![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Baxter (baseball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that has contributed to the recent WP:GA promotion of Larry Doby
![]() | This user helped promote Larry Doby to good article status. |
-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 23:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings. Your recent edit of Brian McCann accidentally wiped out the article photo. I reverted it. Regards. Tapered ( talk) 08:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I believe I've done most of what you suggested in your PR of Jim Thome. Would you mind taking another look? Go Phightins! ( talk) 21:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
How exactly is putting the actual two best non-divisional teams (most people likely don't know who were the runner ups in the Wild Card prior to 2012 and clearly only pertains to the 1995 onward era) in a one-game playoff prior to the implementation of the MLB Wild Card Game a true "what if" scenario!? You really seem to be thinking way beyond or ahead of another wise basic scenario (like thinking about how differently a manager would operate and what not). A what if scenario would be which team would have a better chance of winning, thus altering the playoff outlook (and possibly even further than that). Another actual what if scenario would be speculating how the cancelled 1994 season would've ended if it weren't for the strike. And using Lou Gerhig as an analogy doesn't make sense because that has nothing to due w/ using a final statistic (we can at that rate, go on all day about how much differently a player's career might have turned out had they not gotten injured), like end of season records as a main point of reference. BornonJune8 ( talk) 07:09 p.m., 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I see that you've recently tagged a few baseball players with {{ BLP unreferenced}}. This is only meant to be used where there are no links or refs to support any of the info. For articles with references that are incorrectly formated or listed in an External links section, then {{ BLP sources}} and {{ No footnotes}} are more informative as to what needs to be done. Of course the external link must be specific to the person, not just to his team/school etc, but generally the stats sites are able to confirm some of the info so should be marked as needing more and no footnotes. Cheers, The-Pope ( talk) 12:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 15:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenny Lofton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun Journal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 19:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Long time, Mr. Z. Please forgive me if this is old news 2U (never exactly sure who's alerted to what actions on WP), but, long story short, I posted a pretty massive re-edit on JS a couple of days ago (the edit, that is, not the length of the resulting version), which, it seems, was seen by one person only - alas, the ubiquitous Author-Author, who, typically, rather than comment on any of the new material (heavily documented and, whether sufficient or not, clearly relevant to notability), chose to 'critique' a completely irrelevant transitional sentence already present in the original. And now the article is deleted. Fortunately (due to my increasingly sputtering Mac), during each edit, I save my work to email numerous times, so it was easy enough to recreate my latest draft on my talk page, which is exactly what I've done. It's parked there right now, and I'd deeply appreciate u giving it a look. Don't know if it would lead to a different outcome, but it is a seriously different document than the one voted on by u & others several days ago and I'd very much value your feedback. DavidESpeed ( talk) 04:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in
vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately
warned. Please note there is a difference between
vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in
good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Also the edits have to be recent, you issued two warnings for edits made over a year ago. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
23:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your improvements to the refs for this article, but I don't see what they have to do with me. In a couple of case I changed publisher=newspaper to work=newspaper. There were other similar improvements I could have made but didn't notice, but at no point did I add a publisher parameter. And I don't see the benefit in cases like the Washington Post or Baseball-Reference.com. Knowing the publisher doesn't help anyone who's tracking down the reference, and in any case it's readily available from the publication's article. The guidelines for using the cite templates recommend omitting publisher for well-known periodicals (See here). (And BTW, the New York Times Company is the owner of the NYT; Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. is the publisher.) Colonies Chris ( talk) 17:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Addie Joss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Western League and One-hitter ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't have any experience with creating edit notices, but if memory serves, you have worked on one for the baseball project in the past. I would like to make an edit notice for the college football coaches reminding IP's that update the win–loss record to update it both in the infobox and in the record table. There have been several times, the most recent being on Frank Solich, where an IP only updated part of the info that needed to be updated. I'd appreciate any help you could provide here. Automatic Strikeout 17:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in the GA review of Jim Thome; your feedback has been invaluable to the article's development. I was wondering if you had any further suggestions for the article...I believe I've addressed in some fashion all of your queries thus far and hadn't seen anything new in the last few days. There's no rush, but I just wanted to see what else needed to be done. Thanks-- Go Phightins ! 18:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
If there's confusion about Heath's birth year, this image of his headstone should put it to rest. A headstone is a pretty reliable source for someone's age -- probably better than a UPI article! -- Batard0 ( talk) 18:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 04:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Just checking in on this; it has now been open a week. If you are still planning to work on it, I've no problem keeping it open for at least another week. It's pretty close to GA now; several of my points strictly speaking do not concern the GA criteria, and how much attention you pay to them is up to you. I won't be at all offended if you tell me where to go on one or two of them! I would recommend doing something about the general points, though. Sarastro1 ( talk) 20:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I've listed Kenny Lofton as a GA. Thanks for all your work on it, and Merry Christmas to you and your family! Go Phightins ! 03:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Jason Kipnis to good article status. |
On behalf of
WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to
Jason Kipnis, which has recently become a GA. --
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
00:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Jim Thome to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Mike Garcia (AL pitcher) to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Kenny Lofton to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Bob Lemon to good article status. |
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi t | c 21:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings fellow Wikipedia editor -
I am leaving you this note because I have reason to believe that you are interested in C-SPAN. (I may have made this assumption based on your C-SPAN user box, or perhaps for some other reason.) If this is not an interest of yours, please feel free to read no further and delete this message.
If you are in fact someone who is interested in C-SPAN, then let me put forward an idea that I have been kicking around for a while. What if we started a C-SPAN WikiProject?
The parameters of this (potential) project are up for discussion, but it could include some or all of the following (as well as things that may occur to you that have not occurred to me):
I don't know exactly how far we may want to go, nor in what directions, but I do believe ( as I have long noted on my user page) that C-SPAN and Wikipedia are both...
...fantastic vehicles for the free exchange of ideas and information in a non-sound-bite manner, and they both invite the participation of any parties (expert or amateur) who are interested in taking the time to absorb and/or contribute to the ideas and information offered. C-SPAN and Wikipedia go together like peanut butter and jelly, and I want to help give other Wiki users easy access to the great work that C-SPAN has done on a variety of topics.
Now, I should mention that I have never started a WikiProject before, and I do not know the best way to go about it. (Perhaps one of you do?) Let me offer one of my sandbox pages, User:KConWiki/sandbox/Wikiproject C-SPAN?, as a gathering area for comments until such time as we gather enough steam to start our own WikiProject page.
Thanks for reading this far, and I hope that you will give some consideration as to whether this is something we ought to attempt. Please feel free to pass this message on to others you know whom might be interested, and please let me know your thoughts and comments.
KConWiki ( talk) 02:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey! I've done a major redesign of The Wikipedia Library portal. As one of our original volunteers, I'd love you to check it out, pick a role, create a profile to share your story and skills, sign up for the newsletter, and see how you can get involved. I'd also be interested in having a skype chat with you in the next few weeks to see how we can best put your energy to use (or email if that's better for you). Hope you're doing well, Ocaasi t | c 13:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Bob Feller know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 3, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite ( talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 3, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Bob Feller (1918–2010) was an American baseball pitcher who played 18 seasons in Major League Baseball for the Cleveland Indians. Feller pitched from 1936 to 1941 and from 1945 to 1956, interrupted by wartime service in the U.S. Navy. In a career spanning 570 games, Feller pitched 3,827 innings and posted a win–loss record of 266–162, with 279 complete games, 44 shutouts, and a 3.25 earned run average. He first played for the Indians aged 17 and was the first pitcher to win 24 games in a season before the age of 21. He threw no-hitters in 1940, 1946, and 1951 and also recorded 12 one-hitters; his no-hitters and one-hitters were records at the time of his retirement. He helped the Indians win a World Series title in 1948 and an American League-record 111 wins and the pennant in 1954. Feller led the American League in wins six times and in strikeouts seven times. In 1946, he recorded 348 strikeouts, a total not exceeded for 27 years. An eight-time All-Star, Feller was 36th on Sporting News's list of the 100 Greatest Baseball Players and was named the publication's "greatest pitcher of his time". He was a finalist for the Major League Baseball All-Century Team in 1999. ( Full article...)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mike Baxter (baseball), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United State ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial efforts that has contributed to the recent WP:GA promotion of Larry Doby
![]() | This user helped promote Larry Doby to good article status. |
-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 23:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Greetings. Your recent edit of Brian McCann accidentally wiped out the article photo. I reverted it. Regards. Tapered ( talk) 08:52, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
I believe I've done most of what you suggested in your PR of Jim Thome. Would you mind taking another look? Go Phightins! ( talk) 21:42, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
How exactly is putting the actual two best non-divisional teams (most people likely don't know who were the runner ups in the Wild Card prior to 2012 and clearly only pertains to the 1995 onward era) in a one-game playoff prior to the implementation of the MLB Wild Card Game a true "what if" scenario!? You really seem to be thinking way beyond or ahead of another wise basic scenario (like thinking about how differently a manager would operate and what not). A what if scenario would be which team would have a better chance of winning, thus altering the playoff outlook (and possibly even further than that). Another actual what if scenario would be speculating how the cancelled 1994 season would've ended if it weren't for the strike. And using Lou Gerhig as an analogy doesn't make sense because that has nothing to due w/ using a final statistic (we can at that rate, go on all day about how much differently a player's career might have turned out had they not gotten injured), like end of season records as a main point of reference. BornonJune8 ( talk) 07:09 p.m., 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I see that you've recently tagged a few baseball players with {{ BLP unreferenced}}. This is only meant to be used where there are no links or refs to support any of the info. For articles with references that are incorrectly formated or listed in an External links section, then {{ BLP sources}} and {{ No footnotes}} are more informative as to what needs to be done. Of course the external link must be specific to the person, not just to his team/school etc, but generally the stats sites are able to confirm some of the info so should be marked as needing more and no footnotes. Cheers, The-Pope ( talk) 12:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 15:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kenny Lofton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sun Journal ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:21, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 19:18, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Long time, Mr. Z. Please forgive me if this is old news 2U (never exactly sure who's alerted to what actions on WP), but, long story short, I posted a pretty massive re-edit on JS a couple of days ago (the edit, that is, not the length of the resulting version), which, it seems, was seen by one person only - alas, the ubiquitous Author-Author, who, typically, rather than comment on any of the new material (heavily documented and, whether sufficient or not, clearly relevant to notability), chose to 'critique' a completely irrelevant transitional sentence already present in the original. And now the article is deleted. Fortunately (due to my increasingly sputtering Mac), during each edit, I save my work to email numerous times, so it was easy enough to recreate my latest draft on my talk page, which is exactly what I've done. It's parked there right now, and I'd deeply appreciate u giving it a look. Don't know if it would lead to a different outcome, but it is a seriously different document than the one voted on by u & others several days ago and I'd very much value your feedback. DavidESpeed ( talk) 04:38, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report on
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and
all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in
vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately
warned. Please note there is a difference between
vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in
good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Also the edits have to be recent, you issued two warnings for edits made over a year ago. Thank you.
5 albert square (
talk)
23:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your improvements to the refs for this article, but I don't see what they have to do with me. In a couple of case I changed publisher=newspaper to work=newspaper. There were other similar improvements I could have made but didn't notice, but at no point did I add a publisher parameter. And I don't see the benefit in cases like the Washington Post or Baseball-Reference.com. Knowing the publisher doesn't help anyone who's tracking down the reference, and in any case it's readily available from the publication's article. The guidelines for using the cite templates recommend omitting publisher for well-known periodicals (See here). (And BTW, the New York Times Company is the owner of the NYT; Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr. is the publisher.) Colonies Chris ( talk) 17:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Addie Joss, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Western League and One-hitter ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't have any experience with creating edit notices, but if memory serves, you have worked on one for the baseball project in the past. I would like to make an edit notice for the college football coaches reminding IP's that update the win–loss record to update it both in the infobox and in the record table. There have been several times, the most recent being on Frank Solich, where an IP only updated part of the info that needed to be updated. I'd appreciate any help you could provide here. Automatic Strikeout 17:16, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your help in the GA review of Jim Thome; your feedback has been invaluable to the article's development. I was wondering if you had any further suggestions for the article...I believe I've addressed in some fashion all of your queries thus far and hadn't seen anything new in the last few days. There's no rush, but I just wanted to see what else needed to be done. Thanks-- Go Phightins ! 18:33, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
If there's confusion about Heath's birth year, this image of his headstone should put it to rest. A headstone is a pretty reliable source for someone's age -- probably better than a UPI article! -- Batard0 ( talk) 18:27, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Go Phightins ! 04:42, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
Just checking in on this; it has now been open a week. If you are still planning to work on it, I've no problem keeping it open for at least another week. It's pretty close to GA now; several of my points strictly speaking do not concern the GA criteria, and how much attention you pay to them is up to you. I won't be at all offended if you tell me where to go on one or two of them! I would recommend doing something about the general points, though. Sarastro1 ( talk) 20:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
I've listed Kenny Lofton as a GA. Thanks for all your work on it, and Merry Christmas to you and your family! Go Phightins ! 03:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Jason Kipnis to good article status. |
On behalf of
WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to
Jason Kipnis, which has recently become a GA. --
TonyTheTiger (
T/
C/
BIO/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:FOUR)
00:49, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This user helped promote Jim Thome to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Mike Garcia (AL pitcher) to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Kenny Lofton to good article status. |
![]() | This user helped promote Bob Lemon to good article status. |
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!
Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 18:25, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the disruption but apparently the email bot failed. We'll resend the codes this week. (note: If you were notified directly that your email preferences were not enabled, you still need to contact Ocaasi). Cheers, User:Ocaasi 21:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Check your email. Enjoy! Ocaasi t | c 21:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Greetings fellow Wikipedia editor -
I am leaving you this note because I have reason to believe that you are interested in C-SPAN. (I may have made this assumption based on your C-SPAN user box, or perhaps for some other reason.) If this is not an interest of yours, please feel free to read no further and delete this message.
If you are in fact someone who is interested in C-SPAN, then let me put forward an idea that I have been kicking around for a while. What if we started a C-SPAN WikiProject?
The parameters of this (potential) project are up for discussion, but it could include some or all of the following (as well as things that may occur to you that have not occurred to me):
I don't know exactly how far we may want to go, nor in what directions, but I do believe ( as I have long noted on my user page) that C-SPAN and Wikipedia are both...
...fantastic vehicles for the free exchange of ideas and information in a non-sound-bite manner, and they both invite the participation of any parties (expert or amateur) who are interested in taking the time to absorb and/or contribute to the ideas and information offered. C-SPAN and Wikipedia go together like peanut butter and jelly, and I want to help give other Wiki users easy access to the great work that C-SPAN has done on a variety of topics.
Now, I should mention that I have never started a WikiProject before, and I do not know the best way to go about it. (Perhaps one of you do?) Let me offer one of my sandbox pages, User:KConWiki/sandbox/Wikiproject C-SPAN?, as a gathering area for comments until such time as we gather enough steam to start our own WikiProject page.
Thanks for reading this far, and I hope that you will give some consideration as to whether this is something we ought to attempt. Please feel free to pass this message on to others you know whom might be interested, and please let me know your thoughts and comments.
KConWiki ( talk) 02:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Hey! I've done a major redesign of The Wikipedia Library portal. As one of our original volunteers, I'd love you to check it out, pick a role, create a profile to share your story and skills, sign up for the newsletter, and see how you can get involved. I'd also be interested in having a skype chat with you in the next few weeks to see how we can best put your energy to use (or email if that's better for you). Hope you're doing well, Ocaasi t | c 13:25, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
This is a note to let the main editors of Bob Feller know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on November 3, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite ( talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 3, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:
Bob Feller (1918–2010) was an American baseball pitcher who played 18 seasons in Major League Baseball for the Cleveland Indians. Feller pitched from 1936 to 1941 and from 1945 to 1956, interrupted by wartime service in the U.S. Navy. In a career spanning 570 games, Feller pitched 3,827 innings and posted a win–loss record of 266–162, with 279 complete games, 44 shutouts, and a 3.25 earned run average. He first played for the Indians aged 17 and was the first pitcher to win 24 games in a season before the age of 21. He threw no-hitters in 1940, 1946, and 1951 and also recorded 12 one-hitters; his no-hitters and one-hitters were records at the time of his retirement. He helped the Indians win a World Series title in 1948 and an American League-record 111 wins and the pennant in 1954. Feller led the American League in wins six times and in strikeouts seven times. In 1946, he recorded 348 strikeouts, a total not exceeded for 27 years. An eight-time All-Star, Feller was 36th on Sporting News's list of the 100 Greatest Baseball Players and was named the publication's "greatest pitcher of his time". He was a finalist for the Major League Baseball All-Century Team in 1999. ( Full article...)