How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
I like and agree with what Worldtraveller says.
Mmmmh?
Zack Holly Venturi 22:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Zack Holly Venturi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Yuser31415
(Editor review two!)
06:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I fixed the Lindenberg article. There was a missing heading from my translation of the German article (Chartplatzierungen - Place in the Charts). I've added an appropriate English heading and added a footnote for the D, A & CH headings (yes you got it right). Thanks for your interest. Ozdaren 22:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Zack Holly Venturi, We seem to have reached a misunderstanding at the Escher article page. I did not delete your (?) edit to the Alhambra. The only thing I deleted (and pasted on the discussion page for anyone to check out) was some (IMHO) weird reference to a rapper. Sorry if you were troubled, but I can assure you I didn't touch any ref. to the Alhambra - Escher's awe of said palace is well-documented. Regards, -- Technopat 00:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
It is a fact. You can see it in the official election results available from http://www.elecciones.mir.es/MIR/jsp/resultados/index.htm
You will notice that the number of votes cast is divided into "nulos" (void) and "válidos" (valid) votes, and that the latter are divided into "en blanco" (blank) and "a candidaturas" (to candidates).
If you insist on having a legal reference, check out http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo5-1985.t1.html#c6s14
Artículo Noventa y seis.
- Es nulo el voto emitido en sobre o papeleta diferente del modelo oficial, así como el emitido en papeleta sin sobre o en sobre que contenga más de una papeleta de distinta candidatura. En el supuesto de contener más de una papeleta de la misma candidatura, se computará como un solo voto válido.
- En el caso de elecciones al Congreso de los Diputados, al Parlamento Europeo, a los Ayuntamientos y a los Cabildos insulares serán también nulos los votos emitidos en papeletas en las que se hubiera modificado, añadido, señalado o tachado nombres de los candidatos comprendidos en ella o alterado su orden de colocación, así como aquellas en las que se hubiera producido cualquier otro tipo de alteración.
- En el caso de elecciones al Senado serán nulos los votos emitidos en papeletas en las que se hubieran señalado más de tres nombres en las circunscripciones provinciales, de dos en las circunscripciones insulares de Gran Canaria, Mallorca y Tenerife y en las poblaciones de Ceuta y Melilla, y de uno en el resto de las circunscripciones insulares.
- Asimismo serán nulos los votos contenidos en sobre en los que se hubiera producido cualquier tipo de alteración de las señaladas en los párrafos anteriores.
- Se considera voto en blanco, pero válido, el sobre que no contenga papeleta y, además, en las elecciones para el Senado, las papeletas que no contengan indicación a favor de ninguno de los candidatos.
Your information is quite complete. I realize this business in Spain is more or less the same as everywhere else.
It's very kind of you, --
Zack Holly Venturi (
talk)
21:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I just saw that you wrote me on the talk page of Egypt. I did not see that i am sorry. No the meaning of what i wrote in my profile is the following: - My mother tongue is Egyptian Colloquial Arabic, but since the Arab wikipedia is in Standard Arabic, i cannot contribute much and i will have a hard time translating things. What i speak less than natively is the Standard Arabic, and this is because i did not finish grade school in Egypt, but moved to Europe with my family. Denmark, so thats why my danish skills is better than my Standard Arabic skills. i hope you understand now... take care :D Hamid-Masri ( talk) 15:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you please explain this? These kinds of edits might be considered vandalism, with all the given consequences. If you do not agree with the article layout or content, please discuss it on the related talk page instead. Thanks. -- Angelo ( talk) 09:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm concerned about this edit. I see nothing wrong with changing Roma to Romani, though Roma is the term most commonly used in English. What is disturbing is that, in addition to those changes, you made a series of edits that appear to be vandalism. Changing POW to POV is the most glaring, but what appears to be the deliberate misspelling of words is also unsettling. Can you explain perhaps? -- A ni Mate 16:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey!
Thought I'd come here and warn you before I stole your Lincoln pic and quote. HAHA.
Ok, I kid. But if it's all right with you, could I copy it to my user page? I won't tamper with the original. Just a friendly question and won't be done without your approval. Cheers! Wikifan12345 ( talk) 07:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Zack, I was wondering what you think should be done with the Romano-Germanic culture article as far as what you think could be added to it. Also there are some issues with the Latin Europe article and thought maybe you could take a look at it. Do you have any clue on how much latin made its way into the Slovenian languge? Take care. -- Lucius Sempronius Turpio ( talk) 10:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in being involved in a Romano-Germanic culture portal? Let me know. -- Lucius Sempronius Turpio ( talk) 04:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
On the discussion page for Umm Kulthum you mention spelling variations that google produced for "ام كلثوم". I was just wondering how you managed to get this information from google.
Thanks in advance for the information.
codectified ( talk) 02:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Are you able to verify the current image of Philip Carteret? This one is previously unknown to me I would like to find out more about it. Thanks - Imbwiki ( talk) 11:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Zack, I've seen you are very good at languages especially in Spanish (my mother tongue). If you have some time, would you like to help me out with a text I'm working on (it's in English) for a small documentary?
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xonny88 ( talk • contribs) 03:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Zack, I see your're an aficionado of languages. The Latin Europe desastre really needs a makeover, and your suggestion to kick off the revolution is perfect. Well its time to light the fireworks and you're the man to do it, just by changing the opening along the lines you suggested. Be BOLD! Provocateur ( talk) 00:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
How to use talk pages: (guidelines from Template:User talk top)
I like and agree with what Worldtraveller says.
Mmmmh?
Zack Holly Venturi 22:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Zack Holly Venturi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
Yuser31415
(Editor review two!)
06:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I fixed the Lindenberg article. There was a missing heading from my translation of the German article (Chartplatzierungen - Place in the Charts). I've added an appropriate English heading and added a footnote for the D, A & CH headings (yes you got it right). Thanks for your interest. Ozdaren 22:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Greetings Zack Holly Venturi, We seem to have reached a misunderstanding at the Escher article page. I did not delete your (?) edit to the Alhambra. The only thing I deleted (and pasted on the discussion page for anyone to check out) was some (IMHO) weird reference to a rapper. Sorry if you were troubled, but I can assure you I didn't touch any ref. to the Alhambra - Escher's awe of said palace is well-documented. Regards, -- Technopat 00:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
It is a fact. You can see it in the official election results available from http://www.elecciones.mir.es/MIR/jsp/resultados/index.htm
You will notice that the number of votes cast is divided into "nulos" (void) and "válidos" (valid) votes, and that the latter are divided into "en blanco" (blank) and "a candidaturas" (to candidates).
If you insist on having a legal reference, check out http://noticias.juridicas.com/base_datos/Admin/lo5-1985.t1.html#c6s14
Artículo Noventa y seis.
- Es nulo el voto emitido en sobre o papeleta diferente del modelo oficial, así como el emitido en papeleta sin sobre o en sobre que contenga más de una papeleta de distinta candidatura. En el supuesto de contener más de una papeleta de la misma candidatura, se computará como un solo voto válido.
- En el caso de elecciones al Congreso de los Diputados, al Parlamento Europeo, a los Ayuntamientos y a los Cabildos insulares serán también nulos los votos emitidos en papeletas en las que se hubiera modificado, añadido, señalado o tachado nombres de los candidatos comprendidos en ella o alterado su orden de colocación, así como aquellas en las que se hubiera producido cualquier otro tipo de alteración.
- En el caso de elecciones al Senado serán nulos los votos emitidos en papeletas en las que se hubieran señalado más de tres nombres en las circunscripciones provinciales, de dos en las circunscripciones insulares de Gran Canaria, Mallorca y Tenerife y en las poblaciones de Ceuta y Melilla, y de uno en el resto de las circunscripciones insulares.
- Asimismo serán nulos los votos contenidos en sobre en los que se hubiera producido cualquier tipo de alteración de las señaladas en los párrafos anteriores.
- Se considera voto en blanco, pero válido, el sobre que no contenga papeleta y, además, en las elecciones para el Senado, las papeletas que no contengan indicación a favor de ninguno de los candidatos.
Your information is quite complete. I realize this business in Spain is more or less the same as everywhere else.
It's very kind of you, --
Zack Holly Venturi (
talk)
21:24, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I just saw that you wrote me on the talk page of Egypt. I did not see that i am sorry. No the meaning of what i wrote in my profile is the following: - My mother tongue is Egyptian Colloquial Arabic, but since the Arab wikipedia is in Standard Arabic, i cannot contribute much and i will have a hard time translating things. What i speak less than natively is the Standard Arabic, and this is because i did not finish grade school in Egypt, but moved to Europe with my family. Denmark, so thats why my danish skills is better than my Standard Arabic skills. i hope you understand now... take care :D Hamid-Masri ( talk) 15:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you please explain this? These kinds of edits might be considered vandalism, with all the given consequences. If you do not agree with the article layout or content, please discuss it on the related talk page instead. Thanks. -- Angelo ( talk) 09:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm concerned about this edit. I see nothing wrong with changing Roma to Romani, though Roma is the term most commonly used in English. What is disturbing is that, in addition to those changes, you made a series of edits that appear to be vandalism. Changing POW to POV is the most glaring, but what appears to be the deliberate misspelling of words is also unsettling. Can you explain perhaps? -- A ni Mate 16:34, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey!
Thought I'd come here and warn you before I stole your Lincoln pic and quote. HAHA.
Ok, I kid. But if it's all right with you, could I copy it to my user page? I won't tamper with the original. Just a friendly question and won't be done without your approval. Cheers! Wikifan12345 ( talk) 07:44, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi Zack, I was wondering what you think should be done with the Romano-Germanic culture article as far as what you think could be added to it. Also there are some issues with the Latin Europe article and thought maybe you could take a look at it. Do you have any clue on how much latin made its way into the Slovenian languge? Take care. -- Lucius Sempronius Turpio ( talk) 10:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Would you be interested in being involved in a Romano-Germanic culture portal? Let me know. -- Lucius Sempronius Turpio ( talk) 04:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
On the discussion page for Umm Kulthum you mention spelling variations that google produced for "ام كلثوم". I was just wondering how you managed to get this information from google.
Thanks in advance for the information.
codectified ( talk) 02:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. Are you able to verify the current image of Philip Carteret? This one is previously unknown to me I would like to find out more about it. Thanks - Imbwiki ( talk) 11:34, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Zack, I've seen you are very good at languages especially in Spanish (my mother tongue). If you have some time, would you like to help me out with a text I'm working on (it's in English) for a small documentary?
Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xonny88 ( talk • contribs) 03:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
Zack, I see your're an aficionado of languages. The Latin Europe desastre really needs a makeover, and your suggestion to kick off the revolution is perfect. Well its time to light the fireworks and you're the man to do it, just by changing the opening along the lines you suggested. Be BOLD! Provocateur ( talk) 00:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)