![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please accept my sincere apoligies. I meant to block a vandal, not you. If this effects any of your editing, please contact me ASAP. Bearian ( talk) 16:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
well the pornography section was more of an editorial where the person wrote that "white women are disgusted by thier male counterparts" I don't think thats been proven anywhere. This is why I agreed that it should be deleted. Maybe you can find me some reputable documentation saying otherwise. Im not going to find info disproving something so stupid and immature. it is not as the other user pointed out encyclopedic by any means. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informatron ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello - I do not understand the issue of context on this article which got deleted. What I wrote defined what it was, and I have seen many cases of similar fictional items having a page of their own. Please can you enlighten me on this issue.
Thanks. Talking Skull ( talk) 16:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, I thought Idi Amin Dada was a pron star. But he obviously isn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samthemaniloveut ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC) |
KnightLago ( talk) 03:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I am supried and honestly failry offended over the revoking of my recent, much needed edits to the College of Wooster article. All of the information is valid eventhough it seems odd. The school is currently under new a new administration and has made sigificant changes. I am a student at the college and have this information first hand, unabridged. I would appreciate both the return of my edits and a thurough apology. Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanvanrunkle ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
You know what? You're right about the spelling, and I apologize for that. Your few edits with this account, unfortunately, are as problematic as were the last ones, and I intend to report this account as an abusive sockpuppet. Please consider editing constructively. Xymmax ( talk) 01:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please accept my sincere apoligies. I meant to block a vandal, not you. If this effects any of your editing, please contact me ASAP. Bearian ( talk) 16:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
well the pornography section was more of an editorial where the person wrote that "white women are disgusted by thier male counterparts" I don't think thats been proven anywhere. This is why I agreed that it should be deleted. Maybe you can find me some reputable documentation saying otherwise. Im not going to find info disproving something so stupid and immature. it is not as the other user pointed out encyclopedic by any means. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informatron ( talk • contribs) 22:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello - I do not understand the issue of context on this article which got deleted. What I wrote defined what it was, and I have seen many cases of similar fictional items having a page of their own. Please can you enlighten me on this issue.
Thanks. Talking Skull ( talk) 16:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, I thought Idi Amin Dada was a pron star. But he obviously isn't. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samthemaniloveut ( talk • contribs) 02:13, 23 March 2008 (UTC) |
KnightLago ( talk) 03:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
I am supried and honestly failry offended over the revoking of my recent, much needed edits to the College of Wooster article. All of the information is valid eventhough it seems odd. The school is currently under new a new administration and has made sigificant changes. I am a student at the college and have this information first hand, unabridged. I would appreciate both the return of my edits and a thurough apology. Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alanvanrunkle ( talk • contribs) 15:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
You know what? You're right about the spelling, and I apologize for that. Your few edits with this account, unfortunately, are as problematic as were the last ones, and I intend to report this account as an abusive sockpuppet. Please consider editing constructively. Xymmax ( talk) 01:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)