![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pathway Family Center, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathway Family Center. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orlady ( talk) 18:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I have reviewed you (and asked a question) here, just to make you aware.
By the way, of you do fancy being an admin, I will happily nominate you when the time is right. -- Athe Weatherman 18:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello to WikiProject Oregon folks, and get ready for another Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on the land fraud scandal and Mr. Wicks. This week we have one by request, Central Oregon, and a gnomish task, the Great Infobox Drive of '09. For the infobox drive, just find some articles without infoboxes and add one. People and companies are two prime areas as many do not have infoboxes, yet infoboxes exist for those areas. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies ( talk) 07:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I just have to say thanks. Those pictures and other info you added are great! I think we could nominate it at WP:GA very soon. Sincerely, LITTLE MOUNTAIN 5 20:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
A very interesting and informative article on the Table Rocks; nicely done!. However, you may want to reconsider the bit about "caves". Caves are natually occuring geologic features, yet the article identifies former mine works as "caves". Cheers, Rico402 ( talk) 05:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Just a quickee, when you put Upper and Lower Table Rock up for reassessment, did you mean to put it in the 'A class' section? It's fine if you did, because I think it meets the requirements, but maybe WP:GAN or WP:FAC would be a better, faster place. Thanks, Little Mountain Public 01:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pathway Family Center, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pathway Family Center. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Orlady ( talk) 18:30, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I have reviewed you (and asked a question) here, just to make you aware.
By the way, of you do fancy being an admin, I will happily nominate you when the time is right. -- Athe Weatherman 18:27, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello to WikiProject Oregon folks, and get ready for another Collaboration Of The Week. Thank you to those who worked on the land fraud scandal and Mr. Wicks. This week we have one by request, Central Oregon, and a gnomish task, the Great Infobox Drive of '09. For the infobox drive, just find some articles without infoboxes and add one. People and companies are two prime areas as many do not have infoboxes, yet infoboxes exist for those areas. Again, click here to opt out of these messages, or click here to make a suggestion for a future COTW. Aboutmovies ( talk) 07:46, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I just have to say thanks. Those pictures and other info you added are great! I think we could nominate it at WP:GA very soon. Sincerely, LITTLE MOUNTAIN 5 20:55, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
A very interesting and informative article on the Table Rocks; nicely done!. However, you may want to reconsider the bit about "caves". Caves are natually occuring geologic features, yet the article identifies former mine works as "caves". Cheers, Rico402 ( talk) 05:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Just a quickee, when you put Upper and Lower Table Rock up for reassessment, did you mean to put it in the 'A class' section? It's fine if you did, because I think it meets the requirements, but maybe WP:GAN or WP:FAC would be a better, faster place. Thanks, Little Mountain Public 01:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)