![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi Robsinden. I saw your note in your last edit summary. I just wanted to let you know that Amazon has been used as a reliable source for the DVD releases for quite some time. If you check it is currently being used for several of the titles in the list. If you feel that it shouldn't be I would suggest that you bring it up at the wikiproject for Doctor Who talk page. Of course, you can bring it up at the talk page for the article but I think you will get a wider feedback at the projects talk page. This is just a suggestion and I would say that you should proceed as you wish. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 18:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi I wrote the Meglos source on the discussion page and didn't mess with the footnotes on the article page as I don't know how to do that. So if you want to check it out and put it back if it's considered an acceptable source please do so (www.devoted.com.au). It's near the bottom in the Region 1 and 4 releases from 2011 section. If you see an update by me I'll put it there unless I learn the footnote system (although generally just try Ezy DVD, JB Hi-Fi or Devoted in Australia as that's my likely sources). -Angeloz 123.2.138.148 ( talk) 15:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Are you sure your edits are the "correct" way to do this? Would you please point me in the direction of a WP that explains this? Thank you. Geeky Randy ( talk) 19:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I've just seen your recent edits to the Music Inspired by Lord of the Rings article and your assertion that Swedish titles only capitalise proper nouns. It’s interesting that you've chosen to do this because it had also occurred to me that the capitalisation may be incorrect, so I checked with the Swedish Wikipedia. The album's corresponding Swedish-language article capitalises its title as Sagan om Ringen (see here). I was just about to change the capitalisation on the English-language Wikipedia myself when I saw that you'd already done it, although in a slightly different way (great minds think alike). Now, I'm no expert on Swedish, and I assume that you know more than I do about this kind of thing, but surely if the Swedish Wikipedia capitalises the album as Sagan om Ringen, then that is probably the correct way, wouldn't you say? -- Kohoutek1138 ( talk) 14:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
TRANSCLUDED this (and replied) at Talk:Music Inspired by Lord of the Rings (Bo Hansson album). Rob Sinden ( talk) 09:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the message and the help - appreciated. I have done an "articles for deletion" entry for Roger C. Field at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger C. Field. -Bruce Airproofing ( talk) 13:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Is Scott Brown a Republican? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.46.199 ( talk) 14:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
We have only three sourced sentences to consider, so how about a merge to Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz#Film adaptations? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Popsicle (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —
Timneu22 ·
talk
12:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Per The Avengers film project deletion discussion, an article is allowable about a planned film project as long as it had enough referenced material to justify an article and is not treated as a film article (no film infobox, film is said to be planned instead of upcoming, etc.) -5- ( talk) 18:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
WP:NFF is a guideline, but it's not a strict rule. Here's the Avengers film project deletion discussion for example. I'm going to ask that you please not revert it again. -5- ( talk) 18:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't it justify its own article? It has enough references and sourced information to become its own article. It's too large to just be a subsection of a film series article. NFF needs to be taken with a common sense approach. -5- ( talk) 18:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rob, thanks for your comments. I wanted to be sure you received my message back, so it's on my talk page. Basically though, I'd appreciate your advice given this is my first Wikipedia article. Thank you! PistachioGelato ( talk) 14:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, now that Thorne is a disambiguation page, could you help re-direct links to an article per WP:FIXDABLINKS? Thanks, -- JaGa talk 23:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hi Robsinden. I saw your note in your last edit summary. I just wanted to let you know that Amazon has been used as a reliable source for the DVD releases for quite some time. If you check it is currently being used for several of the titles in the list. If you feel that it shouldn't be I would suggest that you bring it up at the wikiproject for Doctor Who talk page. Of course, you can bring it up at the talk page for the article but I think you will get a wider feedback at the projects talk page. This is just a suggestion and I would say that you should proceed as you wish. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 18:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi I wrote the Meglos source on the discussion page and didn't mess with the footnotes on the article page as I don't know how to do that. So if you want to check it out and put it back if it's considered an acceptable source please do so (www.devoted.com.au). It's near the bottom in the Region 1 and 4 releases from 2011 section. If you see an update by me I'll put it there unless I learn the footnote system (although generally just try Ezy DVD, JB Hi-Fi or Devoted in Australia as that's my likely sources). -Angeloz 123.2.138.148 ( talk) 15:41, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Are you sure your edits are the "correct" way to do this? Would you please point me in the direction of a WP that explains this? Thank you. Geeky Randy ( talk) 19:18, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi! I've just seen your recent edits to the Music Inspired by Lord of the Rings article and your assertion that Swedish titles only capitalise proper nouns. It’s interesting that you've chosen to do this because it had also occurred to me that the capitalisation may be incorrect, so I checked with the Swedish Wikipedia. The album's corresponding Swedish-language article capitalises its title as Sagan om Ringen (see here). I was just about to change the capitalisation on the English-language Wikipedia myself when I saw that you'd already done it, although in a slightly different way (great minds think alike). Now, I'm no expert on Swedish, and I assume that you know more than I do about this kind of thing, but surely if the Swedish Wikipedia capitalises the album as Sagan om Ringen, then that is probably the correct way, wouldn't you say? -- Kohoutek1138 ( talk) 14:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
TRANSCLUDED this (and replied) at Talk:Music Inspired by Lord of the Rings (Bo Hansson album). Rob Sinden ( talk) 09:14, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 18:45, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the message and the help - appreciated. I have done an "articles for deletion" entry for Roger C. Field at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger C. Field. -Bruce Airproofing ( talk) 13:35, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Is Scott Brown a Republican? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.46.199 ( talk) 14:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
We have only three sourced sentences to consider, so how about a merge to Adaptations of The Wizard of Oz#Film adaptations? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 01:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Popsicle (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —
Timneu22 ·
talk
12:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Per The Avengers film project deletion discussion, an article is allowable about a planned film project as long as it had enough referenced material to justify an article and is not treated as a film article (no film infobox, film is said to be planned instead of upcoming, etc.) -5- ( talk) 18:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
WP:NFF is a guideline, but it's not a strict rule. Here's the Avengers film project deletion discussion for example. I'm going to ask that you please not revert it again. -5- ( talk) 18:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Why doesn't it justify its own article? It has enough references and sourced information to become its own article. It's too large to just be a subsection of a film series article. NFF needs to be taken with a common sense approach. -5- ( talk) 18:36, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rob, thanks for your comments. I wanted to be sure you received my message back, so it's on my talk page. Basically though, I'd appreciate your advice given this is my first Wikipedia article. Thank you! PistachioGelato ( talk) 14:23, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi, now that Thorne is a disambiguation page, could you help re-direct links to an article per WP:FIXDABLINKS? Thanks, -- JaGa talk 23:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |