It has come to my attention that you have recommended the article "Bookzek" for speedy deletion. I, as the creator of this article, have spent a good deal of my time on this, and so wouls like to prevent my work from being destroyed. I understand that it can be fixed. I would be much obliged if you could provide me with the required information I need to fix it, relating to exactly what the problem is, and what I have to do to fix it.
Thank you very much, Systemdweller —Preceding unsigned comment added by Systemdweller ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I would very much like to userfy my article, and I will endevour to make it notable also.
~~Systemdweller~~ —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Systemdweller (
talk •
contribs)
20:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Ah, I seem to be unable to move the article, as it has already been deleted. I find this quite infuriating, as I spent quite a lot of time on the article. Most irritating.
~~systemdweller~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Systemdweller ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
My citation is properly referenced. The reference is a You Tube clip of Tom Hanks. I am an licensed attorney practicing in southern CA and I am very familiar with libel laws and free speech rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.20.150 ( talk) 16:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm a little confused why that last comment appeared. I haven't wrote any page son Tom Hanks, Youtube or Tom Hanks. Would anyone like to enlighten me?
Systemdweller (
talk)
22:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
How are my links inappropriate? I posted a link that is relevant to the subject.
I am new to this wikipedia thing, so i am not very familiar with discussing. I just looked at this wp:elno page, and I do see the mention about blogs. The blog that I am linking to is simply a compilation of headline news articles and peer-reviewed articles that are relevant to the subject matter. I do not see the problem.
I will be taking part in the Great Wikipedia Dramaout from midnight July 18th and the following five days. Please do not bring drama to my talk page, as I will be ignoring it. Thank you.
Yes I did mention you having inhospitable behavior for the simple reason you guys do not give enough explination which is needed for a new person like me to understand.
I checked out the page on wikipedia about notability and I though I had seen the word interesting used in there. I don't see it there anymore so I guess I was mistaken...
Additionaly I would still like to know how I was promoting such videos and game software while other similar pages were not.
When i mentioned saving the world is was kinda joking... I tend to do that(although if you recall, I did denote that fact with another sentence.) As for the ninja bit... The videos on youtube refer to him as being a Ninja... and remember, at that time had I believed notability to be "something Interesting".
Lastly, could you kindly explain what the underconstruction icon is used for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PillsburyDoughMan97 ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, to use the author's speak: I tagged it before someone else could. ;) De728631 ( talk) 19:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Does it have any screen caps? Drjuki ( talk) 19:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Well done on spotting the attack part of the page. I got as far as "Zozo Genchev works at Abbey College" and lost the will to live. -- role player 23:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I happened to check in regarding another matter when I got your message. To me, the article is worth a prod tag. If the islands are 100% Seventh-Day Adventist, it simply doesn't make sense. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 03:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I decided to list the article at AfD because there isn't really any content that could be merged. See the AfD entry here. Jafeluv ( talk) 08:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't think you understand. I said the forum calls itself the biggest dance forum in the world, I then cited this by pointing you to the website stating "the biggest dance forum." Then i said this is statistically not true, I then sourced this by showing you a site which proved other dance forums have more traffic. I Sourced this correctly, i think you are being lazy and not checking yourself. So I will be re adding this back. You can't tell me these are unreliable sources as you guys use Alexa yourselves.
How long will it take for the afd take to remove? its been longer than 7 days —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayflux ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok one more question, how do you cite the same source twice? Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayflux ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
When will the debate over deletion end? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
How do i go about making an article semi-protected? The second this article becomes public i am sure it will be come vandalised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 13:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
We are not in todays log for deletion, does this mean the debate is over? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
and what does that mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 23:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 22:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't see how this is not grammatically correct, care to explain?
"... many of their prisoners perished because of harsh conditions or were executed."
It makes perfect sense to me as: "many of their prisoners #1[perished because of harsh conditions] or #2[were executed]"
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:
Again, thank you for making this event a success! -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 02:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Maybe I overreacted a bit. But it's a significant problem because (1) it's in the lead and (2) the correct spelling of HyperText Markup Language is a fact that any computer-literate person is or should be aware of, and (3) it was there for six weeks. The fact it stayed in there that long means that no one (as in an experienced Web designer like myself) is watching the article for obvious vandalism, which is why the HTML article is slowly degenerating into mush like a melting snowman. No one could seriously argue that "mark-up" is a legitimate spelling of "markup" when no one has spelled it with a hyphen for over 50 years (I should know, one of my long-stalled personal projects is my book on the history of hypertext). The spelling can be easily checked in one minute on Google. The only reasonable inference is that the anon IP who inserted the hyphen was a vandal doing it as a prank or in bad faith---or a very young child under the age of 8.
The reason I overreacted is that this is a symptom of a major problem with Wikipedia, that we keep getting hit with subtle vandalism on a daily basis, not only in minor obscure articles, but in important articles, on key facts that any person knowledgeable in that specific field should already know or can easily check. And no one does anything about it for months, which is how we end up with scandals like what happened with John Seigenthaler.
So Wikipedia is full of garbage. Which is why no one takes Wikipedia seriously. Which is why I and many other editors are scaling back our involvement out of sheer frustration because no one gives a damn and no one knows how to fix the project. That's why the only major contributions I still make nowadays are photographs, because it's just too damn time-consuming to defend my favorite articles against all these crazy vandals. -- Coolcaesar ( talk) 03:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
for repairing the vandalism on my talk page. ttonyb1 ( talk) 18:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to note your good work in trying to help the creator of this article; you definitely assumed good faith and tried to help, but I came across the article in the course of assessing another article for speedy deletion and I have to say that I cannot imagine that the article will ever be able to provide any reliable sources that demonstrate any notability. I did a brief search and found nothing whatever that gave me any confidence that the individuals have anything other than a YouTube account and a desire for self-promotion. Nevertheless, you were doing things the way that I would like to do them myself on my better days, and I thought it deserved to be recognized. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crayon) History section. Contains Grafitti, cannot edit out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msisshinryu ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Wperdue, we haven't worked together before. I am ikip, an editor of 4 years here.
Would you considering userfying the article which you put up for deletion? The will delete it from main space completely and move it to a subpage of the creators.
The editor is a new editor, and this will give the new user a chance to rework this article and maybe Wikipedia will get a long term dedicated editor
Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can userfy the article. Thanks for your time. Ikip ( talk) 06:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitami Woome (2nd nomination) FYI. Sigh, I really wanted to give the editor the benefit of the doubt. I had this nagging feeling that I shouldn't userfy, and I should have listened. Ikip ( talk) 10:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou for letting me know.-- Thisisthebestusernameever! ( talk) 22:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I cannot imagine you giving me the unprecidented short term of ten years to apologize. I am therefore blocking the offending account and will recoinsider its unblocking sometime in 2019. So there. :) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 22:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't see much improvement happening anytime soon at Luis Durani. Any thoughts? Drmies ( talk) 01:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
My argument is on the talk page. Hope it make sense I really can't believe you guys/gals have a problem with me removing a *contradiction* in the text where there aren't even *citations* to back up one of the viewpoints in that paragraph. It's this kind of nonsense that drove me into retirement from this place. Cheers, Neale —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.210.149 ( talk) 18:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
This is in reference to your proposed deletion of the above page, which was begun by a user now going by the monicker of kendwallace. This user has been starting or adding to many different pages concerning planned mullti-use developments in several parts of the U.S. for the past several months now. Check his log at Special:Contributions/Kendwallace. His edits are almost always incoherent and are based, for the most part on the Web sites of the developers. If you will check the history of Centennial, California, you will see how many times I have reverted his material and how many times he or she has put it back with no explanation. I frankly do not know what to do with Mr. or Ms. kendwallace. As for Tejon Mountain Village (which is in the immediate area where I live), I am developing my own article on that subject, which I will work on in User:GeorgeLouis/Sandbox and then provide it as a substitute for Tejon Mountain Village when the new version is ready. I have a dozen articles from the Bakersfield Californian which I will use as my source, as well as any good material I can find from the Tejon Ranch site and the Web pages of the Mountain Enterprise, our local weekly newspaper. I invite you to keep an eye on this article if you are interested in following up. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 21:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I am a proud jewish soldier in the IDF. Starbucks has been helping with the War on Terror. I ask you to please return my work to it's rightfully state. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
You are a good guy. Why don't I buy you a plane ticket so you can have a trip to Israel on the house?
I am staying in Michigan. I am on vaction from the Israeli Embassy. Where are you from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks and have a great time living in this great country. Thanks for the Fort Wayne Connect. Have a great day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Conjure Cognac. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conjure Cognac. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there are 3 citations (22, 53, 54) about testosterone/cortisol issues on diabetes, therefore I really think it is enough. Say me if you want more citations even if there are already 3 citations. Do not do edit war please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 09:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
You are vandal! The article are free, you told an evident lie. they are strongly sourced! You should read a book of endocrinolgy instead of making vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 17:44, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Your accusations have not good faith!!! Because you invent accusations and you remove citations! Before deleting scientific article increase your preparation instead than making vandalism. read books! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 03:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Now you know I'm not vandal and my edits were not wrong. I would suggest you to revert an edited page just when you well know the topic and just when you are sure that the edits are blatantly wrong. Best regards-- Testosterone vs diabetes ( talk) 20:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I've removed your personal offence to me in diabetes talk because I was bored to log me, moreover very often (even from my computer) I'm log out and I even do not know why-- Testosterone vs diabetes ( talk) 17:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Just an FYI re: your submission at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. I was looking over the page, and just realized that you were the third person to report User:Testosterone vs diabetes (I was the second person ... User:Nutriveg was the first). I'm going to merge my report into Nutriveg's report ... thought I would let you know, in case you wanted to do the same. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 19:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
It has come to my attention that you have recommended the article "Bookzek" for speedy deletion. I, as the creator of this article, have spent a good deal of my time on this, and so wouls like to prevent my work from being destroyed. I understand that it can be fixed. I would be much obliged if you could provide me with the required information I need to fix it, relating to exactly what the problem is, and what I have to do to fix it.
Thank you very much, Systemdweller —Preceding unsigned comment added by Systemdweller ( talk • contribs) 20:00, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
I would very much like to userfy my article, and I will endevour to make it notable also.
~~Systemdweller~~ —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Systemdweller (
talk •
contribs)
20:07, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Ah, I seem to be unable to move the article, as it has already been deleted. I find this quite infuriating, as I spent quite a lot of time on the article. Most irritating.
~~systemdweller~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Systemdweller ( talk • contribs) 20:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
My citation is properly referenced. The reference is a You Tube clip of Tom Hanks. I am an licensed attorney practicing in southern CA and I am very familiar with libel laws and free speech rights. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.107.20.150 ( talk) 16:16, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
I'm a little confused why that last comment appeared. I haven't wrote any page son Tom Hanks, Youtube or Tom Hanks. Would anyone like to enlighten me?
Systemdweller (
talk)
22:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
How are my links inappropriate? I posted a link that is relevant to the subject.
I am new to this wikipedia thing, so i am not very familiar with discussing. I just looked at this wp:elno page, and I do see the mention about blogs. The blog that I am linking to is simply a compilation of headline news articles and peer-reviewed articles that are relevant to the subject matter. I do not see the problem.
I will be taking part in the Great Wikipedia Dramaout from midnight July 18th and the following five days. Please do not bring drama to my talk page, as I will be ignoring it. Thank you.
Yes I did mention you having inhospitable behavior for the simple reason you guys do not give enough explination which is needed for a new person like me to understand.
I checked out the page on wikipedia about notability and I though I had seen the word interesting used in there. I don't see it there anymore so I guess I was mistaken...
Additionaly I would still like to know how I was promoting such videos and game software while other similar pages were not.
When i mentioned saving the world is was kinda joking... I tend to do that(although if you recall, I did denote that fact with another sentence.) As for the ninja bit... The videos on youtube refer to him as being a Ninja... and remember, at that time had I believed notability to be "something Interesting".
Lastly, could you kindly explain what the underconstruction icon is used for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PillsburyDoughMan97 ( talk • contribs) 14:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Well, to use the author's speak: I tagged it before someone else could. ;) De728631 ( talk) 19:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Does it have any screen caps? Drjuki ( talk) 19:22, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Well done on spotting the attack part of the page. I got as far as "Zozo Genchev works at Abbey College" and lost the will to live. -- role player 23:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
I happened to check in regarding another matter when I got your message. To me, the article is worth a prod tag. If the islands are 100% Seventh-Day Adventist, it simply doesn't make sense. -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 03:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I decided to list the article at AfD because there isn't really any content that could be merged. See the AfD entry here. Jafeluv ( talk) 08:51, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't think you understand. I said the forum calls itself the biggest dance forum in the world, I then cited this by pointing you to the website stating "the biggest dance forum." Then i said this is statistically not true, I then sourced this by showing you a site which proved other dance forums have more traffic. I Sourced this correctly, i think you are being lazy and not checking yourself. So I will be re adding this back. You can't tell me these are unreliable sources as you guys use Alexa yourselves.
How long will it take for the afd take to remove? its been longer than 7 days —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayflux ( talk • contribs) 21:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok one more question, how do you cite the same source twice? Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayflux ( talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
When will the debate over deletion end? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
How do i go about making an article semi-protected? The second this article becomes public i am sure it will be come vandalised. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 13:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
We are not in todays log for deletion, does this mean the debate is over? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 17:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
and what does that mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.64.15 ( talk) 23:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 22:05, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't see how this is not grammatically correct, care to explain?
"... many of their prisoners perished because of harsh conditions or were executed."
It makes perfect sense to me as: "many of their prisoners #1[perished because of harsh conditions] or #2[were executed]"
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:
Again, thank you for making this event a success! -- Jayron32. talk. say no to drama 02:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay. Maybe I overreacted a bit. But it's a significant problem because (1) it's in the lead and (2) the correct spelling of HyperText Markup Language is a fact that any computer-literate person is or should be aware of, and (3) it was there for six weeks. The fact it stayed in there that long means that no one (as in an experienced Web designer like myself) is watching the article for obvious vandalism, which is why the HTML article is slowly degenerating into mush like a melting snowman. No one could seriously argue that "mark-up" is a legitimate spelling of "markup" when no one has spelled it with a hyphen for over 50 years (I should know, one of my long-stalled personal projects is my book on the history of hypertext). The spelling can be easily checked in one minute on Google. The only reasonable inference is that the anon IP who inserted the hyphen was a vandal doing it as a prank or in bad faith---or a very young child under the age of 8.
The reason I overreacted is that this is a symptom of a major problem with Wikipedia, that we keep getting hit with subtle vandalism on a daily basis, not only in minor obscure articles, but in important articles, on key facts that any person knowledgeable in that specific field should already know or can easily check. And no one does anything about it for months, which is how we end up with scandals like what happened with John Seigenthaler.
So Wikipedia is full of garbage. Which is why no one takes Wikipedia seriously. Which is why I and many other editors are scaling back our involvement out of sheer frustration because no one gives a damn and no one knows how to fix the project. That's why the only major contributions I still make nowadays are photographs, because it's just too damn time-consuming to defend my favorite articles against all these crazy vandals. -- Coolcaesar ( talk) 03:04, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
for repairing the vandalism on my talk page. ttonyb1 ( talk) 18:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to note your good work in trying to help the creator of this article; you definitely assumed good faith and tried to help, but I came across the article in the course of assessing another article for speedy deletion and I have to say that I cannot imagine that the article will ever be able to provide any reliable sources that demonstrate any notability. I did a brief search and found nothing whatever that gave me any confidence that the individuals have anything other than a YouTube account and a desire for self-promotion. Nevertheless, you were doing things the way that I would like to do them myself on my better days, and I thought it deserved to be recognized. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crayon) History section. Contains Grafitti, cannot edit out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Msisshinryu ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello Wperdue, we haven't worked together before. I am ikip, an editor of 4 years here.
Would you considering userfying the article which you put up for deletion? The will delete it from main space completely and move it to a subpage of the creators.
The editor is a new editor, and this will give the new user a chance to rework this article and maybe Wikipedia will get a long term dedicated editor
Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can userfy the article. Thanks for your time. Ikip ( talk) 06:35, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitami Woome (2nd nomination) FYI. Sigh, I really wanted to give the editor the benefit of the doubt. I had this nagging feeling that I shouldn't userfy, and I should have listened. Ikip ( talk) 10:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Thankyou for letting me know.-- Thisisthebestusernameever! ( talk) 22:04, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
I cannot imagine you giving me the unprecidented short term of ten years to apologize. I am therefore blocking the offending account and will recoinsider its unblocking sometime in 2019. So there. :) -- PMDrive1061 ( talk) 22:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't see much improvement happening anytime soon at Luis Durani. Any thoughts? Drmies ( talk) 01:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
My argument is on the talk page. Hope it make sense I really can't believe you guys/gals have a problem with me removing a *contradiction* in the text where there aren't even *citations* to back up one of the viewpoints in that paragraph. It's this kind of nonsense that drove me into retirement from this place. Cheers, Neale —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.210.149 ( talk) 18:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
This is in reference to your proposed deletion of the above page, which was begun by a user now going by the monicker of kendwallace. This user has been starting or adding to many different pages concerning planned mullti-use developments in several parts of the U.S. for the past several months now. Check his log at Special:Contributions/Kendwallace. His edits are almost always incoherent and are based, for the most part on the Web sites of the developers. If you will check the history of Centennial, California, you will see how many times I have reverted his material and how many times he or she has put it back with no explanation. I frankly do not know what to do with Mr. or Ms. kendwallace. As for Tejon Mountain Village (which is in the immediate area where I live), I am developing my own article on that subject, which I will work on in User:GeorgeLouis/Sandbox and then provide it as a substitute for Tejon Mountain Village when the new version is ready. I have a dozen articles from the Bakersfield Californian which I will use as my source, as well as any good material I can find from the Tejon Ranch site and the Web pages of the Mountain Enterprise, our local weekly newspaper. I invite you to keep an eye on this article if you are interested in following up. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis ( talk) 21:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
I am a proud jewish soldier in the IDF. Starbucks has been helping with the War on Terror. I ask you to please return my work to it's rightfully state. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
You are a good guy. Why don't I buy you a plane ticket so you can have a trip to Israel on the house?
I am staying in Michigan. I am on vaction from the Israeli Embassy. Where are you from? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanks and have a great time living in this great country. Thanks for the Fort Wayne Connect. Have a great day. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.222.82 ( talk) 02:22, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Conjure Cognac. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and " What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conjure Cognac. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 01:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there are 3 citations (22, 53, 54) about testosterone/cortisol issues on diabetes, therefore I really think it is enough. Say me if you want more citations even if there are already 3 citations. Do not do edit war please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 09:42, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
You are vandal! The article are free, you told an evident lie. they are strongly sourced! You should read a book of endocrinolgy instead of making vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 17:44, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
Your accusations have not good faith!!! Because you invent accusations and you remove citations! Before deleting scientific article increase your preparation instead than making vandalism. read books! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.194.199.13 ( talk) 03:33, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Now you know I'm not vandal and my edits were not wrong. I would suggest you to revert an edited page just when you well know the topic and just when you are sure that the edits are blatantly wrong. Best regards-- Testosterone vs diabetes ( talk) 20:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
I've removed your personal offence to me in diabetes talk because I was bored to log me, moreover very often (even from my computer) I'm log out and I even do not know why-- Testosterone vs diabetes ( talk) 17:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Just an FYI re: your submission at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. I was looking over the page, and just realized that you were the third person to report User:Testosterone vs diabetes (I was the second person ... User:Nutriveg was the first). I'm going to merge my report into Nutriveg's report ... thought I would let you know, in case you wanted to do the same. --- Barek ( talk • contribs) - 19:31, 30 October 2009 (UTC)