This is Yoshi24517's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Yoshi24517 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Please note: I live on the West Coast of the United States. I may not see your message due to time zones. In which case, I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks!
Current time at my location: 8:45 am, June 5, 2024
PDT [
refresh
Please remember to stay civil when contacting me, otherwise your message may be ignored and reverted. As a gentle reminder to experienced editors contacting me, please remember WP:DTTR. I know about the opposite part of this essay, but as such, I prefer to not be templated. Thanks.
All sections are automatically archived by a bot ( Lowercase sigmabot III) automatically after 7 days of inactivity.
Current Status: Very Busy
-Status updated as of Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 15:45 UTC.
Click
here to find out what each status means.
Click
here to purge this page to update this page.
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia and english isn't my first language so I hope I'm doing this right, sorry if this is meant to be in the article talk page instead, I didn't want to start an edit war. Snuff films are alleged according to the article itself, as the lead concludes with "According to the fact-checking website Snopes, there has never been a verified example of a genuine commercially produced snuff film. Videos of actual murders (such as beheading videos) have been made available to the public, generally through the Internet; however, those videos have been made and broadcast by the murderers either for their own gratification or for propaganda purposes, and not for financial gain and thus do not qualify, by definition, as a 'snuff film'." It is also stated in more detail that snuff films are not known to exist in the "Reality" section of the article.
If you like I can keep the word "alleged" out of it but was the rest of my edit (making it clearer that they are explicitly made and sold for profit, and removing the arguably redundant statement that they are often graphic) okay and I can revert it or do you think it was better before? Up to you, you don't have to give a reason.
Thank you. Sorry if I did this wrong. -unsigned comment by IP 2A02:C7E:3188:4C00:3982:B0EF:78AA:B84C
I need help trying to change an artist wikipedia image, I have the images and release form from the photographer -- Digitallyme42 ( talk) 17:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
This is Yoshi24517's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11Auto-archiving period: 7 days |
Yoshi24517 is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Please note: I live on the West Coast of the United States. I may not see your message due to time zones. In which case, I will respond as soon as I can. Thanks!
Current time at my location: 8:45 am, June 5, 2024
PDT [
refresh
Please remember to stay civil when contacting me, otherwise your message may be ignored and reverted. As a gentle reminder to experienced editors contacting me, please remember WP:DTTR. I know about the opposite part of this essay, but as such, I prefer to not be templated. Thanks.
All sections are automatically archived by a bot ( Lowercase sigmabot III) automatically after 7 days of inactivity.
Current Status: Very Busy
-Status updated as of Wednesday, June 5, 2024 at 15:45 UTC.
Click
here to find out what each status means.
Click
here to purge this page to update this page.
Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia and english isn't my first language so I hope I'm doing this right, sorry if this is meant to be in the article talk page instead, I didn't want to start an edit war. Snuff films are alleged according to the article itself, as the lead concludes with "According to the fact-checking website Snopes, there has never been a verified example of a genuine commercially produced snuff film. Videos of actual murders (such as beheading videos) have been made available to the public, generally through the Internet; however, those videos have been made and broadcast by the murderers either for their own gratification or for propaganda purposes, and not for financial gain and thus do not qualify, by definition, as a 'snuff film'." It is also stated in more detail that snuff films are not known to exist in the "Reality" section of the article.
If you like I can keep the word "alleged" out of it but was the rest of my edit (making it clearer that they are explicitly made and sold for profit, and removing the arguably redundant statement that they are often graphic) okay and I can revert it or do you think it was better before? Up to you, you don't have to give a reason.
Thank you. Sorry if I did this wrong. -unsigned comment by IP 2A02:C7E:3188:4C00:3982:B0EF:78AA:B84C
I need help trying to change an artist wikipedia image, I have the images and release form from the photographer -- Digitallyme42 ( talk) 17:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)