|
When someone reverts your edits, look at the reason why — it was provided by myself *twice*. The notability policy for the page was established at the creation of the page. If you don’t agree with the policy, take it to the talk page. — Andy Anderson 05:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Zlassiter,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
John from Idegon (
talk)
01:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pratik Chougule, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Booyahhayoob ( talk) 06:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Please look at WP:WTAF. It is a well accepted essay on what WP:NOTABLE is about. Accordingly, when we do not see a WP article about a particular subject editors generally reject citations which do not refer to WP:NOTABLE persons or sources. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 06:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
You are a bit WP:PRECOCIOUS. Am I wrong? – S. Rich ( talk) 06:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This isn't an issue of vanalism, it's an editing dispute. Discuss your content changes on the talk -- do not edit war further, otherwise you'll find yourself
here. Best, —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
07:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
|
When someone reverts your edits, look at the reason why — it was provided by myself *twice*. The notability policy for the page was established at the creation of the page. If you don’t agree with the policy, take it to the talk page. — Andy Anderson 05:58, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! Zlassiter,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
John from Idegon (
talk)
01:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
|
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pratik Chougule, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Booyahhayoob ( talk) 06:02, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Please look at WP:WTAF. It is a well accepted essay on what WP:NOTABLE is about. Accordingly, when we do not see a WP article about a particular subject editors generally reject citations which do not refer to WP:NOTABLE persons or sources. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 06:06, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
You are a bit WP:PRECOCIOUS. Am I wrong? – S. Rich ( talk) 06:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at List of Republicans opposing Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This isn't an issue of vanalism, it's an editing dispute. Discuss your content changes on the talk -- do not edit war further, otherwise you'll find yourself
here. Best, —
MelbourneStar☆
talk
07:48, 10 October 2016 (UTC)