|
Hi 1000maex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Your recent editing history at Islam in Assam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mz7 ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- You are perilously close to getting blocked for your actions at Islam in Assam. I strongly suggest you do not edit that page again; instead, discuss your concerns on Talk:Islam in Assam. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Mz7 (
talk) 18:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. GAB gab 14:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
You have persistently edit-warred at Assamese people, People of Assam, Assam, and Islam in Assam to include contested material, even after it has been removed by multiple editors. I see no record of talk-page discussion; rather, you are accusing others of "vandalism" ( [1] [2] [3]). From now on, please either avoid editing these pages altogether or work cooperatively with others by discussing controversial edits on the talkpage. GAB gab 14:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Hi 1000maex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 30 July 2017 (UTC) |
Your recent editing history at Islam in Assam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mz7 ( talk) 17:53, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- You are perilously close to getting blocked for your actions at Islam in Assam. I strongly suggest you do not edit that page again; instead, discuss your concerns on Talk:Islam in Assam. — C.Fred ( talk) 01:28, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Mz7 (
talk) 18:06, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. GAB gab 14:36, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
You have persistently edit-warred at Assamese people, People of Assam, Assam, and Islam in Assam to include contested material, even after it has been removed by multiple editors. I see no record of talk-page discussion; rather, you are accusing others of "vandalism" ( [1] [2] [3]). From now on, please either avoid editing these pages altogether or work cooperatively with others by discussing controversial edits on the talkpage. GAB gab 14:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)