|
==Speedy deletion of Aureation==
A tag has been placed on Aureation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Jeanenawhitney (
talk)
18:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Your edit shows up when I look at the article, so no worries. Though, to be honest, I am not completely certain what you are trying to say. It is a good reference, so why not use a direct quote? Let me know if I can be of assistance. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 21:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Greville Starkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Intelligentsium ( talk) 21:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Remember that " names of list categories should be plural". -- McGeddon ( talk) 15:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you commented out these links?
I believe commenting out or removing dead links is counter-policy, when the link provides enough information for the dedicated reader to find a paper copy. Geo Swan ( talk) 04:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I took a look at your contribution history, to try to see how many other articles you were removing links from. I found a at least one other in the last week.
I also notice you prodded Green Tortoise. I explained why I removed that prod.
Did you check Talk:Green Tortoise first? If so, what did you think of the keep arguments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Tortoise? Geo Swan ( talk) 13:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AFactitious_disorder&diff=314623728&oldid=309328698 Geo Swan ( talk) 23:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
You removed a bunch of references in these edit.
You inserted a comment into the body of the article that said: "this link does not support that Behlendorf founded Hyperreal[http://hyperreal.org/ Hyperreal]" Finding the appropriate subpage was trivial. Please click on this google search for "Brian Behlendorf" site:http://hyperreal.org/ founded OR founder
Similarly it was trivial to search for the subpages that describe his role in founding sfraves "Brian Behlendorf" site:http://sfraves.org/ founder OR founding And it was trivial to search for the subpages that describe his role as a director of Mozilla: "Brian Behlendorf" site:mozilla.org/ director OR directors
If you plan to continue working on checking the references to article I strongly urge you to learn to use these simple techniques. Geo Swan ( talk) 00:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was a little bit confused by your post on the discussion on the Signpost. I was the one who made the statement that the promotion rate "remains more or less constant (c. 55%)" – not Tony – and it seems like you and I are in agreement. I argued that the constant promotion rate shows that since the promotions have gone down, the nominations have as well, and I think that was your point too?
I just thought I'd ask you about this here instead of having a long discussion there, if it's just a misunderstanding. Lampman ( talk) 16:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
KnightLago (
talk)
03:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Xme ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why am I blocked? And all the articles I created are removed from my user page? I haven't even been editing. Please unblock me. This must be a mistake. Please point out harmful or vandal edits I made. Please show me the mistakes and I will fix. Please review and put back the articles. Thanks.
Decline reason:
CU verifies abusing multiple accounts. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
|
==Speedy deletion of Aureation==
A tag has been placed on Aureation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
Jeanenawhitney (
talk)
18:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Your edit shows up when I look at the article, so no worries. Though, to be honest, I am not completely certain what you are trying to say. It is a good reference, so why not use a direct quote? Let me know if I can be of assistance. --- RepublicanJacobite The'FortyFive' 21:51, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Greville Starkey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Intelligentsium ( talk) 21:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Remember that " names of list categories should be plural". -- McGeddon ( talk) 15:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you commented out these links?
I believe commenting out or removing dead links is counter-policy, when the link provides enough information for the dedicated reader to find a paper copy. Geo Swan ( talk) 04:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
I took a look at your contribution history, to try to see how many other articles you were removing links from. I found a at least one other in the last week.
I also notice you prodded Green Tortoise. I explained why I removed that prod.
Did you check Talk:Green Tortoise first? If so, what did you think of the keep arguments in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Tortoise? Geo Swan ( talk) 13:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AFactitious_disorder&diff=314623728&oldid=309328698 Geo Swan ( talk) 23:50, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
You removed a bunch of references in these edit.
You inserted a comment into the body of the article that said: "this link does not support that Behlendorf founded Hyperreal[http://hyperreal.org/ Hyperreal]" Finding the appropriate subpage was trivial. Please click on this google search for "Brian Behlendorf" site:http://hyperreal.org/ founded OR founder
Similarly it was trivial to search for the subpages that describe his role in founding sfraves "Brian Behlendorf" site:http://sfraves.org/ founder OR founding And it was trivial to search for the subpages that describe his role as a director of Mozilla: "Brian Behlendorf" site:mozilla.org/ director OR directors
If you plan to continue working on checking the references to article I strongly urge you to learn to use these simple techniques. Geo Swan ( talk) 00:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I was a little bit confused by your post on the discussion on the Signpost. I was the one who made the statement that the promotion rate "remains more or less constant (c. 55%)" – not Tony – and it seems like you and I are in agreement. I argued that the constant promotion rate shows that since the promotions have gone down, the nominations have as well, and I think that was your point too?
I just thought I'd ask you about this here instead of having a long discussion there, if it's just a misunderstanding. Lampman ( talk) 16:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
KnightLago (
talk)
03:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)Xme ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why am I blocked? And all the articles I created are removed from my user page? I haven't even been editing. Please unblock me. This must be a mistake. Please point out harmful or vandal edits I made. Please show me the mistakes and I will fix. Please review and put back the articles. Thanks.
Decline reason:
CU verifies abusing multiple accounts. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.