Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Any admin can be the one to close an AfD and make the final decision -- unless they participated in the debate. DS ( talk) 13:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
You have made your points at the AfD, lifebaka's talk page and deletion review for OMM. There is no need to continue repeating yourself or making general criticisms of Wikipedia/other editors, it just makes it more difficult to follow the central discussion which is whether the article is notable. Wikipedia is not a battleground, the purpose of its discussions is to establish consensus and that only happens when you assume good faith on the part of other editors. — Joseph Roe Tk• Cb, 10:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Making references to "pedos" is not a good idea
[1].
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
20:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --
SineBot (
talk)
22:01, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Any admin can be the one to close an AfD and make the final decision -- unless they participated in the debate. DS ( talk) 13:53, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
You have made your points at the AfD, lifebaka's talk page and deletion review for OMM. There is no need to continue repeating yourself or making general criticisms of Wikipedia/other editors, it just makes it more difficult to follow the central discussion which is whether the article is notable. Wikipedia is not a battleground, the purpose of its discussions is to establish consensus and that only happens when you assume good faith on the part of other editors. — Joseph Roe Tk• Cb, 10:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Please remember to
assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. Making references to "pedos" is not a good idea
[1].
Reaper Eternal (
talk)
20:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)