Sorry to bother you, but remember the Indonesian-based vandal who puts misinformation on several Digimon-related articles? He has returned repeated, most recently using the same address a week apart: 118.96.122.158 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Long term blocking may be needed on this address alone. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 09:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Looks as if we have a couple of pop culture-obsessed dingbats creating socks. :) User:Awakened Assassin is definitely Bambifan, but the other apears to be a sock of the equally dweeby User:Onelifefreak2007. Anyone whose username reflects the great love of their life as One Life to Live isn't here to promote higher thinking. Thanks for the alert and for the great catches! Knocked down two chronic vandals in one swipe. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 16:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
When you get a free chance could you take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Revdelete.2C_redux? Thanks -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 19:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
...requiring a five year proxy block, link here. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:46, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps a semi-protect of the pages he's targeting? The chucklefuck doesn't appear to have the brains God gave fish (this is at least one sock IP), so this may discourage him. Half Shadow 21:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
User:Zzuuzz has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
[2] Thanks again. theFace 19:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Bal537 is doing edit warring on Chamar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamar using book links against Indian Govt Website Links that I provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnyissunny ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
So, why would someone on /b/ want to send you death threats? (Yes, yes, I'm a Wikipedian-/b/tard)
—
C
hrishy
01:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
—
C
hrishy
01:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey again. Would you mind checking 83.142.228.98 ( talk · contribs)? Thanks. Elockid ( Talk) 11:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
How about: 204.11.156.134 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 12:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for checking the above. Also this? 124.42.10.119 ( talk · contribs). Elockid ( Talk) 21:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Also: 98.219.5.142 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 20:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
so u think ur smarter than me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.219.1 ( talk) 17:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
61.18.170.156 is a proxy of 62.193.238.56, which you blocked, thanks. I have been finding these weird edits all over the place, before I thought to note them. -- Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) ( talk) 11:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Friendly Cookie has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Enjoy! Cheers, Friendly Cookie ( talk) 06:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
You're fast :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, IP address 75.233.118.219 has been hopping between addresses to vandalise several articles and is now on their final warning we would like you to discuss what to do with them on the ANI (Administrators notice board/incidents)-- Lerdthenerd ( talk) 09:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I saw you made an edit to the List, so I'm assuming you're familiar with some of the vandals listed there. Are you aware of any vandals listed on the list or main page that are no longer active? I'd like to remove or archive their entries if they are no longer active. Thanks. Netalarm talk 21:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Sent you an email. Netalarm talk 22:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I intend starting an an article with this name. It is an all-Irish language school in Clonmel (redlinked there) with no commonly used English name. You previously deleted an article with this title. Is it possible to see what content it held? It may have been written in Irish and contain some info that may be of use. Best. RashersTierney ( talk) 01:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. I clearly didn't do what I'd intended to do. Yworo ( talk) 17:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandalism remnants on Talk:Israel. With all the damage being done, I'm not surprised some of it slipped through the cracks. FYI, I've requested semi-protection of the page for a few hours to see if that will discourage them. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus ( talk) 12:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Elockid ( Talk) 20:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Does this warrant being semiprot'd? My gut instinct would be that 2 or 3 instances a day is borderline deserving of semi-protection, but I can't see anything other than permanent semi-protection doing much long term good due to the subject's popularity/notoriety, and the long-term nature of the vandalism to that page. What are your thoughts? Throwaway85 ( talk) 07:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
I would like to contact you by e-mail regarding a request. Would it be possible? Vile1870 ( talk) 14:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Cookies! | |
for you good work has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
Hi
I have commented on the
page but though you should have these for your work.
I laughed so loud at your comments I got cookie crumbs over my monitor lol
Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- As to the AN/I you just closed, the clear majority/consensus of comments were in favor of a three-month block. I'm not clear if the close was following that. Thanks.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 00:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I also rolled back User:TheAlmightyCollectian's edit to ANI. Not sure who they were, but they immediately sparked my SOCK-o-Meter. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 09:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I think the change I made should work, actually. I remember testing it by starting with the whole code and then whittling it down to just the one line that was triggering that hit, and then removing code even from that one line until the edit was no longer matched. (Because it was easier than searching the paragraphs for the many possible spellings that would match). — Soap — 00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
The recent vandalism edits have been reported to oversight and should be knocked out momentarily. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Is it possible to have semi-protection or pending changes here? The page is turning into an oversight magnet.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Doggone it, it's about time they gave all the admins this tool. Thanks for letting me know! -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 00:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Black hole Award for Vandalism | |
For your recent assistance in sucking all of the vandalism to your talk page, I award you this black hole! |
First, The Thing That Should Not Be, then Shirik, and now you. The good news is that the admins can put AntiAbuseBot to more testing. I have no idea what's going on! mechamind 9 0 23:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I note that you RD2d the vandal's edit. A side effect is that my rollback has also been RD2d. Not a problem really, but is there no way to show that my edit was a rollback of vandalism (even if it doesn't show who the vandal was). Is this just a tech issue? Mjroots ( talk) 12:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Might want to take talk page access away after this post. I was tempted to review the unblock (as I know non-admins can), but I just removed it, but it will probably be put back. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Disruptive edits continue to Cessna 406's talk page, I would recommend removing talk page access for the duration. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
You blocked here, but this is obviously the same editor. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuzz! I know you're familiar with IP networks... I was wondering 1. how do you know/can you tell if an IP is a proxy and 2. if it belongs to a tor? I know it has something to do with the WHOIS but i dont know what to look for. I feel if I knew this, especially the proxy IPs, I could just report them. Thanks :) - Tommy! message 10:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
This IP blocked by you has migrated to 80.42.235.17. -- Skywatcher68 ( talk) 19:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
However much I despise the man <redacted>, that's a good call, to avoid NPOV violations. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
He's back under (presumably) another range - see ANI. Connormah talk 03:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. It's not even my own talk page, but I'm a frequent collaborator, so I see the vandalism every day on my watchlist. Do you think you coud semi-protect his talk page, just to frustrate whoever this is that keeps vandalising? Reply here. Radiopathy •talk• 23:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Could you clarify your edit on the Bree Olson article? The description mentions a "possible BLP issue or vandalism" but since the editor (Tosh90) has been blocked and his edits are not visible I can't figure it out. Just trying to educate myself. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraEdit ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the reverts on my page! Those edits by the IP 201.63.225.2 occurred a few minutes after I left a V4im warning on this user's talk page concerning this edit he made which was inappropriate even in the Sandbox. I don't know if the IP is linked to him, but the timing and content seem to indicate it wasn't a coincidence. Thanks. Taroaldo ( talk) 07:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey There, I just wanted to thank you with your help at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies. I've been working to block open proxies at the Simple English Wikipedia and then have been posting the ones that aren't already blocked here at the wikiproject. Every time I post them, it seems you are the only one taking care of them, so I just wanted to thank you for your hard work!-- Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the open proxies issue, much appreciated. WilliamF1two ( talk) 09:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for handling MickMickelson. Elockid ( Talk) 17:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you protected Lee Jun Ki due to sockpuppetry. I suspect that the user is User:InkHeart, who has been banned but still comes back using anons and sockpuppets. Judging by Special:Contributions/Jenaveev18's recent actions, I believe that it is InkHeart. Is there a way that you can check to verify? Thanks. Ω pho is 19:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I noted this on Ophois' talkpage that I'm certain InkHeart is active again as these 4 users (2 Accounts, 2 IPs) Jenaveev18, Yoyuta, 80.240.202.170, 93.62.4.207. They're engaging in an edit war over headers on Zhang Ziyi and Rain (entertainer) despite being told by multiple editors that consensus matters... typical behavior of InkHeart. on camera (t) 01:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuuzz, I was going through your block log and I was thinking that you should inquire to the arbcom about acquiring checkuser privileges... I think it'd be very useful for you, what do you think? Tommy! message 10:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I didn't get you clearly ... were you asking for the reason I move-protected it? The article has been facing a lot of undiscussed moves recently. So, I move protected it. Since I am not dealing with the content issues, I have not semi-protected it. If you feel to semi-protect it, go ahead and do it. I think, given the unilateral moves of the article, it needs to stay move-protected for a while. -- Ragib ( talk) 20:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Whom is the sockmaster for that one? Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 20:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I strongly believe Yucata.C ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a stock of EunSoo ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Like EunSoo this user removes the Kanji from the name field and when reverted due to changes the subheaders of the articles, he reverts and does not explain his rational for changing. Their edits are too similar to be a coincident. 夢 追人YumeChaser 01:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking that sock. There is one more though. 77.245.75.53 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Sorry about all of this. And apparently this new user JasperViv ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). 夢 追人YumeChaser 19:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please check if this IP is an open proxy: 211.20.175.147 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 19:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Damn you're fast. I should have guessed someone would still have it on their watchlist :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.249.195 ( talk) 16:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey. I suspect that Special:Contributions/174.137.52.208 and Special:Contributions/195.206.96.13 are proxies by InkHeart, based on her tendency to add poorly-sourced episode ratings to Korean series. Ω pho is 18:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
She also appears to be using the proxy Special:Contributions/201.88.254.242 to once again go after my recent edits. Ω pho is 18:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I found User:Yucata.C on that range. I believe it's the user you're targeting the range block at. Just thought you might like to know. -- Deskana (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuzz. I am curious if User:69.37.188.180 is a proxy. I wanna say yes because it's an obvious sock of another IP that was blocked just before it, but I thought I'd come to you first. Thanks Tommy! message 20:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please check 222.168.10.163 ( talk · contribs) and 195.200.118.184 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 00:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I've deleted and salted this. The two most recent accounts creating it are obvious socks, but I don't know whether to file an SPI or? I'm off to bed in any case. Dougweller ( talk) 21:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I don't know exactly why you fully protected this page, but the fact of the matter is that it's not a edit war, it's a case of plain vandalism. The annon user insist that RA2 and Sole Survivor is part of the C&C main universe, while Tiberium Wars and Tiberian Twilight is not, for no other reason then his/her own personal opinion. Anyone familiar with the subject knows that this is completely inaccurate, and also goes against long-standing consensus established through heavy debate in the past. -- MrStalker ( talk) 23:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
FWIW Zzuuzz, my spot check on a couple of the articles linked from the template seems to confirm the spin off vs in-universe-edness of the categorization in the template. I didn't dig deeply enough to discern if there are viable sources for the status quo, but at least the status quo meshes with the template...whereas the IP version is incorrect and unsourced. Syrthiss ( talk) 12:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I have reviewed the block on 222.89.92.106 ( talk · contribs) and suggested it be lifted, though I have put it on hold until the blocking admin comments. As the admin that protected the template, you may wish to comment. CT Cooper · talk 14:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI #2: Given that it has become apparent that there will be little constructive benefit to unblocking the user, with him/her resorting to personal attacks, I have withdrawn my olive branch and declined the unblock request myself. CT Cooper · talk 15:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry to bother you, but remember the Indonesian-based vandal who puts misinformation on several Digimon-related articles? He has returned repeated, most recently using the same address a week apart: 118.96.122.158 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Long term blocking may be needed on this address alone. Thank you. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 09:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Looks as if we have a couple of pop culture-obsessed dingbats creating socks. :) User:Awakened Assassin is definitely Bambifan, but the other apears to be a sock of the equally dweeby User:Onelifefreak2007. Anyone whose username reflects the great love of their life as One Life to Live isn't here to promote higher thinking. Thanks for the alert and for the great catches! Knocked down two chronic vandals in one swipe. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 16:25, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
When you get a free chance could you take a look at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Revdelete.2C_redux? Thanks -- Shirik ( Questions or Comments?) 19:07, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
...requiring a five year proxy block, link here. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 20:46, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps a semi-protect of the pages he's targeting? The chucklefuck doesn't appear to have the brains God gave fish (this is at least one sock IP), so this may discourage him. Half Shadow 21:43, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
User:Zzuuzz has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
[2] Thanks again. theFace 19:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
This is to inform you that Bal537 is doing edit warring on Chamar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamar using book links against Indian Govt Website Links that I provided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnyissunny ( talk • contribs) 05:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
So, why would someone on /b/ want to send you death threats? (Yes, yes, I'm a Wikipedian-/b/tard)
—
C
hrishy
01:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
—
C
hrishy
01:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey again. Would you mind checking 83.142.228.98 ( talk · contribs)? Thanks. Elockid ( Talk) 11:48, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
How about: 204.11.156.134 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 12:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for checking the above. Also this? 124.42.10.119 ( talk · contribs). Elockid ( Talk) 21:19, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Also: 98.219.5.142 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 20:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
so u think ur smarter than me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.219.1 ( talk) 17:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
61.18.170.156 is a proxy of 62.193.238.56, which you blocked, thanks. I have been finding these weird edits all over the place, before I thought to note them. -- Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) ( talk) 11:44, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
Friendly Cookie has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
Enjoy! Cheers, Friendly Cookie ( talk) 06:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
You're fast :-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:13, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, IP address 75.233.118.219 has been hopping between addresses to vandalise several articles and is now on their final warning we would like you to discuss what to do with them on the ANI (Administrators notice board/incidents)-- Lerdthenerd ( talk) 09:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I saw you made an edit to the List, so I'm assuming you're familiar with some of the vandals listed there. Are you aware of any vandals listed on the list or main page that are no longer active? I'd like to remove or archive their entries if they are no longer active. Thanks. Netalarm talk 21:10, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Sent you an email. Netalarm talk 22:03, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I intend starting an an article with this name. It is an all-Irish language school in Clonmel (redlinked there) with no commonly used English name. You previously deleted an article with this title. Is it possible to see what content it held? It may have been written in Irish and contain some info that may be of use. Best. RashersTierney ( talk) 01:18, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing that. I clearly didn't do what I'd intended to do. Yworo ( talk) 17:42, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for catching the vandalism remnants on Talk:Israel. With all the damage being done, I'm not surprised some of it slipped through the cracks. FYI, I've requested semi-protection of the page for a few hours to see if that will discourage them. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus ( talk) 12:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. Elockid ( Talk) 20:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
Does this warrant being semiprot'd? My gut instinct would be that 2 or 3 instances a day is borderline deserving of semi-protection, but I can't see anything other than permanent semi-protection doing much long term good due to the subject's popularity/notoriety, and the long-term nature of the vandalism to that page. What are your thoughts? Throwaway85 ( talk) 07:22, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
I would like to contact you by e-mail regarding a request. Would it be possible? Vile1870 ( talk) 14:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
Cookies! | |
for you good work has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}! |
Hi
I have commented on the
page but though you should have these for your work.
I laughed so loud at your comments I got cookie crumbs over my monitor lol
Chaosdruid ( talk) 17:46, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi -- As to the AN/I you just closed, the clear majority/consensus of comments were in favor of a three-month block. I'm not clear if the close was following that. Thanks.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 00:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I also rolled back User:TheAlmightyCollectian's edit to ANI. Not sure who they were, but they immediately sparked my SOCK-o-Meter. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 09:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
I think the change I made should work, actually. I remember testing it by starting with the whole code and then whittling it down to just the one line that was triggering that hit, and then removing code even from that one line until the edit was no longer matched. (Because it was easier than searching the paragraphs for the many possible spellings that would match). — Soap — 00:11, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
The recent vandalism edits have been reported to oversight and should be knocked out momentarily. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 21:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
Is it possible to have semi-protection or pending changes here? The page is turning into an oversight magnet.-- ♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 19:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Doggone it, it's about time they gave all the admins this tool. Thanks for letting me know! -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 00:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
![]() |
The Black hole Award for Vandalism | |
For your recent assistance in sucking all of the vandalism to your talk page, I award you this black hole! |
First, The Thing That Should Not Be, then Shirik, and now you. The good news is that the admins can put AntiAbuseBot to more testing. I have no idea what's going on! mechamind 9 0 23:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I note that you RD2d the vandal's edit. A side effect is that my rollback has also been RD2d. Not a problem really, but is there no way to show that my edit was a rollback of vandalism (even if it doesn't show who the vandal was). Is this just a tech issue? Mjroots ( talk) 12:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Might want to take talk page access away after this post. I was tempted to review the unblock (as I know non-admins can), but I just removed it, but it will probably be put back. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 19:47, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Disruptive edits continue to Cessna 406's talk page, I would recommend removing talk page access for the duration. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 03:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
You blocked here, but this is obviously the same editor. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 02:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuzz! I know you're familiar with IP networks... I was wondering 1. how do you know/can you tell if an IP is a proxy and 2. if it belongs to a tor? I know it has something to do with the WHOIS but i dont know what to look for. I feel if I knew this, especially the proxy IPs, I could just report them. Thanks :) - Tommy! message 10:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
This IP blocked by you has migrated to 80.42.235.17. -- Skywatcher68 ( talk) 19:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
However much I despise the man <redacted>, that's a good call, to avoid NPOV violations. -- Orange Mike | Talk 00:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
He's back under (presumably) another range - see ANI. Connormah talk 03:23, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello. It's not even my own talk page, but I'm a frequent collaborator, so I see the vandalism every day on my watchlist. Do you think you coud semi-protect his talk page, just to frustrate whoever this is that keeps vandalising? Reply here. Radiopathy •talk• 23:45, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Could you clarify your edit on the Bree Olson article? The description mentions a "possible BLP issue or vandalism" but since the editor (Tosh90) has been blocked and his edits are not visible I can't figure it out. Just trying to educate myself. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by UltraEdit ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for the reverts on my page! Those edits by the IP 201.63.225.2 occurred a few minutes after I left a V4im warning on this user's talk page concerning this edit he made which was inappropriate even in the Sandbox. I don't know if the IP is linked to him, but the timing and content seem to indicate it wasn't a coincidence. Thanks. Taroaldo ( talk) 07:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey There, I just wanted to thank you with your help at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies. I've been working to block open proxies at the Simple English Wikipedia and then have been posting the ones that aren't already blocked here at the wikiproject. Every time I post them, it seems you are the only one taking care of them, so I just wanted to thank you for your hard work!-- Gordonrox24 | Talk 15:14, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on the open proxies issue, much appreciated. WilliamF1two ( talk) 09:28, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for handling MickMickelson. Elockid ( Talk) 17:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you protected Lee Jun Ki due to sockpuppetry. I suspect that the user is User:InkHeart, who has been banned but still comes back using anons and sockpuppets. Judging by Special:Contributions/Jenaveev18's recent actions, I believe that it is InkHeart. Is there a way that you can check to verify? Thanks. Ω pho is 19:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I noted this on Ophois' talkpage that I'm certain InkHeart is active again as these 4 users (2 Accounts, 2 IPs) Jenaveev18, Yoyuta, 80.240.202.170, 93.62.4.207. They're engaging in an edit war over headers on Zhang Ziyi and Rain (entertainer) despite being told by multiple editors that consensus matters... typical behavior of InkHeart. on camera (t) 01:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuuzz, I was going through your block log and I was thinking that you should inquire to the arbcom about acquiring checkuser privileges... I think it'd be very useful for you, what do you think? Tommy! message 10:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I didn't get you clearly ... were you asking for the reason I move-protected it? The article has been facing a lot of undiscussed moves recently. So, I move protected it. Since I am not dealing with the content issues, I have not semi-protected it. If you feel to semi-protect it, go ahead and do it. I think, given the unilateral moves of the article, it needs to stay move-protected for a while. -- Ragib ( talk) 20:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Whom is the sockmaster for that one? Kevin Rutherford ( talk) 20:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
I strongly believe Yucata.C ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is a stock of EunSoo ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Like EunSoo this user removes the Kanji from the name field and when reverted due to changes the subheaders of the articles, he reverts and does not explain his rational for changing. Their edits are too similar to be a coincident. 夢 追人YumeChaser 01:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking that sock. There is one more though. 77.245.75.53 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Sorry about all of this. And apparently this new user JasperViv ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). 夢 追人YumeChaser 19:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please check if this IP is an open proxy: 211.20.175.147 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 19:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Damn you're fast. I should have guessed someone would still have it on their watchlist :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.249.195 ( talk) 16:14, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Hey. I suspect that Special:Contributions/174.137.52.208 and Special:Contributions/195.206.96.13 are proxies by InkHeart, based on her tendency to add poorly-sourced episode ratings to Korean series. Ω pho is 18:01, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
She also appears to be using the proxy Special:Contributions/201.88.254.242 to once again go after my recent edits. Ω pho is 18:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
I found User:Yucata.C on that range. I believe it's the user you're targeting the range block at. Just thought you might like to know. -- Deskana (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi zzuzz. I am curious if User:69.37.188.180 is a proxy. I wanna say yes because it's an obvious sock of another IP that was blocked just before it, but I thought I'd come to you first. Thanks Tommy! message 20:44, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please check 222.168.10.163 ( talk · contribs) and 195.200.118.184 ( talk · contribs)? Elockid ( Talk) 00:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
I've deleted and salted this. The two most recent accounts creating it are obvious socks, but I don't know whether to file an SPI or? I'm off to bed in any case. Dougweller ( talk) 21:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello. I don't know exactly why you fully protected this page, but the fact of the matter is that it's not a edit war, it's a case of plain vandalism. The annon user insist that RA2 and Sole Survivor is part of the C&C main universe, while Tiberium Wars and Tiberian Twilight is not, for no other reason then his/her own personal opinion. Anyone familiar with the subject knows that this is completely inaccurate, and also goes against long-standing consensus established through heavy debate in the past. -- MrStalker ( talk) 23:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
FWIW Zzuuzz, my spot check on a couple of the articles linked from the template seems to confirm the spin off vs in-universe-edness of the categorization in the template. I didn't dig deeply enough to discern if there are viable sources for the status quo, but at least the status quo meshes with the template...whereas the IP version is incorrect and unsourced. Syrthiss ( talk) 12:12, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI, I have reviewed the block on 222.89.92.106 ( talk · contribs) and suggested it be lifted, though I have put it on hold until the blocking admin comments. As the admin that protected the template, you may wish to comment. CT Cooper · talk 14:17, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
FYI #2: Given that it has become apparent that there will be little constructive benefit to unblocking the user, with him/her resorting to personal attacks, I have withdrawn my olive branch and declined the unblock request myself. CT Cooper · talk 15:28, 6 August 2010 (UTC)