From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my talk page.

Unblock reqs 1 and 2

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- ferret ( talk) 19:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

It wasn’t me. It was a hacker. Pleas unblock Qazplmwoeiruty pls.

Decline reason:

Obviously not. Yamla ( talk) 20:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I actually got bored and then I vandalized Wikipedia on multiple accounts. I forgot to read the rules before I vandalized Wikipedia. Some time later, I made the Qazplmwoeiruty account and then I quit vandalizing pages and started making constructive edits. Vandalizing Wikipedia on other accounts was a mistake, I will never vandalize Wikipedia ever again.

Decline reason:

Why are you making unblock requests on multiple accounts? Anyway, here's a copypaste of what I said on another account. You currently lack the maturity to contribute to Wikipedia. I guess there's the standard offer, but I would instead suggest that you find a different hobby. Wikipedia is not a free daycare service. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock req #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I didn't mean to make so many vandalism accounts. I have created multiple sockpuppet accounts to vandalize many Wikipedia pages without reading the rules. I have read the rules and I will never vandalize Wikipedia, nor make any more sockpuppet accounts again, ever. Vandalism and sockpuppetry are the worst mistakes I have done here. I promise that I will do constructive edits like a man for now on and I will edit pages on one account only.

Decline reason:

You lied already in an unblock request, so I've no reason to believe you. What NJP said. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 17:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request #4 Revised

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started vandalizing many pages [1] on multiple sockpuppet accounts because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
You should take the advice of the above administrators to heart; your best chance at getting an unblock on this account at some point, if it is at all possible, is to follow the advice at WP:OFFER. Unblocking someone requires trust in that editor to follow the rules, and by lying, very few people are likely to trust you further. What will absolutely not work is sending repeated unblock requests with nothing new. It will not result in an unblock. What will almost certainly happen if you keep going down this path is that an admin will remove your talk page access, meaning you can only ask for an unblock by WP:UTRS which means you can no longer make your case to people who view your page. If you're serious about editing Wikipedia in the future, you ought to retract your unblock request, show you can edit responsibly at another project like Simple Wikipedia, and then with evidence of your constructive editing, ask for an unblock in six months or, even better, a year. CoffeeCrumbs ( talk) 06:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Okay, I won't edit my talk page for a while, But I am really serious about constructive editing Wikipedia next time. I added refs to show evidence that I vandalized (1st ref) and constructively edited (2nd ref) a page. I still promise to make constructive edits on English and Simple Wikipedia. ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( talk) 16:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is my talk page.

Unblock reqs 1 and 2

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
-- ferret ( talk) 19:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

It wasn’t me. It was a hacker. Pleas unblock Qazplmwoeiruty pls.

Decline reason:

Obviously not. Yamla ( talk) 20:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I actually got bored and then I vandalized Wikipedia on multiple accounts. I forgot to read the rules before I vandalized Wikipedia. Some time later, I made the Qazplmwoeiruty account and then I quit vandalizing pages and started making constructive edits. Vandalizing Wikipedia on other accounts was a mistake, I will never vandalize Wikipedia ever again.

Decline reason:

Why are you making unblock requests on multiple accounts? Anyway, here's a copypaste of what I said on another account. You currently lack the maturity to contribute to Wikipedia. I guess there's the standard offer, but I would instead suggest that you find a different hobby. Wikipedia is not a free daycare service. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 01:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock req #3

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I didn't mean to make so many vandalism accounts. I have created multiple sockpuppet accounts to vandalize many Wikipedia pages without reading the rules. I have read the rules and I will never vandalize Wikipedia, nor make any more sockpuppet accounts again, ever. Vandalism and sockpuppetry are the worst mistakes I have done here. I promise that I will do constructive edits like a man for now on and I will edit pages on one account only.

Decline reason:

You lied already in an unblock request, so I've no reason to believe you. What NJP said. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 17:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request #4 Revised

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started vandalizing many pages [1] on multiple sockpuppet accounts because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=A few years ago, I made my original Wikipedia account, 'ALittleCuriousFanatic2020', Although I have never made any contributions on this account until I edited my talk page years later. Sometime in January 2024, I got bored and then I started [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalizing]] many pages [1] on multiple [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet accounts]] because I thought it was funny, which in fact is not. On my final sockpuppet account, 'Qazplmwoeiruty', I read the policies and guidelines and started making constructive edits. [2] I really promise to constructively edit Wikipedia on only one account. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
You should take the advice of the above administrators to heart; your best chance at getting an unblock on this account at some point, if it is at all possible, is to follow the advice at WP:OFFER. Unblocking someone requires trust in that editor to follow the rules, and by lying, very few people are likely to trust you further. What will absolutely not work is sending repeated unblock requests with nothing new. It will not result in an unblock. What will almost certainly happen if you keep going down this path is that an admin will remove your talk page access, meaning you can only ask for an unblock by WP:UTRS which means you can no longer make your case to people who view your page. If you're serious about editing Wikipedia in the future, you ought to retract your unblock request, show you can edit responsibly at another project like Simple Wikipedia, and then with evidence of your constructive editing, ask for an unblock in six months or, even better, a year. CoffeeCrumbs ( talk) 06:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Okay, I won't edit my talk page for a while, But I am really serious about constructive editing Wikipedia next time. I added refs to show evidence that I vandalized (1st ref) and constructively edited (2nd ref) a page. I still promise to make constructive edits on English and Simple Wikipedia. ALittleCuriousFanatic2020 ( talk) 16:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook