I'm tired of discussing with the wikipedia inquisition and decided to abandon my old account and reincarnate.
After having received a topic-ban after, I must admit, some less diplomatic actions of mine for reason of citing several unwelcome parts of the 9/11 Commission's webpages into the appropriate wikipedia articles, while respecting all the Wikipedia guidelines of NPOV, RS etc. -- which turned out to be deemed a crime by the pro-Illuminati admin elite, I was now banned fully because of suspected socking by some account called Kaaskop666 which is not mine. I give up the arguing, but will --under protest-- keep respecting my topic ban, which says more about the failure of wikipedia to be open and fair [1], then it does about me.
Readers and editors beware. Cognitive dissonance creates warped minds, and makes wikipedia a dangerous place to get information and a time-consuming place to contribute information.
Xiutwel-0002 ( talk) 11:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Xiutwel-0002. You seem to be a reincarnation of Xiutwel, who is indefinitely blocked. You should not be editing here using a new account. If you wish, you can respond to the above thread at WP:ANI. EdJohnston ( talk) 17:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
17:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)I am sorry, I only adhere to rule nr. 1: ignore all rules, and let wikipedia be a great place of knowledge. Xiutwel-0002 ( talk) 17:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm tired of discussing with the wikipedia inquisition and decided to abandon my old account and reincarnate.
After having received a topic-ban after, I must admit, some less diplomatic actions of mine for reason of citing several unwelcome parts of the 9/11 Commission's webpages into the appropriate wikipedia articles, while respecting all the Wikipedia guidelines of NPOV, RS etc. -- which turned out to be deemed a crime by the pro-Illuminati admin elite, I was now banned fully because of suspected socking by some account called Kaaskop666 which is not mine. I give up the arguing, but will --under protest-- keep respecting my topic ban, which says more about the failure of wikipedia to be open and fair [1], then it does about me.
Readers and editors beware. Cognitive dissonance creates warped minds, and makes wikipedia a dangerous place to get information and a time-consuming place to contribute information.
Xiutwel-0002 ( talk) 11:44, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello Xiutwel-0002. You seem to be a reincarnation of Xiutwel, who is indefinitely blocked. You should not be editing here using a new account. If you wish, you can respond to the above thread at WP:ANI. EdJohnston ( talk) 17:05, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
TN
X
Man
17:45, 8 February 2010 (UTC)I am sorry, I only adhere to rule nr. 1: ignore all rules, and let wikipedia be a great place of knowledge. Xiutwel-0002 ( talk) 17:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC)