Talk to me : )
Hello! I read your page on Gaia Afrania. I think you picked an excellent topic to expand upon. At this point, I'm having a bit of trouble understanding exactly what Gala Afrania is known for, or what her significant role in Women's studies is. I can see the direction you're heading in, but the Wiki page as a whole still needs a lot of expansion. The good thing is, though, that it seems like you have a very clear idea of the assignment and are already headed in the proper direction. If you use this topic for your final Wiki edit, I think you'll be able to make a very strong piece. So far, all of your citations and internal links look correct. I think what you have written so far flows nicely and is in a proper chronological order. With just a bit more expanding, I think this could be a great article! Good Luck! Whitek67 ( talk) 14:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Good evening. I thought your edits were great! I saw no grammatical errors. However, I agree that there is little relation between this topic and women studies. I notice the your references were all the same style. Additionally, I think that each citation needs to be a separate link. Lastly, I think that this topic will be great for your article , but you definitely need to expand on how this relates to women studies. [[User:seunathm|seunathm] ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.219.212 ( talk) 00:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Talk to me : )
Hello! I read your page on Gaia Afrania. I think you picked an excellent topic to expand upon. At this point, I'm having a bit of trouble understanding exactly what Gala Afrania is known for, or what her significant role in Women's studies is. I can see the direction you're heading in, but the Wiki page as a whole still needs a lot of expansion. The good thing is, though, that it seems like you have a very clear idea of the assignment and are already headed in the proper direction. If you use this topic for your final Wiki edit, I think you'll be able to make a very strong piece. So far, all of your citations and internal links look correct. I think what you have written so far flows nicely and is in a proper chronological order. With just a bit more expanding, I think this could be a great article! Good Luck! Whitek67 ( talk) 14:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Good evening. I thought your edits were great! I saw no grammatical errors. However, I agree that there is little relation between this topic and women studies. I notice the your references were all the same style. Additionally, I think that each citation needs to be a separate link. Lastly, I think that this topic will be great for your article , but you definitely need to expand on how this relates to women studies. [[User:seunathm|seunathm] ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.45.219.212 ( talk) 00:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)