussion at Talk:2014 Crimean crisis#Requested move to "Crimean crisis", but except for Bedchamber crisis the actual article is at the upcased title in every case. For example, Suez Crisis. ( Suez crisis is only a redirect, not the real article). Maybe you could widen your search to find examples that favor your proposal? Thanks, EdJohnston 18:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I think we gave Yatsenyuk Government together a rather good lead section. Thanks to us 2! It was a bit of a bumpy ride to get there... But all is well now. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I removed the tags, the article is not yet complete. Its content was splintered from its main source because another user felt that it was too long and it remains unmodified. The other user is not cooperating with the other article after tagging it, so fixing that one remains a priority for the moment. But if you can summarize the body of Sovereignty of PR and expand the lead, I would be grateful. El Alternativo ( talk) 03:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Crimean referendum, 2014, you may be blocked from editing. diff Львівське ( говорити) 15:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Вы за восстановление действия Конституции Республики Крым 1992 года и за статус Крыма как части Украины?
Do you support the restoration of the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea in 1992 and for the status of the Crimea as part of Ukraine ?
Thanks for uploading File:Yuli-mamchur-dialogues-with-pro-russian-forces-in-crimea.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Yuli-mamchur-dialogues-with-pro-russian-forces-in-crimea.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{ Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
You copied a large amount of content from Crimea to Republic of Crimea. Per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, you should have indicated where that content came from in an edit summary. I have to run: please find an appropriate template to indicate this on the article talk page so the article history is at least theoretically preserved; I think WP:RIA has what you need. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 19:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
{{
copied-multi}}
is the template you are looking for. I'm not interesting in doing this clerical work so either report it so that my edits are deleted or request that someone else does this for us. —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 19:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the reminder. Yes, there is some justice, but there are more who still haven't received the MoH that they deserved. By the way, I did some exploring, check out the "Gallery" of pictures that I made in the Camp Verde, Arizona article. I didn't write the article just did the gallery. I am not one to give up, I have a lot to do and see before I kick the bucket. Tony the Marine ( talk) 14:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jojhutton. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JOJ Hutton 18:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Ahnoneemoos. You moved and renamed Supreme Council of Crimea to Crimean Parliament. Did you happen to notice the talk page? Talk:Crimean Parliament#Not the same article This is a contested move. Please move it back or create a new article. Please address this issue on the talk page. Thanks. USchick ( talk) 15:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox multichoice referendum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Sevastopol". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your reversion. It is a different topic, that is the point and if we don't have a separate article most of the images will need to be deleted as they are not fair use for the original article. The original content should never have been in that article as it was about Puerto Rico ON stamps, not the stamps OF Puerto Rico. Thanks. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you participated in a previous move request regarding Crimea and Ukraine, so I thought you might be interested in this new request that is intended to address objections to the previous one. Cheers. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 00:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Saludos, Ahnoneemoos.
I provided the discussion you requested on the Puerto Rico talk page: [2]
Sarason ( talk) 05:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Ok. Dougweller ( talk) 10:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you forget to finish 101st Troop Command and Puerto Rico National Guard Museum? Keep up the good work so far!
Bearian (
talk) 19:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Brian! I have been trying to get more info but I have not had time to visit the National Guard museum yet and I don't think I will be able until Christmas. I think they have a public relations office that can help getting more info in case you are interested in the subject. Take care! —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 23:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I've boldly reverted your tag additions; would it be reasonable for me to ask for a thorough discussion with you first, before you make up your mind?
As of present, the overwhelming majority of third-party media coverage on this individual is in reference to her as an online internet phenomenon, moreso than her actual political life. This internet phenomenon is clearly notable, as demonstrated by the media coverage, and one might even say that much of this person's notability comes from the internet phenomenon, moreso than her position in Crimea. Wikipedia covers plenty of internet phenomenon-related topics, and this happens to be the "latest" online trend, so to speak. Sure, in future we may see more of her presence in the field of politics, however as of present, the significant portion of coverage relating to her is based on her internet following.
To put things into perspective, for the past 10 days or so, 2014 Crimean crisis gets anywhere between 15,000 to 42,000 viewers per day, a significant drop since the page was featured on the Wikipedia front page, however Natalia's article has averaged between 40,000 and 60,000 daily views, which shows just how much she is trending at the moment. In addition, the Russian Wikipedia and Japanese Wikipedia articles are also having large amounts of traffic which overshadow all of the politics-related articles presently trending. This is just how significant this has become. In China and Japan, political news reports about the Crimea crisis are absolutely dwarfed by coverage of Natalia's internet trends. Google and Baidu search trends are skyrocketing, and social media trends on Twitter, Sina Weibo and Vkontakte are following suit. To say that the topic of her internet following is insignificant or of questionable importance as your tagging implies would be, in my opinion, quite contradictory to the real-world evidence out there.
Do you have any disagreements with what I've said? I'm willing to hear out your opinions on the matter. That said, I sure hope I've been convincing enough here. -- benlisquare T• C• E 18:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
She soon caught attention on the Internet because of her particular attractiveness.
A video clip of the press conference was uploaded by a Japanese poster onto YouTube; in English it was titled 'New Attorney General of Crimea is beautiful', in Japanese the title stated 'Too beautiful'. The clip (which featured no translation) quickly racked up more than 300,000 YouTube views within a day.
She went viral in not only Japan, but also China,[13] while receiving coverage from Chinese news outlets like China News Service and Guangming Online.
She was noted to have been discussed on 4chan, Reddit, the Chinese microblog service Weibo, and the Russian social network Vkontakte.
Following her press conference, an onslaught of anime-style moe fanart of Poklonskaya was created and uploaded to the internet, most notably on the Japanese artwork-sharing website Pixiv.
Natalia has stated in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda that since she is often busy with her everyday work, her daughter keeps track of all her online fanart for her.
Following the flood of Poklonskaya fanart, numerous real-life images were discovered on social media sites and also went viral around the world.
Finally, many of the points that you've specifically pointed out are there to be descriptive, so I don't understand the point of pointing them out. The article states that the art come from Pixiv, because the art comes from Pixiv - it doesn't come from Picasso's basement or the back kitchen of a Starbucks. Just like how grass is green, Pixiv is mentioned because the art is from Pixiv. -- benlisquare T• C• E 19:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Would be nice if you left edit summaries and explanation on the talk on what you're doing there. Where did the tables go? Materialscientist ( talk) 21:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate your help in the case of Crimean conflict articles, but your edit [3] didn’t provide attribution for the content you, obviously, copied from Special:PermanentLink/601002537. While known persons break policies of Wikipedia, don’t join them in it. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 05:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
{{
copied}}
which is used exactly for this. From the Talk page I see that that it has already been placed by yourself. So, what exactly is the problem? —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 19:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Please stop uploading files from Commons to Wikipedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey amigo, I think that your ideas on the Flag article were excellent. I did some stuff and I noticed that you did too. Let's hope that everything turns out fine. On the other hand, I want to share with you that today I received a book in the mail titled "Puertorriqueños Who Served With Guts, Glory, and Honor by : Greg Boudonck" where the pages 141 to 147 were about me. It was a total surprise, because I did not expect such an honor. I only expected a special mention because I provided some info. on some of our military heroes but, not a whole thing. Tony the Marine ( talk) 00:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Please check. -- DLommes ( talk) 15:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Would it be possible to re-review the page for Daniel R. Scoggin? Substantial changes have been made to clean up the page, insert citations at the end of paragraphs, and link to other Wikipedia information. Thank you very much, Sandsailor Sandsailor ( talk) 22:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Template:Infobox Legislative Assembly of Puerto Rico has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:49, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Is there a reason you're not using them? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 13:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello Ahnoneemoos. You've opened a move discussion at Talk:2014 Crimean crisis#Requested move to "Crimean crisis", but except for Bedchamber crisis the actual article is at the upcased title in every case. For example, Suez Crisis. ( Suez crisis is only a redirect, not the real article). Maybe you could widen your search to find examples that favor your proposal? Thanks, EdJohnston 18:29, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I think we gave Yatsenyuk Government together a rather good lead section. Thanks to us 2! It was a bit of a bumpy ride to get there... But all is well now. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
I removed the tags, the article is not yet complete. Its content was splintered from its main source because another user felt that it was too long and it remains unmodified. The other user is not cooperating with the other article after tagging it, so fixing that one remains a priority for the moment. But if you can summarize the body of Sovereignty of PR and expand the lead, I would be grateful. El Alternativo ( talk) 03:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Crimean referendum, 2014, you may be blocked from editing. diff Львівське ( говорити) 15:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Вы за восстановление действия Конституции Республики Крым 1992 года и за статус Крыма как части Украины?
Do you support the restoration of the Constitution of the Republic of Crimea in 1992 and for the status of the Crimea as part of Ukraine ?
Thanks for uploading File:Yuli-mamchur-dialogues-with-pro-russian-forces-in-crimea.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 00:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Yuli-mamchur-dialogues-with-pro-russian-forces-in-crimea.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{ Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 01:11, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
You copied a large amount of content from Crimea to Republic of Crimea. Per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia, you should have indicated where that content came from in an edit summary. I have to run: please find an appropriate template to indicate this on the article talk page so the article history is at least theoretically preserved; I think WP:RIA has what you need. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 19:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
{{
copied-multi}}
is the template you are looking for. I'm not interesting in doing this clerical work so either report it so that my edits are deleted or request that someone else does this for us. —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 19:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for the reminder. Yes, there is some justice, but there are more who still haven't received the MoH that they deserved. By the way, I did some exploring, check out the "Gallery" of pictures that I made in the Camp Verde, Arizona article. I didn't write the article just did the gallery. I am not one to give up, I have a lot to do and see before I kick the bucket. Tony the Marine ( talk) 14:57, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jojhutton. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JOJ Hutton 18:03, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Ahnoneemoos. You moved and renamed Supreme Council of Crimea to Crimean Parliament. Did you happen to notice the talk page? Talk:Crimean Parliament#Not the same article This is a contested move. Please move it back or create a new article. Please address this issue on the talk page. Thanks. USchick ( talk) 15:20, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Template:Infobox multichoice referendum has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Sevastopol". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- Guy Macon ( talk) 02:21, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
I reverted your reversion. It is a different topic, that is the point and if we don't have a separate article most of the images will need to be deleted as they are not fair use for the original article. The original content should never have been in that article as it was about Puerto Rico ON stamps, not the stamps OF Puerto Rico. Thanks. Philafrenzy ( talk) 14:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, you participated in a previous move request regarding Crimea and Ukraine, so I thought you might be interested in this new request that is intended to address objections to the previous one. Cheers. Anythingyouwant ( talk) 00:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Saludos, Ahnoneemoos.
I provided the discussion you requested on the Puerto Rico talk page: [2]
Sarason ( talk) 05:46, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Ok. Dougweller ( talk) 10:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you forget to finish 101st Troop Command and Puerto Rico National Guard Museum? Keep up the good work so far!
Bearian (
talk) 19:41, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Brian! I have been trying to get more info but I have not had time to visit the National Guard museum yet and I don't think I will be able until Christmas. I think they have a public relations office that can help getting more info in case you are interested in the subject. Take care! —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 23:05, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
I've boldly reverted your tag additions; would it be reasonable for me to ask for a thorough discussion with you first, before you make up your mind?
As of present, the overwhelming majority of third-party media coverage on this individual is in reference to her as an online internet phenomenon, moreso than her actual political life. This internet phenomenon is clearly notable, as demonstrated by the media coverage, and one might even say that much of this person's notability comes from the internet phenomenon, moreso than her position in Crimea. Wikipedia covers plenty of internet phenomenon-related topics, and this happens to be the "latest" online trend, so to speak. Sure, in future we may see more of her presence in the field of politics, however as of present, the significant portion of coverage relating to her is based on her internet following.
To put things into perspective, for the past 10 days or so, 2014 Crimean crisis gets anywhere between 15,000 to 42,000 viewers per day, a significant drop since the page was featured on the Wikipedia front page, however Natalia's article has averaged between 40,000 and 60,000 daily views, which shows just how much she is trending at the moment. In addition, the Russian Wikipedia and Japanese Wikipedia articles are also having large amounts of traffic which overshadow all of the politics-related articles presently trending. This is just how significant this has become. In China and Japan, political news reports about the Crimea crisis are absolutely dwarfed by coverage of Natalia's internet trends. Google and Baidu search trends are skyrocketing, and social media trends on Twitter, Sina Weibo and Vkontakte are following suit. To say that the topic of her internet following is insignificant or of questionable importance as your tagging implies would be, in my opinion, quite contradictory to the real-world evidence out there.
Do you have any disagreements with what I've said? I'm willing to hear out your opinions on the matter. That said, I sure hope I've been convincing enough here. -- benlisquare T• C• E 18:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
She soon caught attention on the Internet because of her particular attractiveness.
A video clip of the press conference was uploaded by a Japanese poster onto YouTube; in English it was titled 'New Attorney General of Crimea is beautiful', in Japanese the title stated 'Too beautiful'. The clip (which featured no translation) quickly racked up more than 300,000 YouTube views within a day.
She went viral in not only Japan, but also China,[13] while receiving coverage from Chinese news outlets like China News Service and Guangming Online.
She was noted to have been discussed on 4chan, Reddit, the Chinese microblog service Weibo, and the Russian social network Vkontakte.
Following her press conference, an onslaught of anime-style moe fanart of Poklonskaya was created and uploaded to the internet, most notably on the Japanese artwork-sharing website Pixiv.
Natalia has stated in an interview with Komsomolskaya Pravda that since she is often busy with her everyday work, her daughter keeps track of all her online fanart for her.
Following the flood of Poklonskaya fanart, numerous real-life images were discovered on social media sites and also went viral around the world.
Finally, many of the points that you've specifically pointed out are there to be descriptive, so I don't understand the point of pointing them out. The article states that the art come from Pixiv, because the art comes from Pixiv - it doesn't come from Picasso's basement or the back kitchen of a Starbucks. Just like how grass is green, Pixiv is mentioned because the art is from Pixiv. -- benlisquare T• C• E 19:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Would be nice if you left edit summaries and explanation on the talk on what you're doing there. Where did the tables go? Materialscientist ( talk) 21:46, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I appreciate your help in the case of Crimean conflict articles, but your edit [3] didn’t provide attribution for the content you, obviously, copied from Special:PermanentLink/601002537. While known persons break policies of Wikipedia, don’t join them in it. Incnis Mrsi ( talk) 05:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
{{
copied}}
which is used exactly for this. From the Talk page I see that that it has already been placed by yourself. So, what exactly is the problem? —
Ahnoneemoos (
talk) 19:33, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Please stop uploading files from Commons to Wikipedia. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Hey amigo, I think that your ideas on the Flag article were excellent. I did some stuff and I noticed that you did too. Let's hope that everything turns out fine. On the other hand, I want to share with you that today I received a book in the mail titled "Puertorriqueños Who Served With Guts, Glory, and Honor by : Greg Boudonck" where the pages 141 to 147 were about me. It was a total surprise, because I did not expect such an honor. I only expected a special mention because I provided some info. on some of our military heroes but, not a whole thing. Tony the Marine ( talk) 00:39, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Please check. -- DLommes ( talk) 15:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Would it be possible to re-review the page for Daniel R. Scoggin? Substantial changes have been made to clean up the page, insert citations at the end of paragraphs, and link to other Wikipedia information. Thank you very much, Sandsailor Sandsailor ( talk) 22:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)