Hi Yinonk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 01:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC) |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sionk ( talk) 12:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)The article Ruth Fine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle 10:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Fine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Fine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 11:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nation-E, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BMS and Saft ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EarlySense, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Nation-E.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Yinonk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avner Halperin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Startup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Push Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Two very weak sources containing mostly quotations of direct speech by the foundation's organiser. Ghits are few and are only fuund raising sites and social media. Fails WP:ORG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 08:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
On EN WP we require disclosed of paid editing. Wondering if you can do this for us. Thanks. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Further issues
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 14:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Here it is again You need to list: (1) All the articles you were paid for in any form (2) Who paid for the articles in question (3) What companies and intermediaries were used during those transactions Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 06:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Theil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Theil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Can go below here Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Edits:
Yinonk ( talk) 16:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I do see you disclosed somewhat better here [5] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 07:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Yinonk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
User:Doc James blocked me because I didn't disclose the fact that some of my edits in En Wiki is commercial. I have no problem to do that, I have full discloser in Heb Wiki for years now: [6], I didn't know I have the same obligation here too. And so I did everything he asked me to do, here: [7]. and here: [8]. But he still would not unblock me, without any obvious reason and with no explanation. Hope you can help. Thanks. Yinonk ( talk) 13:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Based on a review of your editing here and the discussions below, I do not see how unblocking you is in Wikipedia's best interests. Yunshui 雲 水 13:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yinonk - you are required to disclose any paid editing, be it page creation updating a page, requesting a page be deleted or even making a request on a talkpage that someone else updates it. Anything you are compensated for needs disclosure.
You will need to convince us that you have sufficient understanding of the policies on paid editing conflict of interest and neutrality before an unblock request is likely to be considered. If you can't explain how you plan to edit within these policies then your unblock request is unlikely to be considered by any administrator. Amortias ( T)( C) 09:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rimon Winery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rimon Winery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
The article European Society for Trauma and Dissociation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent reliable sources concerning this org have been offered to establish notability. See WP:42
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ☆
Bri (
talk) 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=EarlySense&type=revision&diff=668095686&oldid=668090606
from
Thanks for uploading File:European Society for Trauma and Dissociation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Someone is trying to hire people to remove tags about paid editing from articles you have created. Hum Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Yinonk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's been nearly a year now. I've disclosed everything. Thanks
Decline reason:
Oh, and looking back on this again, your snide personal attack on Doc James just above this section, does not inspire me to give you the benefit of any doubt - I think any further unblock request would need to include, at a very minimum, a convincing apology for that. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for uploading File:Rimon Winery Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Yinonk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 01:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC) |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Sionk ( talk) 12:30, 6 November 2012 (UTC)The article Ruth Fine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Fiddle
Faddle 10:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Fine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Fine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 11:15, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nation-E, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BMS and Saft ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EarlySense, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heartbeat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Nation-E.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Yinonk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Avner Halperin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Startup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
The article Push Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Two very weak sources containing mostly quotations of direct speech by the foundation's organiser. Ghits are few and are only fuund raising sites and social media. Fails WP:ORG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (
talk) 08:48, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
On EN WP we require disclosed of paid editing. Wondering if you can do this for us. Thanks. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 14:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Further issues
Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Doc James (
talk ·
contribs ·
email) 14:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)Here it is again You need to list: (1) All the articles you were paid for in any form (2) Who paid for the articles in question (3) What companies and intermediaries were used during those transactions Best Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 06:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Theil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Theil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Can go below here Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Edits:
Yinonk ( talk) 16:24, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I do see you disclosed somewhat better here [5] Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 07:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Yinonk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
User:Doc James blocked me because I didn't disclose the fact that some of my edits in En Wiki is commercial. I have no problem to do that, I have full discloser in Heb Wiki for years now: [6], I didn't know I have the same obligation here too. And so I did everything he asked me to do, here: [7]. and here: [8]. But he still would not unblock me, without any obvious reason and with no explanation. Hope you can help. Thanks. Yinonk ( talk) 13:51, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Based on a review of your editing here and the discussions below, I do not see how unblocking you is in Wikipedia's best interests. Yunshui 雲 水 13:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Yinonk - you are required to disclose any paid editing, be it page creation updating a page, requesting a page be deleted or even making a request on a talkpage that someone else updates it. Anything you are compensated for needs disclosure.
You will need to convince us that you have sufficient understanding of the policies on paid editing conflict of interest and neutrality before an unblock request is likely to be considered. If you can't explain how you plan to edit within these policies then your unblock request is unlikely to be considered by any administrator. Amortias ( T)( C) 09:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rimon Winery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rimon Winery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 15:05, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
The article European Society for Trauma and Dissociation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent reliable sources concerning this org have been offered to establish notability. See WP:42
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ☆
Bri (
talk) 18:11, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 00:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=EarlySense&type=revision&diff=668095686&oldid=668090606
from
Thanks for uploading File:European Society for Trauma and Dissociation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
Someone is trying to hire people to remove tags about paid editing from articles you have created. Hum Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 16:55, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Yinonk ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
It's been nearly a year now. I've disclosed everything. Thanks
Decline reason:
Oh, and looking back on this again, your snide personal attack on Doc James just above this section, does not inspire me to give you the benefit of any doubt - I think any further unblock request would need to include, at a very minimum, a convincing apology for that. Boing! said Zebedee ( talk) 16:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks for uploading File:Rimon Winery Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 03:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)